FATCAT 60,886 Posted November 25, 2025 Share Posted November 25, 2025 3 minutes ago, Lord Mayhem said: Attacking by sea instead of land would be devastating as many of the major American cities are coastal... If you mean those so call "Tsunami" weapons, that just isn't gonna happen. Most of the energy of a nuke would just turn the water to steam, and to get a traveling tsunami-like wave you'd need to displace the water not cook it. At that point, you might as well just drop the nuke, because the waves would do minimal damage. This kitten over here (meow) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 52,839 Posted November 25, 2025 Share Posted November 25, 2025 10 hours ago, Miky said: EU and NATO do nothing, great. Freaking cowards; here in central Europe, for us it is a real threat. 10 hours ago, Lord Mayhem said: Whats the point of NATO if they do nothing when an enemy CONTINUALLY keeps crossing the line...literally I mean, casually just responding to a powerful Country full of nukes and a crazy dictator is also how things can escalate quickly Id rather not have WW3, two was enough. Every reaction has to be well thought out Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
27monster27 15,847 Posted November 25, 2025 Share Posted November 25, 2025 20 minutes ago, Lord Mayhem said: Rumors say they are testing new nuclear weapons underground where there has been lots of seismic activity in and around Russia...most recently that strong earthquake that triggered a semi-dormant volcano to erupt and triggered tsunami warnings. Attacking by sea instead of land would be devastating as many of the major American cities are coastal... Interesting. So maybe Russia is. Still though, regardless of matters the winning move with nukes is not to play. Once everyone uses them in war everyone loses. he/him/his 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Debithius 6,056 Posted November 25, 2025 Share Posted November 25, 2025 12 hours ago, River said: The EU: 11 hours ago, Miky said: EU and NATO do nothing, great. Freaking cowards; here in central Europe, for us it is a real threat. Idk what you want EU to do. It is not a military alliance lol. NATO is a different story. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FfFfFfFF 58,062 Posted November 25, 2025 Author Share Posted November 25, 2025 First images Source: https://www.facebook.com/InfoUMB/posts/pfbid02Nmp4b4vtbNfKLaxFyE6tmKCxPdnCLY6zz3zcJcdW47RLC4N1vf82H7r36VY32YSTl Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dit 46,738 Posted November 26, 2025 Share Posted November 26, 2025 Russia keeps poking NATO....dumb move tbh. They are agitating Poland and Romania with these "rogue" missiles and drones and stuff. VERY bad idea. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
4th Time Around 5,059 Posted November 26, 2025 Share Posted November 26, 2025 14 hours ago, Lord Mayhem said: Stricter sanctions but in general Russia would not be able to survive if several NATO nations tried to attack since hes already exhausted his own economy trying to overtake Ukraine which Putin thought would have been easier. His only and most desperate option would be to threaten nuclear war which is strange considering Trump also said he wants to start testing nukes again...which i also dont believe is necessary. We know these weapons work lol Russia's economy is not exhausted. I have been hearing this same nonsense for years now that sanctions will ruin their economy when in reality the Russian economy has grown and become more self suficient since the war started. Here is your throat back, thanks for the loan Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.