Morphine Prince 109,709 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 President Donald Trump said Wednesday that “anything less” than US control of Greenland is “unacceptable,” arguing the United States needs the territory for national security purposes, which could in turn strengthen NATO. “NATO becomes far more formidable and effective with Greenland in the hands of the UNITED STATES,” Trump wrote in an early morning Truth Social post. “Anything less than that is unacceptable.” The president’s latest comments come as Vice President JD Vance is set to host a meeting Wednesday morning at the White House with the Danish foreign minister and his Greenlandic counterpart alongside Secretary of State Marco Rubio. In the social media post, Trump reiterated his assertion that acquiring Greenland, which is a self-governing territory of Denmark, is essential for US national security. He added that it is “vital for the Golden Dome that we are building,” in reference to the missile defense systemthe Pentagon is developing. He also argued that NATO leaders should be pushing for the United States to have Greenland. “NATO should be leading the way for us to get it. IF WE DON’T, RUSSIA OR CHINA WILL, AND THAT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN! Militarily, without the vast power of the United States, much of which I built during my first term, and am now bringing to a new and even higher level, NATO would not be an effective force or deterrent - Not even close! They know that, and so do I,” Trump wrote in the post. Source: https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/14/politics/greenland-trump-nato-denmark 1 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Debithius 6,056 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 (edited) Greenland is already under NATO protection and America has a ****ing base there. Stop lying through your ****ing asshole you crying ****ing orange. Leave Greenland alone you sad piece of ****. We all know Trump wants Greenland because of the minerals. **** off. Edited January 14 by Debithius 13 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Borisapillar 10,129 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 well get over it you fat ugly rapist f*ck 2 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilia Malinin 2,954 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 “NATO should be leading the way for us to get it. IF WE DON’T, RUSSIA OR CHINA WILL, AND THAT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!" brother no one is trying to take greenland but your orange ass oh my god everyone keeps saying "oh, he's back, he's back!" but the truth is i never left! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gagzus 23,416 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Every day we’re moving closer and closer to another world war 1 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 172,972 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 34 minutes ago, Debithius said: Greenland is already under NATO protection and America has a ****ing base there. Stop lying through your ****ing asshole you crying ****ing orange. Leave Greenland alone you sad piece of ****. We all know Trump wants Greenland because of the minerals. **** off. Yeah I'm like we already have a military presence in Greenland, in fact our arctic defense relies heavily on it, so this is super dumb But we all know it isn't logic that's driving him to be this stupid or even the resources. It's ego. He wants another Louisiana Purchase sized conquest for his legacy. Thankfully our military leaders are still straight up refusing to entertain this idiocy. Whimsical bitch 4 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 172,972 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 11 minutes ago, gagzus said: Every day we’re moving closer and closer to another world war We won't cause a world war tbh. The only kind of war Trump can start rn is a civil war. Whimsical bitch 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Mayhem 3,448 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 He believes NATO doesn't have the authority to tell him what to do and they don't have the gull to attack the US. However, they've been very clear they will defend Greenland if it comes to that. US is becoming Russia 2.0... He really is rushing to make the Monroe Doctrine a reality... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gagzus 23,416 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 54 minutes ago, PartySick said: We won't cause a world war tbh. The only kind of war Trump can start rn is a civil war. Trying to take over countries he has no business being in isn’t gonna start a civil war lmao that would imply only within the US would a war start, especially if the rest of NATO pop off when he inevitably invades Greenland. He’s literally attempting to take over a country that’s owned by another European country. And Europe already thinks he’s dumb as a rock already. I mean the US hasn’t won a war since the independence war solo so are we surprised 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 172,972 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 7 minutes ago, gagzus said: Trying to take over countries he has no business being in isn’t gonna start a civil war lmao that would imply only within the US would a war start, especially if the rest of NATO pop off when he inevitably invades Greenland. He’s literally attempting to take over a country that’s owned by another European country. And Europe already thinks he’s dumb as a rock already. I mean the US hasn’t won a war since the independence war solo so are we surprised Nah. Europe would cut all economic and diplomatic ties which would handicap us greatly but I seriously doubt they'd actively fight 'cause they would see the internal conflict ignited by such a dumb move. We aren't capable of capturing and occupying Greenland, local resistance alone would be enough to drive us out within a few months to a few years. But back here, the military would fracture as Trump sends illegal orders and leadership refuses and/or resigns, civil unrest would heighten even more than it already has, Trump would be trying to federalize states' nation guards, governors would be resisting that, the actual military would be sent in to deal with dissonants, likely having clashes with the nation guards under governors' leadership, ICE and local police would clash, it would be a total dissolution of order in the US likely leading to fragmentation and potentially the end of the union as it is. Invading Greenland would weaken NATO but it'd destroy the US and Europe wouldn't have to fire a single shot tbh. I agree with all the people that say there just simply won't be another world war. Just overinflated super powers like the US that try to exert dominance and overstretch themselves to the point of collapse. Whimsical bitch 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 52,895 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 40 minutes ago, PartySick said: Nah. Europe would cut all economic and diplomatic ties which would handicap us greatly but I seriously doubt they'd actively fight 'cause they would see the internal conflict ignited by such a dumb move. We aren't capable of capturing and occupying Greenland, local resistance alone would be enough to drive us out within a few months to a few years. But back here, the military would fracture as Trump sends illegal orders and leadership refuses and/or resigns, civil unrest would heighten even more than it already has, Trump would be trying to federalize states' nation guards, governors would be resisting that, the actual military would be sent in to deal with dissonants, likely having clashes with the nation guards under governors' leadership, ICE and local police would clash, it would be a total dissolution of order in the US likely leading to fragmentation and potentially the end of the union as it is. Invading Greenland would weaken NATO but it'd destroy the US and Europe wouldn't have to fire a single shot tbh. I agree with all the people that say there just simply won't be another world war. Just overinflated super powers like the US that try to exert dominance and overstretch themselves to the point of collapse. There is another weapon other Countries can use thats often ignored. Treasuries. If cordinated to be dumped in sequence one after another it could trigger a serious US financial crisis, and if im not mistaken Northern Europe especially Norway is a significant holder 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FATCAT 60,896 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 2 hours ago, gagzus said: Every day we’re moving closer and closer to another world war We’re already in one This kitten over here (meow) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo 8,595 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 He's an embarrassment, being an American is so exhausting. Don't visit my profile Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 172,972 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 2 hours ago, Economy said: There is another weapon other Countries can use thats often ignored. Treasuries. If cordinated to be dumped in sequence one after another it could trigger a serious US financial crisis, and if im not mistaken Northern Europe especially Norway is a significant holder All the planes, tanks, subs, and nukes mean nothing 'cause Europe really could cuck us immediately should they do desire I mean, it would destabilize the entire global economy but the US would be hit first and hardest. Whimsical bitch Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 52,895 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 (edited) 21 minutes ago, PartySick said: All the planes, tanks, subs, and nukes mean nothing 'cause Europe really could cuck us immediately should they do desire I mean, it would destabilize the entire global economy but the US would be hit first and hardest. Oh yeah, Dumping US Treasuries + hard sanctions is the non nuclear "nuclear" option The US would in fact be crippled, but then so would everyone else immediately after... No one ever wins in wars, but the obvious is not understood by some pea brains out there so Edited January 14 by Economy 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.