BUtterfield 8 40,709 Posted March 6, 2023 Share Posted March 6, 2023 According to the report, the novels have undergone more than 100 edits. Those edits include references to a character being "cheerful" rather than "plump", changing "crazy" to "silly", and completely removing references to villains making victims "slaves. The report also lists some examples from specific titles. Notably, the reissue of 1998's Bride of the Living Dummychanges the ventriloquist dummy from knocking a girl unconscious using a "love tap" to a magic spell instead while the 1996 book Attack of the Jack-O'-Lanterns changes the description of one character, Lee, from being like "the rappers on MTV videos" to "tall and good-looking, with brown skin, dark brown eyes and a great, warm smile. He sort of struts when he walks and acts real cool." Source Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
POP2 4,205 Posted March 6, 2023 Share Posted March 6, 2023 I hate this so much. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nATAH 42,188 Posted March 6, 2023 Share Posted March 6, 2023 i guess i can appreciate the effort to adapt with the times but some of these are almost 30 years old, why bother now mother, what must i do? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
River 104,705 Posted March 6, 2023 Share Posted March 6, 2023 I could play the moderator, I can ban you, die sis. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
COOOK 76,406 Posted March 6, 2023 Share Posted March 6, 2023 Ian Fleming is doing the same with the James Bond novels to remove racist references. But in all honesty who's picking up these books nowadays... Ugh I remember I couldn't get past its covers, my school library had them in the high school/forbidden section and those covers were terrifying and that show they did? Couldn't get past the intro either... Guess they did the job right Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fame 4,076 Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 20 minutes ago, BUtterfield 8 said: the novels have undergone more than 100 edits. Those edits include references to a character being "cheerful" rather than "plump" So basically it implies being plump/fat is such a bad thing we shouldn't even describe a character that way? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
high culture 1,947 Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 One thing if it's getting censored by the government, but if the original author is the one that thinks it ought to change then more power to him. It's his artistic vision. The old books aren't getting burned lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaLa 19,041 Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 I dunno, I guess because I was a huge fan of Nancy Drew growing up this doesn't shock me? Those novels were written in the 1930s and revised in the 50s/60s to remove some racism and other things. I think they might have even been updated again since then. Some of the books I had as a kid were the old, original ones and there was some jarring stuff... It's an interesting debate, because I definitely don't think all books or art or whatever should be sanitized of there historical context, but I guess because theses are books for kids I don't actually have a big problem with it. I think inclusion matters more here Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
likeitrough 5,709 Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 has anyone actually asked for all these famous rewrites? I only ever hear about the outrage after it gets reprinted Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 No... let's instead focus on educating people to be critical readers and consumers in general. Books are a product of their time, for better or for worse, and they should be treated as such. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LateToCult 39,633 Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 In response, JK Rowling has decided to add a new Hispanic character into her new series. She will call her “Elle B. Nurr.” (Don’t come for me. I’m Mexican. ) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 104,053 Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 And that's why I stan. Slappy really slaps (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ 𝘞𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘐 𝘸𝘢𝘴 17 (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
djBuffoon 11,991 Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 3 hours ago, high culture said: One thing if it's getting censored by the government, but if the original author is the one that thinks it ought to change then more power to him. It's his artistic vision. The old books aren't getting burned lol This. Relax, people. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarahb 16,205 Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 10 hours ago, high culture said: One thing if it's getting censored by the government, but if the original author is the one that thinks it ought to change then more power to him. It's his artistic vision. The old books aren't getting burned lol His changes are still stupid and unnecessary imo Edit: never mind he says he has nothing to do with the edits Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronnie 5,405 Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 4 hours ago, high culture said: One thing if it's getting censored by the government, but if the original author is the one that thinks it ought to change then more power to him. It's his artistic vision. The old books aren't getting burned lol His artistic vision? Ha! More like, fear of being cancelled. Leave the work as it was. It was over 30 years ago. Why are we constantly trying to erase history? It’s not like it’s a racist statue or flag. It’s apart of our evolution. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.