Charlie Kirk shooting suspect in custody

[Ivy 13,800]

3 hours ago, Emvee said:

Now who the hell said he was a far leftist? Is that what you want him to be? Just because he marked a bullet with “catch fascist” doesn’t make him a leftist. It’s typical groyper troll speak. 

A lot of maga are saying it, idk how they're arriving to this conclusion because I didn't want to read all the comments

[Ladle Ghoulash 55,280]

4 hours ago, GregJA said:

So a far leftist turned in by right-wing dad. LOL

He will get the death penalty anyways, we all know how this ends.

He’s literally a groyper lol

[Ladle Ghoulash 55,280]

16 minutes ago, Ivy said:

A lot of maga are saying it, idk how they're arriving to this conclusion because I didn't want to read all the comments

What’s funny is rank and file MAGA might be saying that, but basically every MAGA politician has moved on because the available evidence suggests he’s probably a terminally online Neo Nazi lol

[faysalaaa 5,380]

2 hours ago, Delulu Rogers said:

I’m confused was he conservative or liberal? I read that he was an unregistered voter and was on antifascist websites. 
 

If he was one of their own, why did he do it? 

Its basically confirmed hes a groyper, which is a white supremacist that follows Nick Fuentes. They hate right wingers, unless you are extreme far right that believes in IQ and the white replacement theory. Both Ben Shapiro and Charlie Kirk have been heavily attacked by groypers for years, and needed security to be protected from them.

Edited September 13, 2025 by faysalaaa

[50 Ft Queenie 655]

6 hours ago, NUTELLA said:

Turned in by his own cop father.

Never trust a pig! Lmao

Seriously thank you!! Damn boot lickers omg as if I couldn't be more obsessed with you!!!.

All cats are beautiful 

[FATCAT 60,929]

3 hours ago, Economy said:

I heard about this supposed stroke. Was this confirmed or is it a rumour?

They’re never confirm it (for national security) but there’s pretty solid evidence for a TIA and video of his face drooping pretty hard on 9/11

[Defmix100 7,172]

4 hours ago, RAMROD said:

HIs grandma said nobody in  her family is liberal, all are republican. Also, he donated about $250 for Trump 2020 campaign

She also said he'd never shot a gun

[Kayioshka 3,506]

Poor Charlie Kirk, I saw that he was slowly questionning himself about his statement about the government of isreal... And ppl started to bully him in his own camp. 

I disagree with his opinions, but I think he was a misguided good person. And he was a militant, he wasn't some politician in weird affairs and political scandals...

Now there are ppl happy of his death... Rip Charlie Kirk. 🕊

Edited September 13, 2025 by Kayi

[faysalaaa 5,380]

48 minutes ago, Kayi said:

Poor Charlie Kirk, I saw that he was slowly questionning himself about his statement about the government of isreal... And ppl started to bully him in his own camp. 

I disagree with his opinions, but I think he was a misguided good person. And he was a militant, he wasn't some politician in weird affairs and political scandals...

Now there are ppl happy of his death... Rip Charlie Kirk. 🕊

He was not just a militant, he was one of the most influential people in the West, and close friends with the president of the United States. He also owns one of the biggest political organization in America that helped Trump get elected, and he makes millions out of it. He also had ambitions to become president one day.

Nobody has a problem with Kirk's opinions, we have a problem with his prescriptions about Civil Rights being taken away, including stoning Gay people to death. He literally died saying a lie that there are too many transgender gun shooters, and we should take guns away from trans people.

He is also not misguided, he clearly knows the truth about Epstein and Israel, but because he was close to Trump, he suddenly changed his opinion and said he cant talk about it anymore.

I dont believe evil people should die, and its okay to feel bad for him and say RIP, but we should not lie about who this man truly was.

Edited September 13, 2025 by faysalaaa

[Bronco 27,563]

Remember when political assassins had massive manifestos setting out why they did it. So you knew instantly if it was political or to impress Jodie Foster. 

Now we just get a bullet reading "if you're reading this ur gay" 😂

[hamartia 3,219]

Having to read the word groyper on gagadaily 

[Kayioshka 3,506]

5 hours ago, faysalaaa said:

He was not just a militant, he was one of the most influential people in the West, and close friends with the president of the United States. He also owns one of the biggest political organization in America that helped Trump get elected, and he makes millions out of it. He also had ambitions to become president one day.

Nobody has a problem with Kirk's opinions, we have a problem with his prescriptions about Civil Rights being taken away, including stoning Gay people to death. He literally died saying a lie that there are too many transgender gun shooters, and we should take guns away from trans people.

He is also not misguided, he clearly knows the truth about Epstein and Israel, but because he was close to Trump, he suddenly changed his opinion and said he cant talk about it anymore.

I dont believe evil people should die, and its okay to feel bad for him and say RIP, but we should not lie about who this man truly was.

He started to talk about Epstein's affair and it's possible ties with the mossad. And then he received threats and got bullied...

I genuinely think that he wasn't a bad person but someone very indoctrinated. I'd say that endoctrinated ppl from the left can be very violent too. That's why I'm apolitical, I don't want to "deshumanize" some ppl like extremists do sometimes. And the fact that he questionned himself on this particular subject shows that he was honest. He was not just repeating some pre-written texts in which he doesn't believe at all like politicians does... He could have changed his opinion. But it didn't happened since he's no longer there. It could have been a very influential shift.

Again, to me an evil person is someone that destroy ppl's lives by abusing them physically/mentally or k*lling them. Even if Charlie made propaganda, he didn't executed what the Republicans already planned to do. He was a tool. 

If it was Trump or JD Vance, I wouldn't feel any empathy for them.

Edited September 13, 2025 by Kayi

[faysalaaa 5,380]

39 minutes ago, Kayi said:

He started to talk about Epstein's affair and it's possible ties with the mossad. And then he received threats and got bullied...

I genuinely think that he wasn't a bad person but someone very indoctrinated. I'd say that endoctrinated ppl from the left can be very violent too. That's why I'm apolitical, I don't want to "deshumanize" some ppl like extremists do sometimes. And the fact that he questionned himself on this particular subject shows that he was honest. He was not just repeating some pre-written texts in which he doesn't believe at all like politicians does... He could have changed his opinion. But it didn't happened since he's no longer there. It could have been a very influential shift.

Again, to me an evil person is someone that destroy ppl's lives by abusing them physically/mentally or k*lling them. Even if Charlie made propaganda, he didn't executed what the Republicans already planned to do. He was a tool. 

If it was Trump or JD Vance, I wouldn't feel any empathy for them.

At a certain point, it doesnt matter weather you are indoctrinated or not, once your choices start effecting other human beings at mass. Kirk has all the privilege to choose to be a good person, and he chose not to do so. He doubled down every single time and went more extreme, and advocated for more hate and rights being taken away.

Again, I dont support any harm to be done to him, but please lets be honest about who he was.

Edited September 13, 2025 by faysalaaa

[Kayioshka 3,506]

29 minutes ago, faysalaaa said:

At a certain point, it doesnt matter weather you are indoctrinated or not, once your choices start effecting other human beings at mass. Kirk has all the privilege to choose to be a good person, and he chose not to do so. He doubled down every single time and went more extreme, and advocated for more hate and rights being taken away.

Again, I dont support any harm to be done to him, but please lets be honest about who he was.

Yeah I get what you mean and I respect your pov. But to me, manipulation doesn't put you in a binary position where you have to choose between good and evil, that's worse... It puts the person in a position where these values are reversed or negated. 

[faysalaaa 5,380]

4 minutes ago, Kayi said:

Yeah I get what you mean and I respect your pov. But to me, manipulation doesn't put you in a binary position where you have to choose between good and evil, that's worse... It puts the person in a position where these values are reversed or negated. 

I do feel bad for his followers though, and these are the people im willing to meet halfway, and give them the benefit of the doubt.

And sorry I tent to speak in a philosophical way sometimes, I meant evil in a philosophical way, and I think we all engage in "evil", even if we are not evil.