Nessun Dorma 2,373 Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 19 minutes ago, Louvre said: its like comparing mcdonalds to frozen broccoli, neither are great but the mcdonalds has a certain appeal if youre desperate enough for a oonts oonts popstar song Just to be clear Harlequin would be McDonald’s or frozen broccoli? I think just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean it’s not great. You can still dislike jazz music and be able to recognize that the album was well executed, the production is exquisite and Gaga’s vocals are amazing as always. If it doesn’t please your taste that’s okay, but there’s no need to diminish its quality. 4 1 1 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlondeQueenOfGGD 25,454 Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 36 minutes ago, Louvre said: after reading the last few pages i think we need to censor the words "katy" and "perry" on this website for a few months, let the dust settle... No 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louvre 922 Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 10 minutes ago, Nessun Dorma said: Just to be clear Harlequin would be McDonald’s or frozen broccoli? I think just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean it’s not great. You can still dislike jazz music and be able to recognize that the album was well executed, the production is exquisite and Gaga’s vocals are amazing as always. If it doesn’t please your taste that’s okay, but there’s no need to diminish its quality. wasn't trying to diminish its quality, i really appreciate harlequin personally but an average person is not find a ton of personal value in harlequin or 143, and since 143 was created to be appealing it gets to be the mcdonalds in this scenario. Ok maybe the frozen broccoli was not the right analogy, lets call harlequin fish sauce, an acquired but necessary taste 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shyane 1,543 Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 1 hour ago, Louvre said: harlequin had no replay value 56 minutes ago, Louvre said: censor the words "katy" and "perry" on this website I disagree with these two points. 1) whether an album has replay values is very subjective and depends on what type of music one listens to. I genuinely enjoy Gaga's jazz music and other non-pop music (e.g., Joanne). For me, Harlequin has replay value. Also, Gaga's fan population is surely different from GP. I think the GP has not discovered the album yet. Isn't it too early to say that Harlequin does not have replay value? Also, by who's standard? 2) I see many here enjoy talking about celebrities including Katy Perry. Who to say she should be censored? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
julz 5,547 Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 Can we not go against Katy or any other artists in this thread, this is supposed to be a positive thread to celebrate Gaga's chart wins, thats it. Please please please (by SC) 5 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TEANUS 12,456 Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 28 minutes ago, julz said: Can we not go against Katy or any other artists in this thread, this is supposed to be a positive thread to celebrate Gaga's chart wins, thats it. Please please please (by SC) I get what you’re trying to get at, but we’ve actually always discussed the chart performance of other artists here, successful and lackluster both British social ladies with upturned pinkies, glasses clinking // xoxoTEANUS 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just A Holy Fool 2,412 Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 The best chart is Gaga herself and she seems so happy at comfortable with her art at this moment. I am so happy for her. And let’s celebrate that her and Bruno have a song that has been leading Global Spotify for 36 days, the most days at #1 this year. 9 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nessun Dorma 2,373 Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 (edited) 1 hour ago, Louvre said: wasn't trying to diminish its quality, i really appreciate harlequin personally but an average person is not find a ton of personal value in harlequin or 143, and since 143 was created to be appealing it gets to be the mcdonalds in this scenario. Ok maybe the frozen broccoli was not the right analogy, lets call harlequin fish sauce, an acquired but necessary taste I understand your point of view. Even though it can’t be defined as a jazz album, Harlequin undeniably features a lot of jazz songs that aren’t as appealing as pop songs. But even if I wasn’t a Gaga fan, I would definitely prefer Harlequin to 143 based on my music taste. My point is jazz music might never be as popular as pop music, but there’s a big and engaged public that can find lots of personal value in Harlequin. And not only jazz listeners, but soul listeners, rock listeners, blues listeners… The general public hasn’t had the time to discover this album and I believe it will organically grow. It has an amazing ballad with potential to make DWAS numbers. Edited September 30 by Nessun Dorma 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaskar 3,738 Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 I feel like Harlequin hasn’t been discovered by Jazz listeners, solely due to the fact a common jazz listener wouldn’t associate a Lady Gaga album, named after a comic book character, based off a DC movie to be a jazz album. There’s a market for jazz music as well. Even Norah Jones have like 9M monthly listeners. once the movie is out, the album will stabilise. 3 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
QueenChromatix 2,215 Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 15 minutes ago, Zaskar said: I feel like Harlequin hasn’t been discovered by Jazz listeners, solely due to the fact a common jazz listener wouldn’t associate a Lady Gaga album, named after a comic book character, based off a DC movie to be a jazz album. There’s a market for jazz music as well. Even Norah Jones have like 9M monthly listeners. once the movie is out, the album will stabilise. Thinking the same they might say that we're crazy, but i’m just in ❤️ with u Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juanlittlem 41,543 Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 5 hours ago, Real Panda said: Here's a thought for everyone, we should all drop Die With A Smile Dejare de quererte cuando un pintor sordo pinte el sonido de un pétalo al caer en el suelo de cristal de un castillo que no existe. 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Lovegood 22,447 Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 y’all having meltdowns comparing Harlequin and 143 numbers when Harlequin is a Jazz album, Gaga’s extra side project, while 143 is POP music, Katy’s anticipated album. Gaga’s ‘floor’ compared to Katy’s ceiling. They’re not on the same league. Coming off from Love4Sale and Cheek to Cheek, Harlequin is doing FINE. luna’s advocate 3 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Lovegood 22,447 Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 “Coming back with a billboard hot 100 #1 hit with Bruno Mars” oh that’s not.. luna’s advocate 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
River 104,882 Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 checking her socials, you can see a lot of boomers loving the album, I think she's hoping that people will discover the music through the movie so that's why there's a little promo so far, also surprise releases always started with the fans streaming like crazy and then stabilized with the gp. This album is actually very very gp and very american friendly.. I could play the moderator, I can ban you, die sis. 4 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Panda 7,598 Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 Hi, can someone here tell me where U can see the Harlequin album's Spotify numbers? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Posted by FATCAT,
0 reactions
Go to this post