ModernEcstasy 7,570 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago I’m shocked by the lack of taste. People need to watch Eurovision IMMEDIATELY 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NATAH 37,775 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Sneaky Oliver said: sorry but I hate when someone says that! Melodies can sound similar or reminiscent of others but still sound unique. The one from op sounds like a blatant copy It’s getting harder and harder to stand by Katy this era agreed, i feel like that's only a decent excuse if the songs are decades apart and depending on how popular they are mother, what must i do? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LateToCult 38,019 Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Why Will and Rachel’s version kinda ate? it’s bad for her this era. How’d she make Smile look respectable? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kylecarson 0 Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Katy’s “Nirvana” definitely has that familiar feel, but it’s not a direct copy of any one song. It seems like she drew inspiration from a mix of classic rock vibes. When I first heard it, I thought it reminded me of a few different tracks, but it’s still got its own thing going on. If you’re into that style, you’ll probably pick up on some subtle influences, but it’s not just a rehash. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agunimon 21,088 Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 2 hours ago, Sneaky Oliver said: sorry but I hate when someone says that! Melodies can sound similar or reminiscent of others but still sound unique. The one from op sounds like a blatant copy It’s getting harder and harder to stand by Katy this era I don't disagree, but I am speaking from a musical theory outlook on what a melody is, which is specific to the pitch and rhythm. An artist can make a melody sound unique to them in different ways, but the melody itself from a wholistic view was likely already done by somebody else. There's only so many chord progressions in the world and in pop music, artists / producers always tend to gravitate towards specific ones as it is since those are most marketable. Edited 1 hour ago by Agunimon Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poker 3,570 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, kylecarson said: Katy’s “Nirvana” definitely has that familiar feel, but it’s not a direct copy of any one song. It seems like she drew inspiration from a mix of classic rock vibes. When I first heard it, I thought it reminded me of a few different tracks, but it’s still got its own thing going on. If you’re into that style, you’ll probably pick up on some subtle influences, but it’s not just a rehash. It is the same melody, not just a vibe. Kindness rules all. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultimecia 5,779 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago If I were to take a sheet of paper, draw a crude stick figure on it and call it a finished art piece. Would you be able to call it a copy of another stick figure drawing? That's what this song is, it's so basic, uninspired and low effort that you could compare it to billions of other basic songs. Time. It will not wait, no matter how hard you hold on... 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson123 33,821 Posted 39 minutes ago Share Posted 39 minutes ago It wouldn't be the first, second or even third time Dr. Luke does similar stuff to other songs. I don't know how it works when making music there's like a thin line between a rip off and just sounding similar and he has gotten away with it many times. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.