Teletubby 48,048 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 The man who was pictured as a baby on the cover of Nirvana's Nevermind album has revived his lawsuit against the band after his initial complaint was dismissed by a judge. Spencer Elden, who claims the photo constitutes child ****ography, filed papers on Wednesday, meeting a deadline set by the judge to reinstate his case. https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-59993244 Elden, who is now 30, previously had his case thrown out after failing to respond to a motion to dismiss, filed by Nirvana and their co-defendants last month. "I don't care about facts" ~ @Jill (July 27th, 2021) 4 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
thatfoxyfeeling 10,225 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Such an insult to Kurt Cobain especially after he's profited off being the 'baby' on the album cover over the years. 5 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pussy Like Pepsi 213 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 What a nasty bitch. And how ironic that he is reaching for that $$$ on the album cover too https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b7/NirvanaNevermindalbumcover.jpg 3 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Chesescake 1,841 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 (edited) Edited January 14 by Chesescake 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RudraCNG 10,581 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 He's pathethic. Also, you have to be pretty f***ed in the head to seethat cover as child ****ography, but of course I know he only wants the money. I hope he loses again. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Kimmo 49,178 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Imagine being a 30 lazy year old, who would rather sue for easy money then get to work for his own money… only in America Hottie Detector 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blown Away 5,057 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 That gold digger needs to get the **** out. I can imagine it may have bothered him if it weren't for him recreating the cover not only once, but twice. His intentions are crystal clear. They shipped it, but it got shipped back 2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
berlinforme 3,870 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Blown Away said: That gold digger needs to get the **** out. I can imagine it may have bothered him if it weren't for him recreating the cover not only once, but twice. His intentions are crystal clear. This + also I remember him saying last year(?) how this has haunted him all his life and how embarassing it is for him etc. Dude, if you didn't talk about it all the time and apparently even recreate the cover, people would have no idea you're that baby. Edited January 14 by berlinforme 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Illuminati 14,063 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Life imitates art I guess Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Anderson123 19,616 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Y la perra sigue y sigue. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DrewPa 3,606 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 if you need money so badly it would be better to avoid spending it on lawyers for lost causes. I'm a real Fire CRRRACKERRR 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
AnnaNicoleSmith 22,534 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 4 hours ago, Teletubby said: Spencer Elden, who claims the photo constitutes child ****ography, filed papers on Wednesday, meeting a deadline set by the judge to reinstate his case. Good one, not gonna work Quote Link to post Share on other sites
streamstarcrossed 153 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 (edited) 8 hours ago, Kimmo said: Imagine being a 30 lazy year old, who would rather sue for easy money then get to work I think the lawsuit is absurd, but if all I had to do to be financially set for life was to sue someone, of course I would. There shouldn’t be shame in not wanting to work lmao. Money is money, get it how you can! Edited January 14 by streamstarcrossed 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
HuffsAhoy 7,002 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 He should be arrested for filing a frivolous lawsuit You remind me that it's such a wonderful thing to love. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
skaxboy 1,666 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 (edited) Wouldn’t his parents have consented to the photo and received payments they agreed to? So shouldn’t he be suing his parents? I always thought it was a weird cover but it seems that by him continuing to recreate the photo he is embracing it. If I were embarrassed by it, I wouldn’t acknowledge it but would gladly take any royalties. Edited January 14 by skaxboy 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Trending Now
New Threads
Trending Now
New Threads
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.