Starmie25 17,791 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 (edited) side note: extra bawp here Edited January 27 by Starmie25 3 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
llemesm 1,482 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 the bop who was not Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir 1,544 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 Little managers after finding out it was not a real Gaga song 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
santxz 18 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 i mean, this is clearly AI too, even the album cover 1 1 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starmie25 17,791 Posted January 27 Author Share Posted January 27 It's part of his new album, but if you check the release date it says it came out few days ago hmmmmm...... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVeryGagaHolyDick 24,588 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 Nothing will ever beat the original version we got, with just the chorus Those verses are… something 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starmie25 17,791 Posted January 27 Author Share Posted January 27 15 minutes ago, A Very Gaga Holida said: Nothing will ever beat the original version we got, with just the chorus Those verses are… something You mean the crunchy one that sounds like it was transported from a 2007 ipod 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVeryGagaHolyDick 24,588 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 Just now, Starmie25 said: You mean the crunchy one that sounds like it was transported from a 2007 ipod Yesssss, not the quality of the sound though Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GagaGame 3,572 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 1 minute ago, Starmie25 said: You mean the crunchy one that sounds like it was transported from a 2007 ipod Yeah 𝚎𝚢𝚎𝚜 𝚛𝚘𝚕𝚕 𝚋𝚊𝚌𝚔 𝚒𝚗 𝚎𝚌𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜𝚢 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starmie25 17,791 Posted January 27 Author Share Posted January 27 20 minutes ago, A Very Gaga Holida said: Yesssss, not the quality of the sound though Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killa 17,306 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 And i oop- Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HotLikeMexico 5,109 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 It’s so catchy but Jesus these lyrics are atrocious. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkgaga 4,676 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 I think it was already confirmed he made the song after the “leak”. Would be funny if it turns out it actually is a Gaga song, and he just assumed it was AI 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChromaticaBoy 941 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 (edited) 44 minutes ago, darkgaga said: I think it was already confirmed he made the song after the “leak”. Would be funny if it turns out it actually is a Gaga song, and he just assumed it was AI I was curious to know if things like this happen and what happens in that case so I asked ChatGPT (see below). So basically the fact that there’s a studio version out (still heavily relying on ai) means nothing. The question is still on the original snippet, if it could be real or not. Spoiler In such a situation, several legal issues related to copyright and intellectual property may arise. Let's analyze the main legal scenarios: 1. **Copyright of the original artist:** - Even if the snippet was published unofficially, copyright protection is automatically granted as soon as the work is created in a tangible form (e.g., recorded or written). - Therefore, if the original artist can prove they are the author of the snippet and the subsequently released full version, they may have the right to claim authorship and take action against the other artist for copyright infringement. 2. **Copyright infringement by the other artist:** - If the second artist uses the snippet without authorization and creates their own version, they could be infringing copyright, especially if the snippet contains protected elements (such as melody, lyrics, or distinctive arrangements). - The original artist could take legal action to have the unauthorized version removed, seek compensation for damages, or even claim the rights to the derivative version. 3. **Proof of ownership and timelines:** - If the original artist has evidence (such as recordings, emails, or timestamps) proving that the snippet was created before the other artist's release, they will have a stronger position in a legal dispute. - Otherwise, if they cannot prove an earlier creation date, the other artist may have grounds to claim rights. In conclusion, if the original artist can provide evidence of authorship of the snippet, they have a strong chance of asserting their rights and taking legal action against the other artist for copyright infringement. Edited January 27 by ChromaticaBoy 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HermesG 1,553 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 (edited) meanwhile, even his cover is ai / heavily photoshoped. he made n album n didnt promote it at all. last post 2022? c'mon something is totally off.. he is here for sure. plus, everything came after the leaks. i thing i saw the profile with the person that first time post the youtube link on a group. it was a latino guy. therefore the options, 1.he made the ai leak with gagas voice and.. bingo he was lucky to be very good n liked enough n then make it again with his (is his or ai again?) voice.. or.. 2. took the leaked snippet and build on it an ai extention. in this senario, if there is a real (part of the) song it will be a problem n we ll learn it today later. Edited January 27 by HermesGr Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.