zevthepaparazzo 2,138 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 (edited) Whilst reading @Edu's thread about the The Fame Monster era being short, I stumbled across many people saying that the album should've been longer. Which raises the question: If you were Interscope records, would you release a full length album in 2009/2010? with a tracklist something among the lines of: 01. Bad Romance 02. Alejandro 03. Freakshow 04. Monster 05. Out of Control 06. Text U Pictures 07. Reloaded 08. No Way 09. Speechless 10. Dance In The Dark 11. Shut Up 12. Telephone 13. Animal 14. So Happy I Could Die 15. Teeth Or would you not do that? You can edit the tracklist and single releases and stuff, be the beautiful little managers you are! Give reasons. DISCUSS. Edited February 11 by zevthepaparazzo Anything goes! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladle Ghoulash 44,134 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 (edited) According to the Grammy Recording Academy, it IS a full length album That being said, I hate to say, sister, with that tracklist? She can keep it. Edited February 11 by Ladle Ghoulash We have forgotten our public MANNERS 2 1 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexcal24 54 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 I feel like the album is as cohesive as it should be and really selling that Monster metaphor Gaga was so obsessed about back then. Also, she was already on top of the world with The Fame as it was, another album would have hurt her. No, The Fame Monster as it is was a perfect follow up. I wouldn't add anything. 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dynamite 65,745 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 (edited) I think it was the perfect length All those mismatching songs randomly shoved in, no thank yew! Edited February 11 by dynamite Like a poem said by a neydy in red Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DESTROY UR DISEASE 17,774 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Honestly yes and no Yes because of all the unreleased songs that deserved to be released No because I think it's already perfect the way that it is, also releasing another full length project just a year after The Fame? Maybe this thing worked for Rihanna, but I don't think it also would for Gaga Spoiler also respectfuly but Freakshow sounds more like The Fame track than The Fame Monster I can smell your sickness I can... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gagzus 20,063 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Honestly add Reloaded after Telephone and No Way after Teeth and tada! 10 track LP. But because of Gaga and us, it’s classified as an LP anyway by music critics and even the GRAMMYs. Funny that by today’s standards it’s LONGER than most albums, like BTW if it were released today would be 3x longer than the average album because of all the 4-5 minute songs 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugar Baby 997 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Girl all those songs added to TFM just made it sound like a filler album lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nATAH 55,002 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 3 or 4 extra tracks at most mother, what must i do? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.