Dr. Luke had no part in producing “Freaky Deaky”

[Teletubby 145,243]

 

[TimisaMonster 31,073]

So why is he credited? 

[Windowlicker 3,445]

5 minutes ago, TimisaMonster said:

So why is he credited? 

Probably because both Doja and one of the co-producers are signed to his publishing company. Luke taking credit for songs he had no part in is nothing new. It's been going on for over a decade.

[SpiritBunny 3,481]

I still personally wouldn't want to listen to anything with his name attached but that's just me 

[Cookie Tookie 10,546]

 

[AsleepOnTheCeiling 6,201]

41 minutes ago, PropaGaga said:

Probably because both Doja and one of the co-producers are signed to his publishing company. Luke taking credit for songs he had no part in is nothing new. It's been going on for over a decade.

Not saying it's okay, but Gaga had similar stipulations for an executive at Interscope as well who would also get executive producer credits on all her albums. 

[Ziggy 11,463]

56 minutes ago, PropaGaga said:

Probably because both Doja and one of the co-producers are signed to his publishing company. Luke taking credit for songs he had no part in is nothing new. It's been going on for over a decade.

It’s very of the music industry. Look at Hans Zimmer, for instance

[RichAssPiss 4,880]

He's just stealing publishing like a lot of big stars do.

[Versace 7,954]

Well he’s still profiting off the streams, so I’ll say it again unapologetically if you’re going to boycott Kim’s music because of Luke then it makes sense to refrain from streaming anything associated with him. I’m sure Doja will be fine 

[Tiny Purse 1,145]

It literally makes no difference since he will get money from it (and wayyyyy more than he’ll ever get from Kim). If this is making yourself feel better than you should realize you really don’t actually care and just want to villainize Kim.