Defmix100 6,504 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Just saw them mentioned again and remembered how they felt about Aura, do you think they still feel the same? "She (Gaga) came into Zedd's studio, her producer, while he was working on our track", says I-zen. "It was one of its first demos she immediately fell in love with. Zedd called us saying "There's a problem. Lady Gaga wants your song." We had some serious deliberation, we see ourselves as a band with a high artistic integrity and we avoid commercialization and doing cheap things such as Britney or Gaga. But suddenly there's a concrete offer on the table and saying "No" is a mistake, because it's a guaranteed lifelong pension. Each time the song is being played or sold, we get some pretty nice royalties. So we decided to give her the melody, as long as we are signed under our private names. We felt embarrassment for our fans. But she refused, she wanted "Infected Mushroom" to be credited. So, we decided to go for it thinking it won't make the cut or she'll eventually change her mind. But she didn't. Do you like the result? No. I think it's an artistic compromise. The song is too cheesy and commercialized. The way her vocals are over the melody is bad. But, what do I know about pop hits? we are honored that someone off Gaga's league found potential in our track and loved it. 2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUTELLA 13,899 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Defmix100 said: The way her vocals are over the melody is bad. Spilled 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFrenchGuy 1,259 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago (edited) That's so disrespectful... So they willingly sold out to get a nice cheque then they come and trash her? F*ck them and their "artistic integrity" Edited 5 hours ago by TheFrenchGuy 10 8 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimotheeChalamet 6,183 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 3 minutes ago, TheFrenchGuy said: That's so disrespectful... So they willingly sold out to get a nice cheque then they come and trash her? F*ck them Yep 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladle Ghoulash 29,935 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Ngl the melody on Aura slaps, so “what would we know” is about right lol We have forgotten our public MANNERS 3 1 1 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Borisapillar 9,621 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago irrelevant outside of that song 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hadrian 891 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Who would want to work with someone who says **** like this about their collaborations? you didn't come with a crucifix / you're an altar and i'm a mess / an impostor to your living flesh 3 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadyEnigma 1,314 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Aura one of her best songs they just don’t get it I fear HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA A-A-A-A-A-A OH AURAAAAA iconic Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guillaume Hamon 6,645 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago I mean you either brag about your artistic integrity and refuse to work with big popstars or you just take the cheque. Taking the cheque and call it an "artistic compromise" when it's only a financial one is peak hypocrisy. 8 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
palma 8,596 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 42 minutes ago, Defmix100 said: We had some serious deliberation, we see ourselves as a band with a high artistic integrity and we avoid commercialization and doing cheap things such as Britney or Gaga. So we decided to give her the melody, as long as we are signed under our private names. We felt embarrassment for our fans. But she refused, she wanted "Infected Mushroom" to be credited. So, we decided to go for it thinking it won't make the cut or she'll eventually change her mind. But she didn't. Do you like the result? No. I think it's an artistic compromise. The song is too cheesy and commercialized. This reads like a bunch of hipster haters thinking they are too cOoL for Gaga when she made bank for any DJ in the industry by reviving Dance music I couldn't care less about what they think tbh Is there some reason my LG7 isn't here? Has she died or something? 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladle Ghoulash 29,935 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 31 minutes ago, Guillaume Hamon said: I mean you either brag about your artistic integrity and refuse to work with big popstars or you just take the cheque. Taking the cheque and call it an "artistic compromise" when it's only a financial one is peak hypocrisy. Can’t have your cake and eat it too on that one, or as the Bulgarians say, “You can’t have a d*ck in the ass and a soul in Heaven.” Edited 3 hours ago by Ladle Ghoulash We have forgotten our public MANNERS 4 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFrenchGuy 1,259 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Ladle Ghoulash said: Can’t have your cake and eat it too on that one, or as the Bulgarians say, “You can’t have a **** in the ass and a soul in Heaven.” well apparently I made my choice 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanadelduck 2,039 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago (edited) lol losers can’t have your cake and eat it too. why don’t they donate the money to young artists then? Edited 4 hours ago by Lanadelduck Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
River 119,774 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago It's like that with every act that does any genre of pop music but believing that they are not pop because they are not "commercialized" Please bitches did "this is sparta" remix to their own song Their label is Monstercat which is the most commercialized label for trance music So sploosh your juice all over me you Riverboy 3 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tylerjs 5,953 Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago The problem isn’t that he doesn’t care for what she did with the track or that he saw it as selling out. The problem is that he had no reason to say it that way. All he had to do was say that he was hesitant on the grounds of the commercialization factor, which is fair, and that he maybe would’ve gone in a different direction sonically or structurally, but instead his framing and verbiage are just so unnecessarily spiteful. 🇨🇺🇧🇸 “It’s one banana, how much could it cost? $10?” 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.