Werk 13,165 Posted July 9, 2021 Share Posted July 9, 2021 She'll be getting more money with the film though so she wins!: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
weed 67,460 Posted July 9, 2021 Share Posted July 9, 2021 I love the concept but very dumb, I'd be surprised if they won anything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prostitute Barbie 4,022 Posted July 9, 2021 Share Posted July 9, 2021 Dula Peep the felon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcadia 1,366 Posted July 9, 2021 Share Posted July 9, 2021 Lol first of all, it’s a photo of herself. Second, she’s not profiting from the photo. It’s just social media post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed 707 Posted July 9, 2021 Share Posted July 9, 2021 Whoever took or purchased the photo owns it so if she used it without permission then the lawsuit is warranted. with that said, this is frivolous and unnecessary but she got the coins so people are going to come for them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gypsy101 5,423 Posted July 9, 2021 Share Posted July 9, 2021 completely ridiculous though it's technically maybe legal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUtterfield 8 38,759 Posted July 9, 2021 Share Posted July 9, 2021 14 minutes ago, gypsy101 said: completely ridiculous though it's technically maybe legal It is legal lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gypsy101 5,423 Posted July 9, 2021 Share Posted July 9, 2021 6 minutes ago, BUtterfield 8 said: It is legal lol which is ridiculous, it's a photo of her Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhHenny2020 2,822 Posted July 9, 2021 Share Posted July 9, 2021 8 minutes ago, gypsy101 said: which is ridiculous, it's a photo of her It's a hard-knock life for us It's a hard-knock life for us 'Stead of treated We get tricked 'Stead of kisses We get kicked Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimisaMonster 31,073 Posted July 9, 2021 Share Posted July 9, 2021 This is just like MJ by the Beatles music publishing rights when Paul McCartney is still alive... The industry is so weird...and this is just plain silly... These paps are insane... Stream my new single, 💜"Heartbeat"💜, on Spotify! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JusKeepBreathin 19,311 Posted July 9, 2021 Share Posted July 9, 2021 A reverse meta paparazzi experience. Stream this hit... "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King Jr. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 137,018 Posted July 9, 2021 Share Posted July 9, 2021 44 minutes ago, TimisaMonster said: This is just like MJ by the Beatles music publishing rights when Paul McCartney is still alive... The industry is so weird...and this is just plain silly... These paps are insane... Fun fact: The part of Sony/ATV MJ controlled also bought the rights to others' catalogues. My favorite example of that is the buyout of Famous Music. Eminem slammed MJ in his song Just Lose It but Michael ended up owning the rights to his music and, therefore, made money every time that song was played gotta love a business man OT: The legality of the music business (and celebrity culture) is pretty crazy really. Imagine someone owning the rights to a picture of your face 💚 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oriane 19,002 Posted July 9, 2021 Share Posted July 9, 2021 And did they ask for her consent before taking her photo? Maybe make a law against that too. You popped my heart seams, all my bubble dreams Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FFXIV WhiteMage 4,986 Posted July 9, 2021 Share Posted July 9, 2021 3 hours ago, Reed said: Whoever took or purchased the photo owns it so if she used it without permission then the lawsuit is warranted. with that said, this is frivolous and unnecessary but she got the coins so people are going to come for them. Same thing happened with Gigi but the paparazzi did not win the lawsuit. "Gigi Hadid, an international supermodel and online influencer, had a similar conflict with Xclusive, but instead of settling, she is taking this issue to court. The memorandum in support of Hadid states that she did not infringe on Xclusive’s copyright, as she was the subject of the photograph, and contributed significant creative elements that copyright law seeks to protect. This is interesting, as the memorandum may be claiming that the photograph was a joint work between her and Xclusive. In order for a copyrighted work to be joint, it must be prepared by two or more authors with the intention that their contributions be merged into inseparable or interdependent parts of a unitary whole. Hadid claims that her creative choices, such as posing for the camera or choosing a flattering outfit, should be considered a preparation of the work." source Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
INNA 3,550 Posted July 9, 2021 Share Posted July 9, 2021 2 hours ago, OhHenny2020 said: It's a hard-knock life for us It's a hard-knock life for us 'Stead of treated We get tricked 'Stead of kisses We get kicked I never knew these lyrics until you typed them here fragment-fragment--bul-uh...scab-uh..fragment-foot, bullet fragment foot bich! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trending Now
New Threads
Trending Now
New Threads
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.