Shyane 1,526 Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 2 hours ago, Economy said: Radio is weird now... ppl listen to it too spuradically so ppl take a long time to get tired of radio songs and take too long to gain familiarity if its not a song they stream The result is extremely slow turn over as its hard for a song to get into heavy play but once its in there it will take a long time for audience to tire of it This means fewer songs will be radio hits going forward as fewer are allowed into heavy play with such slow turn over basically radio doesn't reflect the latest new thing. it reflects what is already recognized as good songs that have been around for a while. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSUNAMI 20,415 Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 4 minutes ago, Juanlittlem said: Music and the bling! Art and charts! Juanlittlem(anager) 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustTea 4,126 Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 49 minutes ago, KennyRichie said: But isn’t this the numbers the new wierdly named album of Katy Perry has per day? I mean it’s absolutely amazing a side non pop mainstream album is doing to accompany a divisive movie. I’ll take it. 143 does 2.5M per day atm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonBaetens 6,738 Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 3 minutes ago, JustTea said: 143 does 2.5M per day atm. Noise, not the bling. when you're lonely, I'll be lonely too / https://www.last.fm/user/SimonBaetens 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shyane 1,526 Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 6 minutes ago, JustTea said: 143 does 2.5M per day atm. but 143's second day was 5M... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyRichie 1,749 Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 4 minutes ago, Shyane said: but 143's second day was 5M... And the third? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyRichie 1,749 Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 11 minutes ago, JustTea said: 143 does 2.5M per day atm. With collabs , singles with videos, that AFL performance, VMAs, etc and a full pop mainstream sound. 4 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonBaetens 6,738 Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 Just now, KennyRichie said: With collabs , singles with videos, that AFL performance, VMAs, etc and a full pop mainstream sound. And a huge controversy! when you're lonely, I'll be lonely too / https://www.last.fm/user/SimonBaetens 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shyane 1,526 Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 2 minutes ago, KennyRichie said: And the third? if I remember correctly, around 3.8M 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shyane 1,526 Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 Just now, Shyane said: if I remember correctly, around 3.8M 143 floated around 3-4M for the rest of the week and then drops to 2-3M which is currently. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilboyblue 3,795 Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 I hope we can move past always comparing Gaga's performance to Katy. It's tiring. And in fact, it seems you all are falling for the trap they're setting up because those albums could not be any more different from each other. 14 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyRichie 1,749 Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 Harlequin is doing more than just fine by its standards, cute album for the meantime 15 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornSimon 4,793 Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 1 minute ago, lilboyblue said: I hope we can move past always comparing Gaga's performance to Katy. It's tiring. And in fact, it seems you all are falling for the trap they're setting up because those albums could not be any more different from each other. Honestly I don't get it. Gaga and Katy are in complete different places professionally, personally and sonically. Comparing them makes zero sense. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juanlittlem 41,511 Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 18 minutes ago, TSUNAMI said: Juanlittlem(anager) Tsunami (you can flood me) Dejare de quererte cuando un pintor sordo pinte el sonido de un pétalo al caer en el suelo de cristal de un castillo que no existe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkgaga 2,763 Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 I really dont get how the different genres suddenly are a reason people are not allowed to be disappointed by the fact the numbers are just bad. 143 is just bad music, so why does it have more streams? Okay, 143 had the performances, but Gaga currently had almost 100M listeners on spotify, and today only 3% of that resulted in streams of Harlequin? Make it make sense Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Posted by FATCAT,
0 reactions
Go to this post