Jump to content
celeb

NBC News reports that Jay-Z has been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl with Diddy


Teletubby
 Share

Featured Posts

PartySick
2 hours ago, JohnnyVersace said:

Accusing Beyonce of knowing about this without any evidence is gross tbh. You don't know every single thing your partner does, or every action they make at a party or event when you're not present. Men infamously have affairs, cheat, hang out at strip clubs, hire escorts, etc.

To automatically implicate her as if she's helped conceal this is.....weird. She already released an album about their dirty laundry, I highly doubt she's actively been hiding some deeper sinister secret.

 

These "parties" also happen a lot. Everybody attends them, even Gaga has attended Hollywood get togethers that serve to normalize crowds of celebrities gathering.

For all we know, assuming this allegation is true, Bey tagged along to the normal parties and knew nothing about the ones where bad sh*t went down.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Chromatography
21 hours ago, BUtterfield 8 said:

Beyoncé start getting your divorce papers ready for your attorney!

I would be shocked if she didn’t know any of the diddy antics/any antics involving jay z.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

StarstruckIllusion
17 hours ago, AMRer said:

No words, this is f*cking sick...

Others I guess are now glad this happened to Beyoncé to make her fall, but I would leave aside the stan wars aside till we know what really happened. That being said, if Jay Z did it and Bey knew, all the power of law falls over them

 

17 hours ago, RudraCNG said:

Omg, people wishing  for more victims just to erase the career of some artist they don't like. Truly disgusting. Just think before typing ffs.

There is nothing to wish for, nor more victims that are needed.

Clearly so many moguls have already committed crimes they are hiding.

I only wish for more these lawsuits and accusations to come out bc clearly they are paying for them to be silenced.

The stars aligning against Taylor is a frivolous point and yall know that, but go off ig - let’s see if Jay get convicted.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

StarstruckIllusion
6 hours ago, AMRer said:

Completely agree. And I would go further... Most of those people are praying for Beyoncé to be involved so her career gets finished for a f*cking stan war. Human trash at its peak. As that user who publicly desired Taylor got involved in something like this simply because they are tired of her (that comment is still there btw, so I guess moderators agree with its message)

Don’t fume and put words in my or the moderator’s mouth. I said hope it comes out, not hope she did. 

She’s already done weird **** publicly but lemme not derail the thread any further 

Link to post
Share on other sites

PartySick
6 hours ago, AMRer said:

(that comment is still there btw, so I guess moderators agree with its message)

Just because a post is left visible doesn't mean we endorse the post.

Can you imagine if every post on this site had to be agreeable to us personally?

Idek what @StarstruckIllusion even meant by that comment. I give them more credit than to think they're hoping Taylor Swift assaulted somebody, that would just be stupid and they're definitely smarter than that :rip: 

  • Thanks 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

PartySick
10 minutes ago, StarstruckIllusion said:

She’s already done weird **** publicly but lemme not derail the thread any further 

Has she? Aside from the private jet thing (which most people don't care about anyway) I assumed her record was basically spotless. 

But yeah, conversations for another thread :bear: 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

StarstruckIllusion
12 minutes ago, PartySick said:

Just because a post is left visible doesn't mean we endorse the post.

Can you imagine if every post on this site had to be agreeable to us personally?

Idek what @StarstruckIllusion even meant by that comment. I give them more credit than to think they're hoping Taylor Swift assaulted somebody, that would just be stupid and they're definitely smarter than that :rip: 

Thank you. No, I won’t want or wish for more victims in the world than there needs to be.

10 minutes ago, PartySick said:

Has she? Aside from the private jet thing (which most people don't care about anyway) I assumed her record was basically spotless. 

But yeah, conversations for another thread :bear: 

Spoiler

She’s dated multiple men who were minors and she was a young adult at the time, just as Jay Z did. Overall, Taylor’s a force for good and things are not on P Diddy, R Kelly or allegedly Jay Z’s level, but it always seems to start with small weird things like that. Her new protégé Gracie is weird too…

There are bigger fish to fry. I am not liking what I’m hearing about Kimye. Justice always take her time and we need to watch how this Jay Z disaster goes.

Let’s just hope this all isn’t true but if I’m being realistic… yeah Jay aint innocent. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

AMRer
On 12/10/2024 at 2:46 AM, PartySick said:

Just because a post is left visible doesn't mean we endorse the post.

Can you imagine if every post on this site had to be agreeable to us personally?

Idek what @StarstruckIllusion even meant by that comment. I give them more credit than to think they're hoping Taylor Swift assaulted somebody, that would just be stupid and they're definitely smarter than that :rip: 

Well, that was quite a lame excuse because yes, there's hundreds of posts a day but that one was reported, so at least one mod agreed with it. 

And sorry but I don't know that user at all. Now I should know personally every user so I know whit was intention the post was mode. C'mon it's 100% clear the intention...

Link to post
Share on other sites

PartySick
9 minutes ago, AMRer said:

Well, that was quite a lame excuse because yes, there's hundreds of posts a day but that one was reported, so at least one mod agreed with it. 

And sorry but I don't know that user at all. Now I should know personally every user so I know whit was intention the post was mode. C'mon it's 100% clear the intention...

Sis we get a lot of reports and you don't know what action was taken 'cause we don't discuss moderation publicly :laughga: 

Idk what to tell you, we don't have to explain ourselves to you tbh. Feel free to think whatever confirms your worst opinions.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

AMRer
1 minute ago, PartySick said:

Idk what to tell you, we don't have to explain ourselves to you tbh

Well you kinda did it cause in the first reply you justified that user post, so :oops:

Anyways :vegas:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Flippy

Never mind :madge:

Edited by Flippy
No fighting
TMBT 3.22.11 // TBTWB 1.17.13 // ArtRAVE 6.3.14 // C2CT 5.28.15 // TJWT 8.13.17 // Chromatica World Tour 9.8.22
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bronco
13 hours ago, BUtterfield 8 said:

So the inconsistencies mentioned....are like not really proof of anything? 

Jay Z & Diddy pictured in different location but no evidence currently that they stayed there throughout.

Celebrity states they weren't there. Well unless they prove it, the idea that celebrities knew and did nothing isn't new. Its how they stay celebrities. 

The dad thing is odd. But like if a kid is in the position she was in and the parent was able to pick her up afterwards....well wouldn't be the first bad parent. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

anotherdeadblonde
On 12/9/2024 at 4:05 AM, ModernEcstasy said:

I was SA’d for almost 2 years of my childhood. There’s no way I could prove it now. It’d be their word against mine. 
How could it possibly lead to a charge against that person?

the burden of proof in civil and criminal cases is very different. in criminal cases the jury has to find that the defendant is guilty “beyond reasonable doubt.” Civil cases have a  lower standard of guilt and only require the plaintiff to prove their claim with a 51 percent degree of certainty. In many cases where the sexual assault may have taken place a long time ago, lacks physical evidence, etc. victims will opt for a civil case, because they are more likely to produce the 51% degree of certainty result than the “beyond reasonable doubt” part. Consistency in story, therapy records, and witnesses who can attest to the assault and/or its effects can aid in creating this degree of certainty in cases where the more concrete “criminal” evidence (cctv footage, dna evidence, blood panel results, photos of injuries, etc.) may not be available.
 

as a high profile example, Donald Trump lost a civil sexual assault case against a woman who claimed he raped her in the changing room of bergdorf goodman, the criminal statutes had passed, but because trump stated he had “never met that woman” she was able to sue for defamation and sexual battery. Her story remained the same throughout, friends & family attested to her having told them at the time, and there was evidence of them having met prior to the assault. He had to pay damages to her for the assault and distress, but cannot face prison time or be forced to register as a sex offender because he was not found criminally guilty of the crime.

xoxo go piss girl
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...