Jump to content
music news

New Grammy Rules


Lighter

Featured Posts

Bradley

Wait, does this mean a very minor credited songwriter for an amazing album that is not majorly made by that person might actually win AOTY? :air:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply
JusKeepBreathin
2 hours ago, Aphasic said:

Next, even the people who cater food will be eligible :ladyhaha:

So if you use a sample from a previous song and it wins SOTY the person who produced the previous song gets a Grammy. :billie:

 

oprah lol GIF by Amy Poehler's Smart Girls

 

"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King Jr.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Aphasic
4 minutes ago, JusKeepBreathin said:

So if you use a sample from a previous song and it wins SOTY the person who produced the previous song gets a Grammy. :billie:

 

oprah lol GIF by Amy Poehler's Smart Girls

 

It kinda seems that the Scammys just created a hole that indeed could grant Grammys to songs sampled. 😂

Link to post
Share on other sites

JusKeepBreathin
2 hours ago, Lucas said:

So you can write 1 line on a whole album and win a Grammy? :wtf:
Not sure how I feel about this one

That'd be 72 Grammy's for Beyoncé's Lemonade for example, just for the songwritting :sweat: Add producers, engineers etc and it's a fkin mess

What of that lines was, "woah woah, yeahhhhh?"

 

 

"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King Jr.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Kadikaado

Grammy, always changing for the worst.

I am authistic, so don't be offended if I make a mess sometimes.
Link to post
Share on other sites

androiduser
4 hours ago, Bradley said:

Wait, does this mean a very minor credited songwriter for an amazing album that is not majorly made by that person might actually win AOTY? :air:

it also means Gaga can change one line in somebody else's song and win for the other person's album

Link to post
Share on other sites

PussOfYonce
5 hours ago, Bio said:

You do know that 25 of those 72 writers come from samples used in the songs right? It's not like they wrote the album lol

yeah Beyonce used alot of samples, she didn't really make other people write the album for her, she did get people but she obviously helped with the process and the overall vision not to mention in writing some of the songs

✨ puthy tight, puthy clean, puthy fresh ✨
Link to post
Share on other sites

StrawberryBlond

Not a fan of this rule at all. I never view those smaller credits as counting towards an artist's Grammy nominations. I always thought it would be bittersweet to win your first ever Grammy as part of a tiny writing credit on another person's album. Especially if that was the only one you ever won, you'd forever question for the rest of your life if you do technically have a Grammy or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chic
4 hours ago, JusKeepBreathin said:

So if you use a sample from a previous song and it wins SOTY the person who produced the previous song gets a Grammy. :billie:

 

oprah lol GIF by Amy Poehler's Smart Girls

 

Katy has a chance now!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bradley
15 hours ago, androiduser said:

it also means Gaga can change one line in somebody else's song and win for the other person's album

It sounds ridiculous to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Living

I mean, so? I don’t understand how even after the ex president of the Grammys confirmed that it was fake people still praise them :enigma:

 

It doesn’t matter what the new rules are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...