RAMROD 116,997 Posted July 21, 2023 Share Posted July 21, 2023 Apple is so perturbed by a United Kingdom surveillance bill that its threatening to flat-out remove iMessage and FaceTime in the U.K. instead of complying with the proposed legislation. The U.K. government is looking to update the 2016 Investigatory Powers Act, the law that governs how security agencies can interfere with privacy to obtain investigatory information. BBC News reported that Apple has said it would remove some services — such as uber-popular communication features like iMessage and FaceTime — if the proposal becomes law, rather than weaken the security of their offerings. Apple has said that it opposes other provisions of the proposed legislation, including having to the tell the U.K,'s Home Office of any product security features before they're released and having to comply with changes like providing a backdoor to end-to-end encryption. Such provisions, Apple argued, purposefully weaken security for its customers. In a submission to the government, The Guardian reported, Apple wrote that the bill would "make the Home Office the de facto global arbiter of what level of data security and encryption are permissible." The Home Office is the part of the United Kingdom's government responsible for security, immigration, and other policies. The promise to cut FaceTime and iMessage is a big threat, setting up the possibility of a major battle between the government and the tech giant. Apple is sending a clear message that it is unwilling to stop end-to-end encryption at the request of a government. The proposed legislation is still under an eight-week consultation period, so nothing is official yet. Other tech companies, such as the encrypted messaging app Signal, have also threatened to walk should these news rules be approved. If Apple follows through with their threat, it'll almost certainly anger U.K. iPhone users. Imagine having an iPhone without Facetime or iMessage. It's like not having an iPhone at all. https://mashable.com/article/apple-facetime-imessage-uk-surveillance-bill https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jul/20/uk-surveillance-law-changes-could-force-apple-to-withdraw-security-features Apple usually would try their best to work with governments. (I.E. the upcoming Apple 15 rumored to get usb C after the EU ordered for universal cable) But since it's sensible for them to defy this one, I believe Apple will not be the only one when this bill is passed (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ ᶠʳᵒⁿᵗ ᵗᵒʷᵃʳᵈ ᵉⁿᵉᵐʸ (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProfessionalClown 10,647 Posted July 21, 2023 Share Posted July 21, 2023 I mean I understand. Privacy and security is definitely well regarded for apple (in most cases) and they take pride it in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 52,838 Posted July 21, 2023 Share Posted July 21, 2023 Curious to see who ppl on this thread will defend and side with... Ppl hate Corporations but they also hate the UK Government... Who do ppl hate more? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 21, 2023 Share Posted July 21, 2023 I support Apple for taking that stance against people who truly do not understand technology thinking that they do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leblanc 2,494 Posted July 21, 2023 Share Posted July 21, 2023 As much as I hate Apple, I'm totally with them on this one and I'd be on this side regardless of who is in power. It could be my ideal candidate as PM and I'd still not want this precedent to occur. Coven Season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Opulence 1,380 Posted July 21, 2023 Share Posted July 21, 2023 I think Apple would look more respectable removing these services vs having consumer privacy at threat. To be honest I doubt it will be missed anyway most people message and call through WhatsApp / IG now anyway Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatography 10,186 Posted July 21, 2023 Share Posted July 21, 2023 1 hour ago, Economy said: Curious to see who ppl on this thread will defend and side with... Ppl hate Corporations but they also hate the UK Government... Who do ppl hate more? apple at least tries to have standards for privacy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GregJA 5,530 Posted July 21, 2023 Share Posted July 21, 2023 Good on Apple! Mr. No Award Winner 2020 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
weed 78,872 Posted July 21, 2023 Share Posted July 21, 2023 get her, Jade! What a gag if iMessage and FT were removed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gabeoz 7,915 Posted July 21, 2023 Share Posted July 21, 2023 As much as I/us want to go against these global megacorps. Apple has made it clear over the past several years that they do have strict standards of personal privacy. I would fully support this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonBaetens 9,470 Posted July 21, 2023 Share Posted July 21, 2023 I always use WhatsApp for texting anyways when you're lonely, I'll be lonely too / https://www.last.fm/user/SimonBaetens Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bionic 50,111 Posted July 21, 2023 Share Posted July 21, 2023 5 minutes ago, SimonBaetens said: I always use WhatsApp for texting anyways WhatsApp is also considering removing service for the same reasons Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpmMonkey 7,715 Posted July 21, 2023 Share Posted July 21, 2023 Cool. I feel like no one uses iMessages in Europe anyway lol saving people, hunting things - the family business Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsleepOnTheCeiling 6,939 Posted July 21, 2023 Share Posted July 21, 2023 2 hours ago, bionic said: WhatsApp is also considering removing service for the same reasons Everyone realizing WhatsApp is facing the same issue as Apple because it revolves around end to end encryption Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.