Jump to content
life

Lady Gaga grocery shopping in Malibu (May 15)


Sarah H

Featured Posts

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply
nATAH
2 hours ago, ALGAYDO said:

Why does she look irritated af :selena:

honestly who doesn't when food shopping :messga:

i hate it so much :messga:

mother, what must i do?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ivy
1 hour ago, XXEENN said:

the shoes were a choice :icant: even for grocery shopping

 

1 hour ago, Cello said:

Love those cute lil slippers she's wearing 

The 2 different types of people :ladyhaha:

Link to post
Share on other sites

chromaticainmyhead

Would it be too much to ask to not publish any threads on GGD anymore that are only made to showcase these invasions of privacy? Just a curious question because I feel like she isn't comfortable with these photos being taken of her while she is clearly not a public figure.
Yes it's the cost of being famous but we could also support her feelings and needs to not promote these invasive photographs by simply not posting any more links and pictures .. I don't know maybe it's also not possible to draw a clear line

fan-tas-tique, chic, freak, slaaaay
Link to post
Share on other sites

Gaby15
54 minutes ago, chromaticainmyhead said:

Would it be too much to ask to not publish any threads on GGD anymore that are only made to showcase these invasions of privacy? Just a curious question because I feel like she isn't comfortable with these photos being taken of her while she is clearly not a public figure.
Yes it's the cost of being famous but we could also support her feelings and needs to not promote these invasive photographs by simply not posting any more links and pictures .. I don't know maybe it's also not possible to draw a clear line

It is clear that in many cases her PR team calls the paps. It is probably part of the agreement that they usually leave her alone. Other times the goal is that a new project doesn't happen out of nowhere, people see her name floating around before. Many times these shopping or barista photos are also probably part of corporate sponsorship contracts.

Other issue, that it seems not a pleasant task for her, but this is part of the business routine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mother of Puppies
5 hours ago, Levine said:

You know you have to be ready when she she started to get seen in public again :excited2:

This was the comment I was looking for :pray:

 

3 hours ago, SimonBaetens said:

Imagine having to write these 'articles' lol:

"The 37-year-old “Stupid Love” pop titan was incognito, wearing a black baseball cap pulled low with a pair of dark sunglasses hiding her eyes. Her blonde hair was pulled back into a bun with some bangs loose and framing her face."

We have eyes, sir/ma'm/themmy. 

I think this could also be for people who are disabled

THEY CALL ME LADY MOP
Link to post
Share on other sites

HookerOnAChurch

She looks great. Where's Michael? Has been a long time since they have been spotted together. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tinnitus15
2 hours ago, chromaticainmyhead said:

Would it be too much to ask to not publish any threads on GGD anymore that are only made to showcase these invasions of privacy? Just a curious question because I feel like she isn't comfortable with these photos being taken of her while she is clearly not a public figure.
Yes it's the cost of being famous but we could also support her feelings and needs to not promote these invasive photographs by simply not posting any more links and pictures .. I don't know maybe it's also not possible to draw a clear line

Those are like “PR stunts”. Her team calls them so she can be spotted. You think someone knows her locations 24/7? I understood it from Taylor. If she doesn’t want to be seen, she WONT be (she was seen leaving the studio with Matty), so here’s an example how they call the paparazzi.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Borisapillar
2 hours ago, chromaticainmyhead said:

Would it be too much to ask to not publish any threads on GGD anymore that are only made to showcase these invasions of privacy? Just a curious question because I feel like she isn't comfortable with these photos being taken of her while she is clearly not a public figure.
Yes it's the cost of being famous but we could also support her feelings and needs to not promote these invasive photographs by simply not posting any more links and pictures .. I don't know maybe it's also not possible to draw a clear line

It’s Gaga Daily what would you like us to discuss

 

and she is ALWAYS a public figure

Link to post
Share on other sites

nATAH
2 hours ago, chromaticainmyhead said:

Would it be too much to ask to not publish any threads on GGD anymore that are only made to showcase these invasions of privacy? Just a curious question because I feel like she isn't comfortable with these photos being taken of her while she is clearly not a public figure.
Yes it's the cost of being famous but we could also support her feelings and needs to not promote these invasive photographs by simply not posting any more links and pictures .. I don't know maybe it's also not possible to draw a clear line

all of the places that would be discussing gaga paparazzi moments, i think GGD is one of the few places she wouldn't mind it being talked about because at least it's her fans being interested instead of the pits of twitter

mother, what must i do?
Link to post
Share on other sites

ProudGayFurry

looks younger than a certain artist which we won't be naming 

Ashe
Link to post
Share on other sites

Levine
6 hours ago, Levine said:

You know you have to be ready when she started to get seen in public again :excited2:

OT but when you guys correct me on this? lmao I'm trying to learn english and this phrase seems wrong. "To get seen"?? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Controversiaga changed the title to Gaga has allegedly purchased all of the groceries in Malibu

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...