badmonsterkid 119 Posted September 27, 2024 Share Posted September 27, 2024 Metacritic has the rolling stone review at a 70 however RS gave it a 3.5/4 so wouldn’t that be a 87.5? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
monstertoronto 10,734 Posted September 27, 2024 Share Posted September 27, 2024 58 minutes ago, badmonsterkid said: Metacritic has the rolling stone review at a 70 however RS gave it a 3.5/4 so wouldn’t that be a 87.5? Yes! They clearly don’t use math when translating the ratings but they should when it’s so straightforward like this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
4BLAiNE 1,377 Posted September 27, 2024 Share Posted September 27, 2024 1 hour ago, badmonsterkid said: Metacritic has the rolling stone review at a 70 however RS gave it a 3.5/4 so wouldn’t that be a 87.5? Unfortunately their formatting isn’t great. The score is actually out of five stars - they just don’t show the stars that aren’t scored. If a half is given, the whole star with half filled in is shown - making it look like it’s out of 4. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANVEEROY 62,164 Posted September 27, 2024 Author Share Posted September 27, 2024 69!! DJ HIT THE LIGHTS! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awrah999 4,429 Posted September 28, 2024 Share Posted September 28, 2024 5 hours ago, badmonsterkid said: Metacritic has the rolling stone review at a 70 however RS gave it a 3.5/4 so wouldn’t that be a 87.5? That’s exactly what I said! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awrah999 4,429 Posted September 28, 2024 Share Posted September 28, 2024 4 hours ago, 4BLAiNE said: Unfortunately their formatting isn’t great. The score is actually out of five stars - they just don’t show the stars that aren’t scored. If a half is given, the whole star with half filled in is shown - making it look like it’s out of 4. So there’s a whole missing blank star? If it’s 3.5/4 it should be 87.5. And if it’s 3.5/5 then RS clearly needs a new webpage editor Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
southpaw773 3,793 Posted September 28, 2024 Share Posted September 28, 2024 4 hours ago, monstertoronto said: Yes! They clearly don’t use math when translating the ratings but they should when it’s so straightforward like this. Like a poem said by a lady in red Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefanotta 1,380 Posted September 28, 2024 Share Posted September 28, 2024 Metacritic 69%, is it gonna go even further? Thoughts? My biggest enemy is me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Takox 552 Posted September 28, 2024 Share Posted September 28, 2024 Only 7 reviews so far... I think it can go up to 73-ish See the world with me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefanotta 1,380 Posted October 3, 2024 Share Posted October 3, 2024 We have officially the highest review so far, and it’s from Sputnik Music, 84: https://www.sputnikmusic.com/review/89079/Lady-Gaga-Harlequin/ Metacritic is now 70 My biggest enemy is me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
63grekke 1,440 Posted October 3, 2024 Share Posted October 3, 2024 idk about the reviews but im lovingggg Folie e Deux, The Joker and Happy Mistake.... like whew.. so good Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr S 8,778 Posted October 3, 2024 Share Posted October 3, 2024 Boston Globe has a review that seems positive ish, but metacritic hasn't added it https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/09/30/arts/lady-Gaga-abum-review-joker-harlequin/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nite 5,771 Posted November 15, 2024 Share Posted November 15, 2024 There's a new review that's been added to metacritic: https://www.popmatters.com/lady-gaga-harlequin-review 70/positive. Although reading the review itself is extremely weird to me. "In Taylor Swift terms, Gaga is in her actress era." what Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.