Fran Drescher celebrates Disney ending COVID vaccine requirement on sets

[Suuus 5,632]

32 minutes ago, HotLikeMexico said:

regarding spreading misinformation - I can't answer that about them.

However this was all I was literally all I was asking for. There so much misinformation about COVID and people are impressionable. Especially keeping people on here better informed. However what comes up about both sources is that the vaccines are effective against COVID. That doesn't take away the fact that the vaccines help.

Sorry for being so abrasive it was because of the lol at the end wich made me feel like you were laughing at me i gues i missunderstood it

[FATCAT 59,222]

3 hours ago, SpiritBunny said:

She can have a seat. Also what did she ever do after The Nanny? I feel like she just fell off the planet immediately.

It's like how Seinfeld didn't do anything bigger than his show, having your own show puts you in a box.

[sillynate 6,170]

First Amy Duncan now Fran Fine? Please these TV moms need to stop forcing me to sign up for emancipation 

 
 

[Suuus 5,632]

1 hour ago, FATCAT said:

It's like how Seinfeld didn't do anything bigger than his show, having your own show puts you in a box.

Fran has done other movies and shows and she has her own foundation cancer cancer schmanser

[TortureMeOnReplay 5,892]

4 hours ago, Suuus said:

The head of pfizer has admitted that the covid vaccine was never tested for spread prevention 

Actually not the head of Pfizer, Pfizer’s president of international developed markets. Also, it was eventually tested for transmission prevention, but this was an indirect effect and Pfizer didn't seek emergency authorization based on transmission but symptoms. The direct goal of the vaccine was to reduce symptoms to the point people stopped dying or having to be hospitalized, although it's pretty obvious that if you can make people asymptomatic then you can reduce transmission, as they're not going to be coughing etc. BUT that probably has never been universally established in medicine because it's too broad so Pfizer would have had to establish it. 

3 hours ago, Edonis said:

So what do you think they tested it for? The earliest studies done with the Pfizer vaccine were focused on safety, efficacy, and then reducing transmission of early variants. Saying otherwise is a common antivaxxx lie that’s spread on the internet thanks to misinformation. 

It actually wasnt focused on transmission. Yes that was the end goal but the trials that got it initially authorized focused on symptoms. 

[HotLikeMexico 4,663]

50 minutes ago, Railing said:

clearly you don't care about sources, given the artist you've chosen to highlight in your avatar

What does that have to do with anything? how is that even relevant?

[HotLikeMexico 4,663]

3 hours ago, Suuus said:

Sorry for being so abrasive it was because of the lol at the end wich made me feel like you were laughing at me i gues i missunderstood it

And I am sorry as well if my comments came off harsher than they were. 

[Meat 18,962]

8 minutes ago, HotLikeMexico said:

What does that have to do with anything? how is that even relevant?

Who is the artist? Now I’m curious 

[skaxboy 4,829]

So disrespect to the iconic Fran Drescher but is she even booked for anything with Disney? Or anything in general?

[Stephen 30,328]

6 hours ago, bionic said:

I thought they pulled them during the production of BLack Panther

Please tell me the capital L was a reference

[FATCAT 59,222]

44 minutes ago, Suuus said:

Fran has done other movies and shows and she has her own foundation cancer cancer schmanser

I'm not saying that she hasn't been successful after her show, just that it's less visible. 

[nATAH 44,174]

5 minutes ago, Meat said:

Who is the artist? Now I’m curious 

Poppy, it's a clip from her music video for blood money

[Edonis 28,827]

16 minutes ago, TortureMeOnReplay said:

It actually wasnt focused on transmission. Yes that was the end goal but the trials that got it initially authorized focused on symptoms. 

For the EUA enabling work, yes. There are multiple sources form 1.5 years+ that corroborates with that. But the way that member worded their post, in context of this thread, made it sound like they were sharing the same rhetoric anti-vaxxers are currently sharing online (which is that the vaccine never shared that end goal, which is unequivocally false). I apologize for jumping in like that, but working in public health and biomed has really warn me out with these kinds of arguments and conversations online tbh

Sorry! @Suuus

[Suuus 5,632]

53 minutes ago, Edonis said:

For the EUA enabling work, yes. There are multiple sources form 1.5 years+ that corroborates with that. But the way that member worded their post, in context of this thread, made it sound like they were sharing the same rhetoric anti-vaxxers are currently sharing online (which is that the vaccine never shared that end goal, which is unequivocally false). I apologize for jumping in like that, but working in public health and biomed has really warn me out with these kinds of arguments and conversations online tbh

Sorry! @Suuus

I didnt mean it like that sorry

[Suuus 5,632]

1 hour ago, HotLikeMexico said:

And I am sorry as well if my comments came off harsher than they were. 

Its hard to tell when your typing instead of actualy verbally saying it to eachother