NYT is shameful and biased

[Bambino 24,321]

 

[Ladle Ghoulash 53,233]

SMH. 

[bionic 50,111]

The articles were written by different people and the linguistics used probably the choice of authors and their personal biases. There are other NYT sources using 'killed'

[StarstruckIllusion 53,567]

17 minutes ago, bionic said:

The articles were written by different people and the linguistics used probably the choice of authors and their personal biases. There are other NYT sources using 'killed'

Not this thread being ate up in just 3 mins 😭☠️

[Nathan 2,079]

Frustrating to me that people don’t know that journalists work at these places and use their own different titles etc…

Thank you to the poster above for showing the link. 
 

Mods: please edit title or close thread 

[Runway 27,876]

53 minutes ago, bionic said:

The articles were written by different people and the linguistics used probably the choice of authors and their personal biases. There are other NYT sources using 'killed'

Well its over

[bionic 50,111]

36 minutes ago, Nathan said:

Frustrating to me that people don’t know that journalists work at these places and use their own different titles etc…

Thank you to the poster above for showing the link. 
 

Mods: please edit title or close thread 

TBH tho you would expect a long standing major publication like NYT to have journalism standards for things like this. They follow international conventions on personal title addresses (i.e. Mr Biden rather than Joe Biden) but don't have any consistency in titles

[skaxboy 6,927]

Are the actual articles written in different narratives? I mean, the headlines are the whole story. Sometimes these news stories are written quickly then updated for the sake of getting the story out. 

[Bambino 24,321]

1 hour ago, bionic said:

The articles were written by different people and the linguistics used probably the choice of authors and their personal biases. There are other NYT sources using 'killed'

This doesn't change that one main article was written in that biased way.

[bionic 50,111]

Just now, Bambino said:

This doesn't change that one main article was written in that biased way.

Isn't that exactly what I said

[Bambino 24,321]

2 minutes ago, bionic said:

Isn't that exactly what I said

Yeah here

18 minutes ago, bionic said:

TBH tho you would expect a long standing major publication like NYT to have journalism standards for things like this. They follow international conventions on personal title addresses (i.e. Mr Biden rather than Joe Biden) but don't have any consistency in titles

 

[Bambino 24,321]

It's just that it's so sad how international media failed Shireen. This is so unfair. She was killed in cold blood and the whole thing was given little to biased attention by western media.

[TEANUS 16,142]

People working 5 days a week can’t afford to eat etc. etc. but today people are mad about the way a writer for NYT worded their article title 

[Bambino 24,321]

19 hours ago, TEANUS said:

People working 5 days a week can’t afford to eat etc. etc. but today people are mad about the way a writer for NYT worded their article title

If you don't have something nice to say, perhaps you shouldn't say anything at all if you're not informed enough. Don't be a part of the problem.

[TEANUS 16,142]

7 hours ago, Bambino said:

If you don't have something nice to say, perhaps you shouldn't say anything at all if you're not informed enough. Don't be a part of the problem.

I think it’s a problem and quite uninformed to blow minor issues out of proportions when the last few years have been the most unpleasant in recent years. I’m saying when there’s already major issues that are literally leaving people dead, without food, murdered for their race, orientation, etc. etc. why focus on minor things that, in this case, don’t have any dimension or depth 

The same newspaper wrote that the same journalist had been “killed”, not just she “dies” in a different article, how does that justify attacking a whole newspaper/ organization for being “shameful and ignorant”?