Nicki comes for SZA on Twitter

[NickiMinajStan 6,725]

2 hours ago, nATAH said:

all of this to make a homophobic tweet sound worse than marrying AND having a child with a sex offender...

Yes, u mad bestie? . I will hold celebrities accountable to whatever standard I want, I couldn't care less about how 3 Lady GaGa fans feel about SZA, or how mad or not they think I'm allowed to be . 

I can find Nicki Minaj to be a bad person, and her life decisions to be questionable, while ALSO disliking SZA's unattractive ass, for her homophobic comments, why do you think one situation excludes the other? I can multitask . And if you think this is problematic on my end, I can always say I'm changed 10 years from now, and there will always be someone out there who did something worse, so I'm good according to your logic, I don't even know why you're mad . Anyways, QUEEN OF RAP Nicki Minaj ended that hasbeen, love to see it 

[Guillaume Hamon 6,469]

2 hours ago, South Blonde said:

She did? Which track?

https://en.as.com/entertainment/nicki-minaj-responds-to-lady-gagas-haus-labs-tiktok-n/

[nATAH 48,616]

2 hours ago, OliviaRodrigoStan said:

Yes, u mad bestie? . I will hold celebrities accountable to whatever standard I want, I couldn't care less about how 3 Lady GaGa fans feel about SZA, or how mad or not they think I'm allowed to be . 

I can find Nicki Minaj to be a bad person, and her life decisions to be questionable, while ALSO disliking SZA's unattractive ass, for her homophobic comments, why do you think one situation excludes the other? I can multitask . And if you think this is problematic on my end, I can always say I'm changed 10 years from now, and there will always be someone out there who did something worse, so I'm good according to your logic, I don't even know why you're mad . Anyways, QUEEN OF RAP Nicki Minaj ended that hasbeen, love to see it 

I mean... no, i'm not mad  you just sound incredibly hypocritical and delusional

to have a problem with one thing SZA did and side with nicki and her mountain of issues just doesn't make sense

[NewYorkGirl 1,460]

You definitely have the right to feel how you feel about whatever, but don’t be upset when people are questioning your morality for playing on the side of a rapist and a child molester. 

Edited Wednesday at 06:38 PM by NewYorkGirl

[nkta 353]

Is Nicki a new Trump? 🤡 

[TheARTPOPball 432]

6 hours ago, nATAH said:

I mean... no, i'm not mad  you just sound incredibly hypocritical and delusional

to have a problem with one thing SZA did and side with nicki and her mountain of issues just doesn't make sense

I don't think they are siding with Nicki's “mountain of issues” they are simply siding with her in this one situation that is completely irrelevant to the things you are mentioning. SZA doesn’t just get a free pass just bc nicki has done more questionable things, and just bc some time has passed. She made those comments at a grown age of 21 and knew exactly what she was saying. 

Edited Thursday at 12:16 AM by TheARTPOPball

[nATAH 48,616]

8 hours ago, TheARTPOPball said:

I don't think they are siding with Nicki's “mountain of issues” they are simply siding with her in this one situation that is completely irrelevant to the things you are mentioning. SZA doesn’t just get a free pass just bc nicki has done more questionable things, and just bc some time has passed. She made those comments at a grown age of 21 and knew exactly what she was saying. 

that still doesn't make any sense, considering nicki attacked sza out of nowhere

like why is it so unforgivable that sza was homophobic 10+ years ago that it makes nicki's entire stack of problematic behaviour irrelevant?  

it's not about sza getting a free pass, it's about dragging sza for one thing and thinking nicki is in the right because of something unrelated despite nicki starting all of this

Edited Thursday at 08:45 AM by nATAH

[Bronco 10,795]

8 hours ago, TheARTPOPball said:

I don't think they are siding with Nicki's “mountain of issues” they are simply siding with her in this one situation that is completely irrelevant to the things you are mentioning. SZA doesn’t just get a free pass just bc nicki has done more questionable things, and just bc some time has passed. She made those comments at a grown age of 21 and knew exactly what she was saying. 

You can't play the card that Nicki's behaviour is irrelevant to this one sided twitter beef to defend someone calling up something SZA did that's entirely unrelated to this one sided twitter beef to justify them supporting Nicki. 

And let's also point out that anyone taking Nicki's side because of SZA's unrelated homophobia, is not only choosing to side with a p*do enabler and r*pist enabler - but is also siding with someone who's called people F*ggots and sissies in their lyrics as recently as the 2018 Queen album. 

[TheARTPOPball 432]

2 hours ago, Bronco said:

 

 

3 hours ago, nATAH said:

that still doesn't make any sense, considering nicki attacked sza out of nowhere

like why is it so unforgivable that sza was homophobic 10+ years ago that it makes nicki's entire stack of problematic behaviour irrelevant?  

it's not about sza getting a free pass, it's about dragging sza for one thing and thinking nicki is in the right because of something unrelated despite nicki starting all of this

 

2 hours ago, Bronco said:

You can't play the card that Nicki's behaviour is irrelevant to this one sided twitter beef to defend someone calling up something SZA did that's entirely unrelated to this one sided twitter beef to justify them supporting Nicki. 

And let's also point out that anyone taking Nicki's side because of SZA's unrelated homophobia, is not only choosing to side with a p*do enabler and r*pist enabler - but is also siding with someone who's called people F*ggots and sissies in their lyrics as recently as the 2018 Queen album. 

They said in their reply, which the person i originally responded to…..

19 hours ago, OliviaRodrigoStan said:

I can find Nicki Minaj to be a bad person, and her life decisions to be questionable, while ALSO disliking SZA's unattractive ass, for her homophobic comments, why do you think one situation excludes the other?

What I'm saying is the above statement is true and regardless of what either person is doing, this person has every right to dislike SZA for her homophobic comments. Who is anyone to tell them they are wrong for doing so? They condemn nicki for her actions in the same paragraph. 

[Bronco 10,795]

15 minutes ago, TheARTPOPball said:

They said in their reply, which the person i originally responded to…..

What I'm saying is the above statement is true and regardless of what either person is doing, this person has every right to dislike SZA for her homophobic comments. Who is anyone to tell them they are wrong for doing so? They condemn nicki for her actions in the same paragraph. 

Talk about selective quoting. That user literally ended their comment with 

20 hours ago, OliviaRodrigoStan said:

Anyways, QUEEN OF RAP Nicki Minaj ended that hasbeen, love to see it

That's taking sides. 

[TheARTPOPball 432]

14 minutes ago, Bronco said:

Talk about selective quoting. That user literally ended their comment with 

That's taking sides. 

Selective quoting bc yes that is the part of the paragraph in which i responded to, in my post that you replied to… 
 

We ALL know nicki is a bad person (there is no debate about that) and it still says so in their post. All I suggested, is that just bc this person is disagreeing with SZA in this particular instance doesn't immediately equate to them agreeing with everything problematic thing nicki has done, thats is simply not a fair thing to just imply. 

Edited Thursday at 11:55 AM by TheARTPOPball

[Bronco 10,795]

20 minutes ago, TheARTPOPball said:

Selective quoting bc yes that is the part of the paragraph in which i responded to, in my post that you replied to… 
 

We ALL know nicki is a bad person (there is no debate about that) and it still says so in their post. All I suggested, is that just bc this person is disagreeing with SZA in this particular instance doesn't immediately equate to them agreeing with everything problematic thing nicki has done, thats is simply not a fair thing to just imply. 

And calling Nicki the Queen of Rap and celebrating her one sided beef is supporting Nicki. You can't say you don't support Nicki's behaviour while also going "yass queen slay" at her behaviour. 

I get what you are trying to say. But you're supporting a hypocrite. 

[TheARTPOPball 432]

Just now, Bronco said:

And calling Nicki the Queen of Rap and celebrating her one sided beef is supporting Nicki. You can't say you don't support Nicki's behaviour while also going "yass queen slay" at her behaviour. 

I get what you are trying to say. But you're supporting a hypocrite. 

Im not defending any of nicki’s actions regarding her husband and brother. That’s her own bed to make. Shes sitting on a  grey line where she hasn't done anything illegal but its in an extremely morally questionable situation and refuses to speak up on it, and i feel no remorse for her on that. Nor do i really think any of this SZA mess was necessary. But i do have the tendency to mediate and de-escalate. So im just trying to give that commenter the benefit of the doubt and offer a different perspective on their statement. 

[nATAH 48,616]

1 hour ago, TheARTPOPball said:

 

 

They said in their reply, which the person i originally responded to…..

What I'm saying is the above statement is true and regardless of what either person is doing, this person has every right to dislike SZA for her homophobic comments. Who is anyone to tell them they are wrong for doing so? They condemn nicki for her actions in the same paragraph. 

I mean they have every right but it's literally the definition of hypocritical

it's the same mindset as trump supporters tbh

Edited Thursday at 01:00 PM by nATAH

[27monster27 13,001]

The way Zach Campbell has had to make a trio of nicki videos across three weeks because of her behavior 😭:

This is the third video he has had to make on her.