WWYD if Gaga released her own NFT

[nATAH 48,692]

1 minute ago, PartySick said:

I'd be disappointed and honestly mad about it 'cause NFTs are scummy and she's better than that 

It'd be the first time she'd actually make me mad since I started stanning her

the first time she mad me truly mad the was MR video

a beautiful song that had beautiful visuals in the performances got SNUBBED by that video

[Benji 20,113]

I’d be extremely disappointed.  The whole idea of NFT’s is to make people believe what they’re investing in has a value but it doesn’t; the more people fooled the more the scammers make.  Fueling this would be so against her brand.

[PartySick 159,829]

Just now, NATAH said:

the first time she mad me truly mad the was MR video

a beautiful song that had beautiful visuals in the performances got SNUBBED by that video

Like...mad? Or disappointed?

I've been lowkey disappointed by her plenty (especially with Chromatica please never make Bloodpop the main producer of an album again queen and also go back to cryptic lyrics thank you, love you ) but it's always been something that's easy to shake off 'cause there's plenty coming down the pipeline.

Her joining the NFT crowd would literally make me personally mad at her  and that wouldn't go away so easily

I wouldn't unstan exactly 'cause I'm in too deep with her but it'd definitely damage my rose-tinted view of who Lady Gaga is

Also I thought the MR video was cute 

[nATAH 48,692]

Just now, PartySick said:

Like...mad? Or disappointed?

I've been lowkey disappointed by her plenty (especially with Chromatica please never make Bloodpop the main producer of an album again queen and also go back to cryptic lyrics thank you, love you ) but it's always been something that's easy to shake off 'cause there's plenty coming down the pipeline.

Her joining the NFT crowd would literally make me personally mad at her  and that wouldn't go away so easily

I wouldn't unstan exactly 'cause I'm in too deep with her but it'd definitely damage my rose-tinted view of who Lady Gaga is

Also I thought the MR video was cute 

no i was MAD

[PartySick 159,829]

2 minutes ago, NATAH said:

no i was MAD

The passion

[Fresco 1,688]

I think an nft should have a use, like in a game. Then it could be a playable gamepiece. 

I don't know if this splinterlands / WMG gaming partnership is what is being floated, but I think nft's are here to stay. The more useful  the better, imo. Some blockchains are not as energy intensive as others, just in order to maintain the transaction history in a secure unstealable fasion, which involves 100's of separate, separately operated, validator nodes(web computers) to agree upon the correct transaction history.

https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2022/02/23/warner-music-group-splinterlands-deal/

 

 

[Benji 20,113]

5 minutes ago, PartySick said:

especially with Chromatica please never make Bloodpop the main producer of an album again queen and also go back to cryptic lyrics thank you, love you 

You should be un-modded for this Chromatica slander 

[PartySick 159,829]

1 minute ago, Benji said:

You should be un-modded for this Chromatica slander 

Then @CyanLights has to go for slandering the pink hat album too

[Benji 20,113]

2 minutes ago, Fresco said:

I think an nft should have a use, like in a game. Then it could be a playable gamepiece. 

I don't know if this splinterlands / WMG gaming partnership is what is being floated, but I think nft's are here to stay. The more useful  the better, imo. Some blockchains are not as energy intensive as others, just in order to maintain the transaction history in a secure unstealable fasion, which involves 100's of separate, separately operated, validator nodes(web computers) to agree upon the correct transaction history.

https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2022/02/23/warner-music-group-splinterlands-deal/

 

 

The thing is, in game currencies already exist.  Convincing companies to replace their own in game currencies in favour of NFT’s is a hard sell as they’re more likely to lose income rather than gain as the assumption is an NFT would be transferable.  Also, many gamers would shun NFT’s as it just intensifies one of their biggest grudges with modern gaming; pay to win / pay to flex.

[Benji 20,113]

4 minutes ago, PartySick said:

Then @CyanLights has to go for slandering the pink hat album too

All sacrifices we must make to defend Chromatica.  Sorry Cyan 

[nATAH 48,692]

11 minutes ago, Fresco said:

I think an nft should have a use, like in a game. Then it could be a playable gamepiece. 

I don't know if this splinterlands / WMG gaming partnership is what is being floated, but I think nft's are here to stay. The more useful  the better, imo. Some blockchains are not as energy intensive as others, just in order to maintain the transaction history in a secure unstealable fasion, which involves 100's of separate, separately operated, validator nodes(web computers) to agree upon the correct transaction history.

https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2022/02/23/warner-music-group-splinterlands-deal/

 

 

some people have been creating lies that gaming NFTs means you can carry certain items from game to game which simply... isn't true

microtransactions already generate enough profit a lot easier without the need for something as niche as crypto

[Fresco 1,688]

1 hour ago, Benji said:

The thing is, in game currencies already exist.  Convincing companies to replace their own in game currencies in favour of NFT’s is a hard sell as they’re more likely to lose income rather than gain as the assumption is an NFT would be transferable.  Also, many gamers would shun NFT’s as it just intensifies one of their biggest grudges with modern gaming; pay to win / pay to flex.

There used to be a non-supported market in World of Warcraft. Some people would start an account, play it up to a reasonably high level, then sell it to a different player that just wanted to spend some money and be able to play the higher level challenges without grinding through all the lower stuff. People also used to try to exchange swords and armaments and stuff. Having the character or swords or bracers, etc be an nft would be of value to people when the game is huge and well-developed.  Keeping a massive multiplayer game operating is going to expend lots energy for a long time, even if it is hosted by just 1 company. So, nft's are both perfect for gaming and also very possibly  scammy ... because so many scammers have created the most basic, not fun to play,  games that are at their core pump and dump ponzi-ish schemes.

Good games , fun to play, will have low starter fees( for nft ) and let the players grow into more valuable pieces with game level advancement, and have a huge user base.

PS. the thing that makes them pump and dump is issuing a special game crypto that changes in price. If the nft's market was priced in a stablecoin like busd or dai or usdc then nft could appreciate in value based on the value that it obtained by leveling up in the game, instead of gaining alot when a whale jumps in and runs the price up on just the currency and then jumps out selling the currency cratering the price of the cryptocurrency. The nft value inflates and deflates with whale's manipulation of the special cryptocurrency. IMO.

Pps. There is a big difference between projects where everyone is anonymous, vs projects where the lead devs have a name and a face and intereact with the community. The anonymous projects are more scammy. This is in games tho, beyond a basic nft with an image or song.

 

[Bling 31,356]

3 hours ago, NATAH said:

it's not the digital picture, it's the power needed for the space in the blockchain which is the actual NFT

[Chic 20,830]

Disappointed but not surprised, kind of been the usual with her. Adore her though

[ChicaSkas 22,973]

Download the Jpeg