Kim Petras' 'If Jesus Was A Rockstar' debuts with 361k streams

[TaylorSwift 161,306]

 

 

[HarleyQuinGa2022 105]

Why is this chick who is produced by a rapist getting attention on here? 
 

[nightadieu 4,531]

1 minute ago, HarleyQuinGa2022 said:

Why is this chick who is produced by a rapist getting attention on here? 
 

cause it’s not

[TaylorSwift 161,306]

1 minute ago, HarleyQuinGa2022 said:

Why is this chick who is produced by a rapist getting attention on here? 

it wasn't produced by him

[nswain1110 3,117]

This is a good number for Kim! Love the song. 

[HeavyMetal Halcyon 1,877]

10 minutes ago, HarleyQuinGa2022 said:

Why is this chick who is produced by a rapist getting attention on here? 
 

Good god gurl get a grip 

[Benji 20,113]

11 minutes ago, HarleyQuinGa2022 said:

Why is this chick who is produced by a rapist getting attention on here? 
 

Let’s not when our fave worked with R Kelly and Terry Richardson when there were already many rumours circulating about them.

[ajmsamuel 1,585]

54 minutes ago, Benji said:

Let’s not when our fave worked with R Kelly and Terry Richardson when there were already many rumours circulating about them.

 

[nATAH 56,068]

1 hour ago, Benji said:

Let’s not when our fave worked with R Kelly and Terry Richardson when there were already many rumours circulating about them.

why is this even relevant tbh?  gaga did her apology tour, this doesn't mean we're not allowed to call out other abuser enablers

this website had their pitchforks ready when the richy news broke

[Benji 20,113]

1 minute ago, NATAH said:

why is this even relevant tbh?  gaga did her apology tour, this doesn't mean we're not allowed to call out other abuser enablers

this website had their pitchforks ready when the richy news broke

Because this project doesn’t feature Dr Luke and Kim has moved on.  If someone is going to be called an abuse enabler for someone they worked with historically then we have to be fair and apply that to everyone.

[nATAH 56,068]

5 minutes ago, Benji said:

Because this project doesn’t feature Dr Luke and Kim has moved on.  If someone is going to be called an abuse enabler for someone they worked with historically then we have to be fair and apply that to everyone.

i mean i agree, that user didn't need to randomly come for kim like that due to this being a puke free project but kim hasn't yet publicly denounced dr.puke nor taken any action whilst DWUW has been removed from all possible ways of purchase...

why keep dragging gaga into it? what she did was sh*tty but she followed it up by bringing Me Too to the oscars stage which is pretty ballsy for someone trying to get into acting

when kim decides to apologize and show she means it then i'll pay more attention to her

[Benji 20,113]

25 minutes ago, NATAH said:

i mean i agree, that user didn't need to randomly come for kim like that due to this being a puke free project but kim hasn't yet publicly denounced dr.puke nor taken any action whilst DWUW has been removed from all possible ways of purchase...

why keep dragging gaga into it? what she did was sh*tty but she followed it up by bringing Me Too to the oscars stage which is pretty ballsy for someone trying to get into acting

when kim decides to apologize and show she means it then i'll pay more attention to her

I respect your view, I brought Gaga into it to make the user think whether we have the right to really play moral purity on historical collaborators.  I personally don’t begrudge Gaga for her work with R Kelly and Terry Richardson, it was a choice she made, we make mistakes and that’s fine.

I’ve always given Kim some grace when it comes to working with Dr Luke.  If you were a struggling new artist, would you turn down a good opportunity from a very successful producer due to rumours about them?  I’m not sure I or many people here could honestly say it’s an easy choice to decide to have potentially no career over working with him.

I’m far less forgiving of established artists like Nicki Minaj because they have plenty of options.

[nATAH 56,068]

Just now, Benji said:

I’ve always given Kim some grace when it comes to working with Dr Luke.  If you were a struggling new artist, would you turn down a good opportunity from a very successful producer due to rumours about them?  I’m not sure I or many people here could honestly say it’s an easy choice to decide to have potentially no career over working with him.

I’m far less forgiving of established artists like Nicki Minaj because they have plenty of options.

very much hard agree with the nicki minaj example

i keep seeing very conflicting stories about kim's origin story though. some bestie said she wilfully did it and had plenty of choice? someone else said it was her only choice? i can't keep up lol but what i can do is hope that when she's in a better place of power, she can say her piece without fear of losing it all

maybe one day she could pull a taylor swift and re-record it all without his name anywhere near the songs (and release it on CD )

[ALGAYDO 34,791]

2 hours ago, HarleyQuinGa2022 said:

Why is this chick who is produced by a rapist getting attention on here? 
 

This song wasn’t produced by Luke, so we should give Kim a little break this time around. 
 

of course, even if it was produced by that rapist, most of her fans wouldn’t care because they don’t give a crap about sexual abuse 

[Squidward T 2,447]

The song is meh…clarity era was so good