Blake Lively sues Justin Baldoni for harassment and reputation destruction

[stvn 591]

3 hours ago, salty like sodium said:

lol. all the assumptions in this message are so hilarious i'm not going to even bother answering. like you said, two things can be true at once, but it seems in your case the only thing that can be true is whatever blake lively is saying. and then you have the gall to call me simple minded when you don't even know me lmao. ok jan. 

Do you think there is a chance her allegations are true? The evidence is pretty compelling. 

Again, I'll ask you to read the lawsuit, or at least a good summary of it. You clearly haven't. 

I do think Blake has pretty cringe moments but you seem to only want to focus on that, and her cringe moments are NOT an excuse for his potential behavior. 

Your coments are not going to age well. Period. 

What assumptions am I making? Please enlighten me. 

[salty like sodium 1,060]

5 hours ago, stvn said:

Do you think there is a chance her allegations are true? The evidence is pretty compelling. 

Again, I'll ask you to read the lawsuit, or at least a good summary of it. You clearly haven't. 

I do think Blake has pretty cringe moments but you seem to only want to focus on that, and her cringe moments are NOT an excuse for his potential behavior. 

Your coments are not going to age well. Period. 

What assumptions am I making? Please enlighten me. 

your first mistake was assuming I hadn't read the lawsuit. and that's all I need to know to know that this conversation is a waste of my time – since I actually have read the lawsuit. Also, it's comments with two "m"s. 

[stvn 591]

2 hours ago, salty like sodium said:

your first mistake was assuming I hadn't read the lawsuit. and that's all I need to know to know that this conversation is a waste of my time – since I actually have read the lawsuit. Also, it's comments with two "m"s. 

Lol I know how to spell comments, I was typing quickly. But bringing that up is not relevant and has nothing to do with this. That's why I know you have no actual argument. 

So since you've read it, what did you think? Do you think it's credible? Just curious. 

[salty like sodium 1,060]

3 hours ago, stvn said:

Lol I know how to spell comments, I was typing quickly. But bringing that up is not relevant and has nothing to do with this. That's why I know you have no actual argument. 

So since you've read it, what did you think? Do you think it's credible? Just curious. 

I'm confused, are you actually interested and "curious" in my thoughts or should I not waste my time since you also affirm that I have "no actual arguments" (without even bothering to wonder or even ask whether I do?)

I did read the suit, I have many thoughts but ultimately I'm fairly confident you're too biased for any rational discussion so I'm going to save us both time and stop engaging. Peace! 

[stvn 591]

52 minutes ago, salty like sodium said:

I'm confused, are you actually interested and "curious" in my thoughts or should I not waste my time since you also affirm that I have "no actual arguments" (without even bothering to wonder or even ask whether I do?)

I did read the suit, I have many thoughts but ultimately I'm fairly confident you're too biased for any rational discussion so I'm going to save us both time and stop engaging. Peace! 

Yes I am curious. You keep saying a lot without making literally any points and I am hoping that you will because I want to know what you thought of the lawsuit. 

How am I biased for saying the allegations are serious and should at least be allowed to be heard? Do you disagree with that or something? I really have no clue where you stand because you are saying a whole lot of nothing, insulting my grammar, and doing everything except making and statements on your beliefs. 

[salty like sodium 1,060]

1 hour ago, stvn said:

Yes I am curious. You keep saying a lot without making literally any points and I am hoping that you will because I want to know what you thought of the lawsuit. 

How am I biased for saying the allegations are serious and should at least be allowed to be heard? Do you disagree with that or something? I really have no clue where you stand because you are saying a whole lot of nothing, insulting my grammar, and doing everything except making and statements on your beliefs. 

Girl please. Since in your very first interaction with me you:

1. Implied I was "insane"

2. Called me "people like you" (whatever the eff that means )

3. accused me of not reading the lawsuit

4. accused me of "falling for the PR campaign against Blake" which was basically just her promoting her own businesses during a press tour for a film about DV. (Yes, Justin probably is responsible for her wanting to sell hair care and booze to DV victims right?) 

5. called me "simple minded" and affirmed I could be "easily swayed"

6. Accused me of not supporting Amber

And that was just in your first reply to one of my comments.  I don't owe you anything, and I also didn't insult your grammar: you insulted yourself with your own spelling (which is different from grammar) and are accusing me of insulting you for correcting it...  I don't need to make statements on my beliefs to know you are just here looking for a fight, and I'm not playing sis. Have a blessed day. 

[stvn 591]

39 minutes ago, salty like sodium said:

Girl please. Since in your very first interaction with me you:

1. Implied I was "insane"

2. Called me "people like you" (whatever the eff that means )

3. accused me of not reading the lawsuit

4. accused me of "falling for the PR campaign against Blake" which was basically just her promoting her own businesses during a press tour for a film about DV. (Yes, Justin probably is responsible for her wanting to sell hair care and booze to DV victims right?) 

5. called me "simple minded" and affirmed I could be "easily swayed"

6. Accused me of not supporting Amber

And that was just in your first reply to one of my comments.  I don't owe you anything, and I also didn't insult your grammar: you insulted yourself with your own spelling (which is different from grammar) and are accusing me of insulting you for correcting it...  I don't need to make statements on my beliefs to know you are just here looking for a fight, and I'm not playing sis. Have a blessed day. 

Keep spinning

[salty like sodium 1,060]

1 minute ago, stvn said:

Keep spinning

reread your own posts lmao

[Shyane 1,608]

Back to the topic, I just watched this and got to understand the situations better now. Wow, his PR team is good...

 

[Fusel 1,093]

On 12/23/2024 at 1:56 PM, salty like sodium said:

your first mistake was assuming I hadn't read the lawsuit. and that's all I need to know to know that this conversation is a waste of my time – since I actually have read the lawsuit. Also, it's comments with two "m"s. 

*I mistakenly quoted, mods please delete*

Edited 18 hours ago by Fusel

[Future Lovers 6,530]

On 12/21/2024 at 9:21 AM, weed said:

I would like to see who the cast and crew overall get behind.

They already did. They’ve been behind Blake this whole time and have distanced themselves from him. 

[Future Lovers 6,530]

On 12/21/2024 at 3:47 PM, salty like sodium said:

the idea that a not so well known actor like Baldoni would even attempt to "sexually harass" an extremely famous woman married to an extremely famous man who also happens to be best friends with the most famous person on the planet during his directorial debut in group environments is actually hilarious. 

You can’t be serious. You think that a woman can’t be harassed simply because the person doing it isn’t as powerful as she is? This happens all the time. 

[Future Lovers 6,530]

Lot of really disgusting people on this site. A woman comes forward with allegations of sexual harassment and your first response is “I don’t like her” and it gets dozens of upvotes. No different than MAGAts. No different at all. 

It’s always believe women and support women until it’s a woman you don’t like. 

Edited 14 hours ago by Future Lovers

[stvn 591]

7 minutes ago, Future Lovers said:

Lot of really disgusting people on this site. A woman comes forward with allegations of sexual harassment and your first response is “I don’t like her” and it gets dozens of upvotes. No different than MAGAts. No different at all. 

It’s always believe women and support women until it’s a woman you don’t like. 

Thank you. I feel like I'm living in the twilight zone. 

[salty like sodium 1,060]

1 hour ago, Future Lovers said:

You can’t be serious. You think that a woman can’t be harassed simply because the person doing it isn’t as powerful as she is? This happens all the time. 

way to extrapolate and twist words. you do you i guess