Teletubby 60,242 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 The man who was pictured as a baby on the cover of Nirvana's Nevermind album has revived his lawsuit against the band after his initial complaint was dismissed by a judge. Spencer Elden, who claims the photo constitutes child ****ography, filed papers on Wednesday, meeting a deadline set by the judge to reinstate his case. https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-59993244 Elden, who is now 30, previously had his case thrown out after failing to respond to a motion to dismiss, filed by Nirvana and their co-defendants last month. Reveals when?? Results when?? Do we have all submissions?? Do we have all votes?? Am I winning?? 4 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites
thatfoxyfeeling 10,562 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Such an insult to Kurt Cobain especially after he's profited off being the 'baby' on the album cover over the years. 5 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Pussy Like Pepsi 237 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 What a nasty bitch. And how ironic that he is reaching for that $$$ on the album cover too https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b7/NirvanaNevermindalbumcover.jpg 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Chesescake 2,029 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 (edited) Edited January 14 by Chesescake 2 Link to post Share on other sites
RudraCNG 10,790 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 He's pathethic. Also, you have to be pretty f***ed in the head to seethat cover as child ****ography, but of course I know he only wants the money. I hope he loses again. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Kimmo 53,645 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Imagine being a 30 lazy year old, who would rather sue for easy money then get to work for his own money… only in America Hottie Detector 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Blown Away 5,213 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 That gold digger needs to get the **** out. I can imagine it may have bothered him if it weren't for him recreating the cover not only once, but twice. His intentions are crystal clear. They shipped it, but it got shipped back 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites
berlinforme 4,114 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Blown Away said: That gold digger needs to get the **** out. I can imagine it may have bothered him if it weren't for him recreating the cover not only once, but twice. His intentions are crystal clear. This + also I remember him saying last year(?) how this has haunted him all his life and how embarassing it is for him etc. Dude, if you didn't talk about it all the time and apparently even recreate the cover, people would have no idea you're that baby. Edited January 14 by berlinforme 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Illuminati 14,171 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Life imitates art I guess Link to post Share on other sites
Anderson123 21,230 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Y la perra sigue y sigue. 3 Link to post Share on other sites
DrewPa 3,647 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 if you need money so badly it would be better to avoid spending it on lawyers for lost causes. I'm a real Fire CRRRACKERRR 4 Link to post Share on other sites
AnnaNicoleSmith 26,829 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 4 hours ago, Teletubby said: Spencer Elden, who claims the photo constitutes child ****ography, filed papers on Wednesday, meeting a deadline set by the judge to reinstate his case. Good one, not gonna work Link to post Share on other sites
streamstarcrossed 409 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 (edited) 8 hours ago, Kimmo said: Imagine being a 30 lazy year old, who would rather sue for easy money then get to work I think the lawsuit is absurd, but if all I had to do to be financially set for life was to sue someone, of course I would. There shouldn’t be shame in not wanting to work lmao. Money is money, get it how you can! Edited January 14 by streamstarcrossed 1 Link to post Share on other sites
HuffsAhoy 7,428 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 He should be arrested for filing a frivolous lawsuit You remind me that it's such a wonderful thing to love. Link to post Share on other sites
skaxboy 1,926 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 (edited) Wouldn’t his parents have consented to the photo and received payments they agreed to? So shouldn’t he be suing his parents? I always thought it was a weird cover but it seems that by him continuing to recreate the photo he is embracing it. If I were embarrassed by it, I wouldn’t acknowledge it but would gladly take any royalties. Edited January 14 by skaxboy 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Trending Now
New Threads
Trending Now
New Threads
Featured Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now