Roughhouse Dandy 13,603 Posted February 8, 2025 Share Posted February 8, 2025 1 hour ago, PartySick said: Gonna go kms I hate it here This is my Hannah Montana™️ lipgloss. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
infinitesadness 38 Posted February 8, 2025 Share Posted February 8, 2025 a lot of stuff companies have been doing as of late has been for PR points/virtue signaling, but seeing as the trump campaign highjacked USA tiktok and put that message saying that they thank trump; its becoming more evident than ever that big tech is slowly being bought out and muzzled by the republican party. i live in Canada and my feeds would be saturated regularly with right-wing outlets that I have not once shown interest in or interacted with. its very orwellian. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANVEEROY 65,226 Posted February 8, 2025 Share Posted February 8, 2025 Pink Capitalism 101 READ MY...BODY LANGUAGE! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,653 Posted February 8, 2025 Share Posted February 8, 2025 The pendulum always swings back. I'm personally boycotting any company that is bending the knee to Trump as much as I can.Some things are difficult to boycott but I try my best. One day, hopefully soon, when these people are no longer in power we will remember what they've done. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jill 31,812 Posted February 8, 2025 Author Share Posted February 8, 2025 1 minute ago, Morphine Prince said: The pendulum always swings back. The pendulum swings back indeed. What what does that mean? That companies will some time in the future return to being performatively in favor of rights? That people won't vote for Trump in the future? Even if those things are true, the pendulum always swings back, so maybe people will vote for a second Trump in 40 years time. Can we stop the pendulum for swinging then? If yes, then that means the other side can, too. Former First Lady of the United States. Now card-carrying member of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,653 Posted February 8, 2025 Share Posted February 8, 2025 42 minutes ago, Jill said: The pendulum swings back indeed. What what does that mean? That companies will some time in the future return to being performatively in favor of rights? That people won't vote for Trump in the future? Even if those things are true, the pendulum always swings back, so maybe people will vote for a second Trump in 40 years time. Can we stop the pendulum for swinging then? If yes, then that means the other side can, too. It means they will try to win the public over with performative actions but hopefully people don’t fall for it. The pendulum can’t be stopped from swinging back unless by force. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jill 31,812 Posted February 8, 2025 Author Share Posted February 8, 2025 Just now, Morphine Prince said: It means they will try to win the public over with performative actions but hopefully people don’t fall for it. The pendulum can’t be stopped from swinging back unless by force. So either it swings back indefinitely, in which case there will be more bad times even after the good times, or it won't, in which case there's the possibility that it stops swinging now, so there won't be any good times in the future. One of the two. Former First Lady of the United States. Now card-carrying member of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 172,462 Posted February 8, 2025 Share Posted February 8, 2025 11 minutes ago, Jill said: So either it swings back indefinitely, in which case there will be more bad times even after the good times, or it won't, in which case there's the possibility that it stops swinging now, so there won't be any good times in the future. One of the two. Well, not really. Progress is undeniable. The hypothetical pendulum swings in the proper direction then we backslide a bit but then we recover and go farther than we did before. It's two steps forward, one step back. We're currently taking a step back. Whimsical bitch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jill 31,812 Posted February 8, 2025 Author Share Posted February 8, 2025 Just now, PartySick said: Well, not really. Progress is undeniable. The hypothetical pendulum swings in the proper direction then we backslide a bit but then we recover and go farther than we did before. It's two steps forward, one step back. We're currently taking a step back. I don't think progress is undeniable. One has to make it so. It could be in the long run, yes, but how much time do we have before the planet bursts into flames, or the people are just too poor to survive? Former First Lady of the United States. Now card-carrying member of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 172,462 Posted February 8, 2025 Share Posted February 8, 2025 1 minute ago, Jill said: I don't think progress is undeniable. One has to make it so. It could be in the long run, yes, but how much time do we have before the planet bursts into flames, or the people are just too poor to survive? Well, ok, social progress is undeniable. Capitalism is too powerful for us to stop 'cause we won't organize against it despite it choking the life out of us and our planet. But racial equity and queer rights can't be stopped, they can only hit fat, orange speed bumps. That's what I meant. Whimsical bitch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jill 31,812 Posted February 8, 2025 Author Share Posted February 8, 2025 Just now, PartySick said: Well, ok, social progress is undeniable. Capitalism is too powerful for us to stop 'cause we won't organize against it despite it choking the life out of us and our planet. But racial equity and queer rights can't be stopped, they can only hit fat, orange speed bumps. That's what I meant. On the contrary, I think social progress is only possible with economic progress and material abundance for everybody. It isn't possible by itself. Now the question for me is, can capitalism provide us with that material incentive? I don't think so. Former First Lady of the United States. Now card-carrying member of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.