Liam SUING Miley

[TheLadyInRed 1,609]

What a flop lol. Can’t wait to see his a** lose in court because that’s what gonna happen 1000%, he’s not even mentionned in the song. What a pathetic c***t 

[Teletubby 148,853]

@InTheCloset change the title to 'Miley Cyrus fans spreading fake rumors to promote Flowers'
https://thetab.com/uk/2023/03/01/miley-cyrus-liam-hemsworth-sued-defamation-flowers-music-video-296917

[InTheCloset 19,600]

16 minutes ago, Teletubby said:

@InTheCloset change the title to 'Miley Cyrus fans spreading fake rumors to promote Flowers'
https://thetab.com/uk/2023/03/01/miley-cyrus-liam-hemsworth-sued-defamation-flowers-music-video-296917

No. The current one gets more interactions. 
Im the new queen of misinformation

[COOOK 76,406]

1 minute ago, InTheCloset said:

Im the new queen of misinformation

[CaliforniaDreamin 788]

8 hours ago, InTheCloset said:

May the odds NEVER be in his favor

Cause cyrusonstats is reliable     Their mom works for the Supreme Court 

[Pablo 7,784]

I know the rumor is fake because it wouldn't slide in court. Imagine all the law suits over breakup albums 

[HermioneT 1,998]

Let's make her album a huge success 

[tyler k 5,330]

8 hours ago, Debithius said:

And what about that article about Johnny Depp? I mean his name wasn't mentioned but everyone knew it was about him, just like with this song. No name but we all know it's about him especially since everyone know that Liam used to play "When I was your man" or whatever the song's name is, for Miley. And since this song is a response to that Bruno song, it pretty obvious who it is about.

again, all speculation.

if nothing is explicit, this will die in court lol 

[XXEENN 1,039]

9 hours ago, Debithius said:

And what about that article about Johnny Depp? I mean his name wasn't mentioned but everyone knew it was about him, just like with this song. No name but we all know it's about him especially since everyone know that Liam used to play "When I was your man" or whatever the song's name is, for Miley. And since this song is a response to that Bruno song, it pretty obvious who it is about.

Those are two totally different situations to be compared - Amber's op-ed was a commentary on how speaking up against sexual violence affected her, which was published AFTER their first trial and after her direct allegations against Johnny and the whole world knew about it. It is more than obvious who the article is about.

This song does not contain any defamatory lyrics be it with or without mentioning any names, that's why I think this whole Liam suing Miley is totally made up by someone, probably a fan.

It's not about whether names are mentioned in particular, there is simply no ground for defamation accusations in Miley's song.

[Shipper 13,077]

10 hours ago, Debithius said:

And what about that article about Johnny Depp? I mean his name wasn't mentioned but everyone knew it was about him, just like with this song. No name but we all know it's about him especially since everyone know that Liam used to play "When I was your man" or whatever the song's name is, for Miley. And since this song is a response to that Bruno song, it pretty obvious who it is about.

The article that Amber wrote was a defamatory article about being sexually abused because Amber said it happened to her in real life. Miley wrote a broke up song about what she will do after a breakup but did not imply if the lyrics are true to life or not. One is published to be "true" and song lyrics don't have the same weight in truth as many singers have creativity licenses.

It isn't only about who the article was implying, but the defamatory content of the article or in this situation, the song. There was nothing defamatory about the lyrics. It is public knowledge they broke up and Miley is mostly singing what she will do and nothing bad about him.

Also, no one wanted Liam for witcher in the first place because it is a big downgrade from Henry Cavill. 

 

[waterfall 797]

Miley rich young and beautiful 

Liam broke old and ugly

[moonsago 7,285]

11 hours ago, tmo13 said:

this is so dramatic lol I bet this isn't even true

how can he sue her for defamation from a song that is only SPECULATED to be about him

messy lmao 

Idk but this reminds me of a story in kpop from last week where a stylist made some claims on instagram that a celebrity owes them 300 pairs of shoes that were borrowed to them throughout the years and kpop fans made some connections ( which were proven to be false later ) and now that celeb’s agency is trying to sue for defamation and I’m like HOWWW they never mentioned that person it was dumb kpop fans that got to that conclusion 

[bluemonkey 639]

[RochestrMonstr 3,186]

It’s like the 2023 version of Carly Simon’s “You’re so Vain! You probably think this song is about You!”

[monstertoronto 10,077]

Truth is a defense to defamation. If she didn’t lie or fabricate anything about him then he has no case. If it’s about the song she literally doesn’t mention him at all.