J.K. Rowling Vows To Use Her Own Wealth To Funds Anti Trans Organization

[Toyga 74]

How does taking rights away from trans individuals help women? It doesn't make women safer. 

Instead of assisting women, she chooses to attack trans people. 

Every hour, women are killed, raped, or fleeing abusive partners. 

Let's focus on helping them. Can't you see what the real problem is? It's men!

[ALGAYDO 31,959]

34 minutes ago, Ilia Malinin said:

none of them ever do.  i'm convinced it's because they still see us as women that need protecting.  like yeah, sure, tell that 5'8 brick sh*thouse of a man with more body hair than most cis men that he needs protecting bc he was born with a uterus.  either that or we don't exist to them, like it's impossible for trans people to go the other way.  as if elliot page doesn't exist.

That’s what I’ve been noticing these past few months. They never have anything to say about trans men… it’s literally only trans women they fixate on… they have some skeletons in their closet for sure. Like ugh, JUST LEAVE TRANS WOMEN ALONE LET THEM LIVE THEIR LIVES. I’m so sorry my country’s government think they have a say in what yall do, it’s literally dystopian. 

[psychodramajonny 1]

to think she could've been aborted but wasn't :-(

[ALGAYDO 31,959]

The way my blood pressure skyrockets every time I see her bítch áss name mentioned lol 

[Bronco 9,725]

15 minutes ago, ALGAYDO said:

That’s what I’ve been noticing these past few months. They never have anything to say about trans men… it’s literally only trans women they fixate on… they have some skeletons in their closet for sure. Like ugh, JUST LEAVE TRANS WOMEN ALONE LET THEM LIVE THEIR LIVES. I’m so sorry my country’s government think they have a say in what yall do, it’s literally dystopian. 

In the UK some high profile cases have been trans men - but only trans men who detransitioned or a conceptual trans man.

And the argument has always been "look at how they're damaging little girls". If a trans man exists and doesn't seek to detransition they ignore them though - minus some dickheads who send hate messages, but there's no political targeting by the big names. 

And I truly think its because they don't want to attack happy trans men because it would invalidate their patriarchal conservatism. They truly believe men are perfect and to be masculine is divine and grants all important power, so there's no logical way for them to attack someone for seeking to be something which is "perfect" in their ideology. 

[Jack3257 734]

There’s a difference between liking Harry Potter and the loving creator behind it.

But this is despicable.

We all know Rowling is a terrible person.  Just move on and support people who stand behind what you believe in.

If her beliefs have ruined something that once held great meaning to you, I am sorry to hear.  

[A Fried Egg 8,450]

Ms Rowling, there are better ways to spend your time and money. This obsession has to end somewhere. 

I don’t like this LGB without the T thing. 

[angelduuh 434]

This is so sad. I really love Harry Potter movies and books, they were a part of my childhood. Guess I'll just pirate their stuff. Honestly, what a bitch. She really is Dolores Umbridge in real life. 

[hELXIG 42,854]

Avada kedavra bitch. It's time to leave this world

[lastpopicon 27,136]

9 hours ago, Gabe said:

I hope HBO cancels the show, terrible. 

Th€y won't.

That's why everyone needs to make a conscious effort and not stream it, and if people have to watch it, at least pirate it.

[The Fame Monster 4,175]

It’s honestly really disappointing to see Rowling continue to misunderstand what it means to be trans. Her concerns about cis women’s rights just feel misplaced when they’re directed at trans people, especially trans women, who make up such a small and vulnerable group. Their existence doesn’t take anything away from cis women. In fact, trans women often face many of the same challenges, and sometimes even more.

If she’s truly concerned about women’s safety and rights, maybe her energy would be better spent focusing on the rise of toxic, misogynistic movements, like those driven by people such as Andrew Tate and his followers. That’s where the real threat to women (and to humanity as a whole) lies, not in the existence of trans people simply trying to live their lives in peace.

She’s officially human garbage and shouldn’t be supported in any way. Harry Potter was a gift to the world, but now she’s ruined the beautiful picture she once painted, and most of all, ruined herself and her reputation for good.

[hELXIG 42,854]

2 hours ago, lastpopicon said:

Th€y won't.

That's why everyone needs to make a conscious effort and not stream it, and if people have to watch it, at least pirate it.

100% pirate it. Cut the weed off at the roots. We all need to learn to pirate again

[Ilia Malinin 1,527]

9 hours ago, A Fried Egg said:

I don’t like this LGB without the T thing. 

there would be no lgbt without the t, either.  marsha p. johnson did not throw the first brick at stonewall for part of the community to try and turn its back on trans people.

Edited May 30 by Ilia Malinin

[Ilia Malinin 1,527]

10 hours ago, Bronco said:

they don't want to attack happy trans men because it would invalidate their patriarchal conservatism.

this is it right here.  the more men, the better in their eyes.  i'm still gay as f*ck though, you're not gonna un-homosexuality me.  the more men on this planet, the more they think they can take over.  but jokes on them, trans men know the struggles of women.  because we used to be them.  as a trans man, i stand with my sisters.  trans or otherwise.  if you identify as female, i will have your back.  i will go down with the ship to protect you.

[OMF 3,412]

20 hours ago, REALITY said:

If y'all didn't boycott Harry Potter before, you should 100% be doing so now.

Shame on HBO for betraying the LGBTQ audience by going for the HP series. Of all networks I expected more from them in particular