Madonna had to clean the theater after watching Licorice Pizza

[Guest]

1 hour ago, RichAssPiss said:

Some people enjoy things about movies besides blanket moralism. 

Yep u and pedos. 

[Guest]

2 hours ago, Meat said:

Brigitte Macron: Welcome to the club! 

[Dojo 19,372]

4 hours ago, Chic said:

Lmao @ Madge being inspired by a movie about an older woman grooming a young boy  Bit on the nose?

 

3 hours ago, MADDONNA said:

That her life

 

3 hours ago, Not Chrissy Teigen said:

no wonder madonna loved it 

lmaao, i-

 

 

[proxy 851]

2 hours ago, Meat said:

It still came from her mind. It’s disgusting to fantasise about ****ing a pre-pubescent boy. 

Yeah and authors who write about killing someone are murders themselves, that must be it

[Not Chrissy Teigen 59]

3 hours ago, HuffsAhoy said:

Last time I checked, she's never groomed underage boys. Y'all just jealous she's in her mid-60's and still bagging hotties left and right

then check her writing about how fun sex with underage boy is. and since when rich old person dating someone young is a flex?

[RichAssPiss 4,957]

1 hour ago, urgirl said:

Yep u and pedos. 

What is your argument even? Photographing a movie with a cast of adults is not pedophilia. Making a piece of art among adults is not harming a child.

[HuffsAhoy 7,433]

7 minutes ago, Not Chrissy Teigen said:

then check her writing about how fun sex with underage boy is. and since when rich old person dating someone young is a flex?

Please see my previous reply to another user who tried to pull this nonsense

[insight 2,443]

3 hours ago, Meat said:

This was a book of sexual fantasies...it says so in the beginning. Literalism is obviously running rampant these days.

[Not Chrissy Teigen 59]

1 minute ago, HuffsAhoy said:

Please see my previous reply to another user who tried to pull this nonsense

 nonsense in what way? she wrote it and it's in her book. all i said she is the author of pedo story that liked another pedo story which is 100% true

[magichat 519]

What in the hell?

[Guest]

9 minutes ago, RichAssPiss said:

What is your argument even? Photographing a movie with a cast of adults is not pedophilia. Making a piece of art among adults is not harming a child.

That some things are so disgusting the name of ‘art’ can’t redeem it. 120 days of sodom and Lolita were filmed legally but the child rape depiction kills any other merit the movies may have, some things are too sick and evil to be swallowed, plus the fact that no matter what stance the film takes to the events, there will always be many many sickos in the world searching out these kinds of ‘artistic and rulebreakjng’ movies to fuel their own poisonus perversions. I’m anti-child rape in movies. In fact I’m anti rape in movies period. Too many sickos using it as **** and way way too little of ‘good message’ payoff, there’s basically none. 

[HuffsAhoy 7,433]

3 minutes ago, insight said:

Literalism is obviously running rampant these days

Unfortunately, it's a result of a lack of proper reading education in all areas of elementary, middle, and high school. Today's generation has zero ability to critically think about literature in a metaphorical sense. They only want to see what's "on the surface" instead of putting their brains into high gear and differ deeper. As an English instructor, it's very unsettling. 

[Guest]

Just now, urgirl said:

That some things are so disgusting the name of ‘art’ can’t redeem it. 120 days of sodom and Lolita were filmed legally but the child rape depiction kills any other merit the movies may have, some things are too sick and evil to be swallowed, plus the fact that no matter what stance the film takes to the events, there will always be many many sickos in the world searching out these kinds of ‘artistic and rulebreakjng’ movies to fuel their own poisonus perversions. I’m anti-child rape in movies. In fact I’m anti rape in movies period. Too many sickos using it as **** and way way too little of ‘good message’ payoff, there’s basically none. 

I don’t know why that was censored p00rn. See the world ‘P O R N “ is something I’m against censoring. But films romanticizing child P O R N yep censor the **** out of them 

[insight 2,443]

5 minutes ago, Not Chrissy Teigen said:

 nonsense in what way? she wrote it and it's in her book. all i said she is the author of pedo story that liked another pedo story which is 100% true

Wrong post

[HuffsAhoy 7,433]

3 minutes ago, urgirl said:

That some things are so disgusting the name of ‘art’ can’t redeem it. 120 days of sodom and Lolita were filmed legally but the child rape depiction kills any other merit the movies may have, some things are too sick and evil to be swallowed, plus the fact that no matter what stance the film takes to the events, there will always be many many sickos in the world searching out these kinds of ‘artistic and rulebreakjng’ movies to fuel their own poisonus perversions. I’m anti-child rape in movies. In fact I’m anti rape in movies period. Too many sickos using it as **** and way way too little of ‘good message’ payoff, there’s basically none. 

You sound like those conservatives from the 1980s moaning about Satanism overtaking every aspect of daily life  Just because you're unable to grapple with the horrors of the world, doesn't mean they shouldn't be depicted in art.