Lighter 15,376 Posted April 26, 2021 Author Share Posted April 26, 2021 33 minutes ago, StarstruckIllusion said: No... y’all don’t get it This is super corrupt Hes credited as a songwriter for 3 songs but after the AOTY nom, they’re retroactively claiming he produced 7 songs (you need a bare minimum of 1/3rd of producing credits to get a grammy), even tho they never claimed that on release. Whether it’s that, or hiding the fact he made 7 songs and didn’t get credit looks really bad The way they got away with it. The Taylor stanbase is shook. He should not have got this grammy. This looks bad on him, Taylor, and her team. “For albums containing at least Songwriter(s) of new material with at least 33% playing time of the album” - Grammys Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarstruckIllusion 52,915 Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 3 minutes ago, spector said: source? my bestie who’s a huge taylor stan. i sent her this thread and she went off. she’s really bothered and disappointed and ofc she spenrs days trying to justify this but she cant and others in the fandom cant either Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 3 minutes ago, Forbidden Love said: I mean he wrote a bunch of Lover with her and the vast majority of it is love songs No he didn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarstruckIllusion 52,915 Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 3 minutes ago, Lighter said: “For albums containing at least Songwriter(s) of new material with at least 33% playing time of the album” - Grammys he was credited on only 3 songs on printed copies of the album this isnt up for debate 😭 there is no way he should have a grammy rn Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatography 10,186 Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 36 minutes ago, StarstruckIllusion said: No... y’all don’t get it This is super corrupt Hes credited as a songwriter for 3 songs but after the AOTY nom, they’re retroactively claiming he produced 7 songs (you need a bare minimum of 1/3rd of producing credits to get a grammy), even tho they never claimed that on release. Whether it’s that, or hiding the fact he made 7 songs and didn’t get credit looks really bad The way they got away with it. The Taylor stanbase is shook. He should not have got this grammy. This looks bad on him, Taylor, and her team. so when do we care when the grammys are corrupt? we don’t care when it has to do with gaga winning anything, and people made fun of the weeknd for boycotting the grammys. but now since taylor retroactively added joe as a producer to also win its suddenly the most corrupt thing? either we care about the grammys or we don’t, it’s so annoying that this fan base likes to pick and choose to suit their argument. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarstruckIllusion 52,915 Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 1 minute ago, Chromatography said: so when do we care when the grammys are corrupt? we don’t care when it has to do with gaga winning anything, and people made fun of the weeknd for boycotting the grammys. but now since taylor retroactively added joe as a producer to also win its suddenly the most corrupt thing? either we care about the grammys or we don’t, it’s so annoying that this fan base likes to pick and choose to suit their argument. this is not comparable to Gaga winning a grammy. this was a decision from taylor’s camp to submit a request to change the credits. the production receipts of folklore on was only changed a few weeks ago on Spotify Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarstruckIllusion 52,915 Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 Anyways here’s the discussion by Swifties on reddit to prove I’m not crazy. half of the stans just wanna act dumb so Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Future Lovers 6,965 Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 9 minutes ago, Agunimon said: No he didn't. No you're right he didn't, that's my bad. For some reason I thought that's when their creative partnership began but it was folklore. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lighter 15,376 Posted April 26, 2021 Author Share Posted April 26, 2021 12 minutes ago, StarstruckIllusion said: he was credited on only 3 songs on printed copies of the album this isnt up for debate 😭 there is no way he should have a grammy rn They just added his name as producer for 6 songs on all streaming platforms, so technically he’s eligible now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
zakariah 11,722 Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 their first baby together to many more! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarstruckIllusion 52,915 Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 1 hour ago, Lighter said: They just added his name as producer for 6 songs on all streaming platforms, so technically he’s eligible now not you saying that all nonchalant. Imagine RedOne suddenly claiming he wrote half of Chromatica tomorrow. Does that not sit wrongly w y’all? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose P 23,341 Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 1 hour ago, Agunimon said: Oh! I didn’t realize it was in relation to production. The Taylor stans seem to not support this from what I am seeing, though. I’m seeing more “this isn’t okay” than praise. That’s because it’s not adding up with what she had previously revealed about the amount of involvement he had in the album. Now all of a sudden she’s given him just enough credits for him to qualify for the Grammy. It’s just very clear what she’s intending to do here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
spector 1,919 Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 i think everyone making implicit or explicit accusatory statements should be more mindful and take into account that taylor swift is the epitome of artistic integrity. she went through the reputation era and is now fighting for the ownership of her body of work (re-recordings). she has never been the one to cheat their way to win anything. she’s always upfront. i suggest, this time, when she makes a statement, speaks up, and clears the situation, we believe and listen to her (there may be legal issues/loopholes going on in the background, we just don’t have enough information). stella + elliot = stelliot Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Living 1,583 Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 9 hours ago, StarstruckIllusion said: No... y’all don’t get it This is super corrupt Hes credited as a songwriter for 3 songs but after the AOTY nom, they’re retroactively claiming he produced 7 songs (you need a bare minimum of 1/3rd of producing credits to get a grammy), even tho they never claimed that on release. Whether it’s that, or hiding the fact he made 7 songs and didn’t get credit looks really bad The way they got away with it. The Taylor stanbase is shook. He should not have got this grammy. This looks bad on him, Taylor, and her team. You know that the record labels pay for the Grammys.. right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFame Monster 8,949 Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 3 hours ago, Living said: You know that the record labels pay for the Grammys.. right? While this could be true, there is no validity to this statement. Just something stans throw around whenever they’re upset about something related to the Grammys Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.