Jump to content
news

Variety: Gaga might campaign for Best Supporting Actress


Bradley
 Share

Featured Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Borisapillar

    3

  • River

    3

  • Bradley

    3

  • FreedomInTheMusic

    2

River

Ryan Gaslighting was the lead in Barbie but was submitted to supporting because the studio determined that he has more chances to win this category than the lead one.

Same for Robert Downey Jr. who actually won the award.

Sometimes it's about the chances to win and not really about the screen time or if the actor is billed as the lead actor.

She most likely not gonna beat the monster actresses in Best Actress..

For ASIB if they submitted her for Supporting, she probably had 2 Oscar's that night.

I could play the moderator, I can ban you, die sis.
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

YourEvilTwin

Clayton Davis is a ****ing joke. Never believe a word that clown says.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Reality

I don't get why some of y'all are so angry about this. First of all, the movie isn't even out yet. She's obviously the female lead of the film, but if the story is mostly told from Arthur's point of view, an argument could be made that she's "supporting." Also, this wouldn't be the first time studios and actors have campaigned to be in a different category. It's happened dozens of times. Is it weird? Sometimes. But nothing to write home about.

It's very much a strategic decision and if she does it, ok. It probably does increase her chances of getting the Oscar tbh. But some of y'all acting like this discredits her artistic integrity are wild. Oscar campaigns are campaigns. It's about playing politics with awards shows and voters. 

𝕀𝕗 𝕪𝕠𝕦 𝕨𝕖𝕣𝕖 𝕒 𝕤𝕚𝕟𝕟𝕖𝕣, 𝕀 𝕔𝕠𝕦𝕝𝕕 𝕞𝕒𝕜𝕖 𝕪𝕠𝕦 𝕓𝕖𝕝𝕚𝕖𝕧𝕖
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

YourEvilTwin
3 minutes ago, Reality said:

I don't get why some of y'all are so angry about this. First of all, the movie isn't even out yet. She's obviously the female lead of the film, but if the story is mostly told from Arthur's point of view, an argument could be made that she's "supporting." Also, this wouldn't be the first time studios and actors have campaigned to be in a different category. It's happened dozens of times. Is it weird? Sometimes. But nothing to write home about.

It's very much a strategic decision and if she does it, ok. It probably does increase her chances of getting the Oscar tbh. But some of y'all acting like this discredits her artistic integrity are wild. Oscar campaigns are campaigns. It's about playing politics with awards shows and voters. 

 

15 minutes ago, River said:

Ryan Gaslighting was the lead in Barbie but was submitted to supporting because the studio determined that he has more chances to win this category than the lead one.

Same for Robert Downey Jr. who actually won the award.

Sometimes it's about the chances to win and not really about the screen time or if the actor is billed as the lead actor.

She most likely not gonna beat the monster actresses in Best Actress..

For ASIB if they submitted her for Supporting, she probably had 2 Oscar's that night.

 

Y'all are taking this way too seriously. Clayton Davis is NOT a credible source by any stretch of the imagination and I can guarantee y'all he pulled this out of his fat ass. Gaga is NOT going supporting.

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Reality
7 minutes ago, YourEvilTwin said:

Y'all are taking this way too seriously. Clayton Davis is NOT a credible source by any stretch of the imagination and I can guarantee y'all he pulled this out of his fat ass. Gaga is NOT going supporting.

I wasn't speaking like it was fact.

𝕀𝕗 𝕪𝕠𝕦 𝕨𝕖𝕣𝕖 𝕒 𝕤𝕚𝕟𝕟𝕖𝕣, 𝕀 𝕔𝕠𝕦𝕝𝕕 𝕞𝕒𝕜𝕖 𝕪𝕠𝕦 𝕓𝕖𝕝𝕚𝕖𝕧𝕖
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

River
11 minutes ago, YourEvilTwin said:

 

 

Y'all are taking this way too seriously. Clayton Davis is NOT a credible source by any stretch of the imagination and I can guarantee y'all he pulled this out of his fat ass. Gaga is NOT going supporting.

I think you’re the one who takes it a bit too seriously.

It’s a possible outcome, supporting or lead, any oscar’s nomination is amazing.

I could play the moderator, I can ban you, die sis.
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Jack3257

Two things to remember about voter psychology.  First, since Phoenix is playing the title character, she will automatically be the second thought for most people who watch the film.  Second, there need to be enough scenes with Gaga where Phoenix isn’t present for her to be a solid leading actress contender.  Phoenix was a working on the film for a while before Gaga started, so chances are he’s in more of the final cut.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Quentin

When I first saw the title of this thread I thought that it was "Gaga might campaign for President" :wtfga::volantis:

Follow every rainbow till you find your dream
  • LMAO 2
  • YAAAS 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Controversiaga

Oh who cares abt these awards anymore 

Pronounced like “Balenciaga” . Emphasis on the “Ga”
Link to post
Share on other sites

RochestrMonstr

This award doesn’t always seem to be consistent with how big/small the parts are. 
 

Catherine Zeta-Jones won Best Supporting Actress for Chicago, and I would definitely think of that as a co-lead. 
 

A really old one, but Meryl herself won this back in 1979 for one of the title roles in Kramer vs Kramer. 
 

But then you have smaller roles like the lady who played the older Rose in Titanic being nominated. 
 

But if her screen time is comparatively less than Joaquin’s, this could be a legitimate thing

Link to post
Share on other sites

godnhat

Anthony Hopkins won his Best Actor with only 16 minutes of screen time. The screentime doesn't necessarily determine whether an actor should be in the main or supporting category. 

Considering her previous nomination in A Star Is Born and her dedication to her craft, I think she should submit herself in the main category if her role is as substantial as expected. A nomination would already be a significant accomplishment for her career, given that not all actresses have received a lead actress nomination, and even fewer have received two.

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

FGGrayson

They dont know how this work lmao, no way a lead will send it for “supporting” lmfao

𝗟𝗮𝗱𝘆 𝗚𝗮𝗴𝗮 • 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘆 𝗠𝗼𝗼𝗿𝗲 • 𝗦𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗶𝗲-𝗘𝗹𝗹𝗶𝘀 𝗕𝗲𝘅𝘁𝗼𝗿 • 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘀 𝗝𝗮𝗰𝗸𝘀𝗼𝗻
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

4SeasonsInADay
  • Film marketed around the two big names
  • Joaquin Phoenix as the POV character
  • One character falling under the influence of the other
  • The "supporting" role getting a little over 70% of the screen time that the "lead" does

Is that Joker 2 or The Master? Philip Seymour Hoffman was considered by many to be a lead but in the awards cycle defaulted to Supporting. Take gender out of it, I wouldn't see this as any different if it happens.

All I hope for is that she gets to go to the Oscars as a double nominee so that her acting gets recognised again. Since an Original Song nomination is considered to be a lock. Having to do that circuit and performance without an acting nomination would suck.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guillaume Hamon

If the best actress in a leading role competition is too tough this year... I'm all for a trick to get us Gaga's second Oscar. :huntyga:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...