Bhad Bhabie makes $1M in 6 hrs on OnlyFans

[xoxo Craig 55,649]

Well then... should I make an OF?   

 

Seriously... its a bit creepy how she makes all that money, knowing that its old creepy men waiting for her to turn 18 so they can pounce on her like a lion in the wild. What's a just-turned 18 year old doing with an OnlyFans anyway? She really ought to be educated on things before she goes and does whatever 

[weed 74,483]

so gross lol 

[Hyoha 1,613]

8 hours ago, funkyhaus said:

Onlyfans should be 21+...
This is kinda gross 

Agreed. And all these people like “yas sis get them coins” while simultaneously calling her subscribers pedos - they’re also part of the problem.

[HEARTSTOP 3,152]

8 hours ago, Xoxo Adriana said:

literally!

their mentality is that she's at a legal age, however its the part where she was underage not even a few weeks ago that irks me about these men. I think she has the right to do as she pleases, so it shouldn't be her issue, but it's concerning in the sense that its gonna attract creeps and PDFs that think its okay to perv on her just because she's barely legal. ew.

Yup, these people would want to f*ck her if it was legal at 12. I've seen those comments when she first got famous and they didn't know her age. Just...ewww

[Economy 50,361]

8 hours ago, Xoxo Adriana said:

legally, no. however morally imo it very pedophilic.

that girl was underage a week ago, not to mention she looks way younger than 18. it's for sure gonna attract p*dos who think its okay since she's 18 now.

Tbh. Ita a legal technicality. From a moral standpoint it gets more fuzzy id say

 

So the day before ur birthday ur not legal and its pedophelia but in a 24 hour period it all changes???? Ur maturity or age doesnt change cuz of 1 day. But laws work like that, they are specific set lines and thresholds. Principles and ethics on the otherhand got more common sense

 

If ur 45 and creeping a girl that just turned 18 to me thats still messed up even if ur not technically breaking the law

 

[Economy 50,361]

41 minutes ago, Hyoha said:

Agreed. And all these people like “yas sis get them coins” while simultaneously calling her subscribers pedos - they’re also part of the problem.

Tbh. If something is morally questionable in your view the person that puts themselves out there is also responsible not just the ppl vieweing it. It becomes a 2 way street

 

U can at least argue at 18 shes less experienced and wise than older ppl should be so in that sense ill still put a bigger chunck of the blame on the creepy adults. But still shes 18 not 8, its not like shes oblivious to what shes doing. She knows exactly what shes doing and capitalizing on it...

 

So either its ok or its not. I dont think u can criticize one and not the other. The giving and receiving party are both willing participants here and either its shameful for both or its not.

[buzzkill 5,157]

Not all those conservatives people saying what a woman should or shouldn’t do with her body/image. 

[djBuffoon 12,128]

I have an immediate disdain for people who broadcast their money to the world. Extremely tacky.

[ThisGuyTony 31,086]

I’m more surprised that she just turned 18.  I thought she was at least 20 years old. 

[Xoxo Adriana 15,040]

2 hours ago, Economy said:

Tbh. Ita a legal technicality. From a moral standpoint it gets more fuzzy id say

 

So the day before ur birthday ur not legal and its pedophelia but in a 24 hour period it all changes???? Ur maturity or age doesnt change cuz of 1 day. But laws work like that, they are specific set lines and thresholds. Principles and ethics on the otherhand got more common sense

 

If ur 45 and creeping a girl that just turned 18 to me thats still messed up even if ur not technically breaking the law

 

exactly this, took the words right out of my mouth! 

i think there needs to be some restriction/law put in place towards this. much older men who are aroused by barely legal teen girls clearly don’t have the best intentions. 

must f**ked up and really gross. however unfortunately we cannot do much towards this.

[Kadikaado 4,302]

I had to google who was her. Disgusting, but since she is over 18 now, it's her life to enjoy or to ruin it. The peoplke subscribing: eeew!!

[Versace 7,981]

9 hours ago, gag said:

Literally not a single person in this thread is shaming her? Everyone is saying “good for her” but also wary of the creeps that were waiting for her to turn legal.

What does any of this have to do with political correctness 

Because it's painting a bad narrative for her. Instead of making her feel empowered, some comments are painting her as a victim. If this was an 18 year old boy that attracted the attention of female watchers, we would't be having this conversation and you know it. 

[StrawberryBlond 14,926]

Highly disturbing that she maybe even had her page on dormant until she was 18. That's why some creators have subscribers before they've even posted content. It's so people know an upcoming name and sign up early. Which means she could've potentially joined before her birthday. And she may have also taken the photos she posted 24 hours before turning 18, let's be real. 18 may be legal but it's still super young to make such a monumental decision and when the world has known you since you were underage, it becomes borderline immoral for them to lust over you just after you become legal. Reminds me of the day when certain British newspapers that had topless models on page 3 would have a counter in the upper corner of the pages counting down the days until an upcoming model was turning 16 (the legal age to pose topless in the UK). How that was ever allowed is beyond me. I dread to think how many of these subscribers are fathers who have unhealthy obsessions with counting down the days until certain child stars become legal. Makes you wonder how they view their own daughters.

[Chic 20,830]

Just now, StrawberryBlond said:

Highly disturbing that she maybe even had her page on dormant until she was 18. That's why some creators have subscribers before they've even posted content. It's so people know an upcoming name and sign up early. Which means she could've potentially joined before her birthday. And she may have also taken the photos she posted 24 hours before turning 18, let's be real. 18 may be legal but it's still super young to make such a monumental decision and when the world has known you since you were underage, it becomes borderline immoral for them to lust over you just after you become legal. Reminds me of the day when certain British newspapers that had topless models on page 3 would have a counter in the upper corner of the pages counting down the days until an upcoming model was turning 16 (the legal age to pose topless in the UK). How that was ever allowed is beyond me. I dread to think how many of these subscribers are fathers who have unhealthy obsessions with counting down the days until certain child stars become legal. Makes you wonder how they view their own daughters.

Yeah, are we really expected to believe that all of these subscribers just happened to become aware of her existence the day she turned 18? Pretty disturbing.