Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
society

Oprah with Meghan and Harry - Discussion Thread


Morphine Prince

Featured Posts

2 minutes ago, Rolodex of Hate said:

I actually just really don't know how to feel tbh - on the one hand I do certainly sympathise with Harry and Meghan as the royal family is definitely flawed, and I don't doubt there was racism within the family. However, to me most of it just seems like a family argument, and there are always two sides to every story. We will likely not get to hear the royal family's side of the story because they don't really get involved in things like this, and that's why I think it was a bit poor of Harry and Meghan to take it so public, embarrassing the queen and the monarchy. 

On the contrary, they seem to be really invested in this unlike when one of their own got exposed as a p*edophile. Double standards much? :air:

🌹 free britney 🌹
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 307
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Rolodex of Hate

Also, I feel Oprah could have been a bit harsher - for example, when Meghan mentions that there were concerns surrounding Archie's skin colour, Oprah just acted shocked, but didn't question the intention behind it. Perhaps they were just pondering the baby's general appearance?

I don't doubt that Meghan experienced racism, but to suggest Archie wasn't going to be made a prince because of him not being 100% white is ludicrous - the royal family would never be allowed to do that. They have been trying to cut down on the amount of royals made princes etc because there are so many children, so I think this may have been the reason why Archie wouldn't have received a title. 

We have no legal choice but to stan
Link to post
Share on other sites

Rolodex of Hate
1 minute ago, Edu said:

On the contrary, they seem to be really invested in this unlike when one of their own got exposed as a p*edophile. Double standards much? :air:

Because there wasn't really anything up for debate, they condemned his actions? Whereas in this case two people are making various claims against them?

We have no legal choice but to stan
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rolodex of Hate said:

Because there wasn't really anything up for debate, they condemned his actions? Whereas in this case two people are making various claims against them?

They condemned his actions by swiping everything under the rug? Okay, sis. :air:

🌹 free britney 🌹
Link to post
Share on other sites

TaylorSwift
12 minutes ago, Rolodex of Hate said:

They have been trying to cut down on the amount of royals made princes etc because there are so many children, so I think this may have been the reason why Archie wouldn't have received a title. 

 Meghan and Harry's son would only receive royal title when Charles ascends to the throne. The children of the Queen, the male-line grandchildren, and the children of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge (William and Catherine) are entitled to go by the title “Prince/Princess.”
Archie as great-grandchildren so did not qualify for title.  Harry probably didn't inform Meghan about it. 

https://store.taylorswift.com
Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Miss Dolly said:

It’s not sexism. I just don’t like her. With the stories I heard just put me off her. The fact she married her ex husband to further her career then when she got the role she wanted she ditched him out of the blue and she mailed him her wedding ring. 

That has nothing to do with this marriage sorry. What if she actually loves Harry, huh? These stories of yours are potentially irrelevant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HuffsAhoy
22 minutes ago, Rolodex of Hate said:

the royal family would never be allowed to do that.

The same royal family that has literally built an empire off racism?

Sure Jan GIF

You remind me that it's such a wonderful thing to love.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Better Day
4 minutes ago, Rio said:

That has nothing to do with this marriage sorry. What if she actually loves Harry, huh? These stories of yours are potentially irrelevant.

She doesn’t. She’s an actress. 

Together You And I!
Link to post
Share on other sites

PunkTheFunk
4 hours ago, StarstruckIllusion said:

Let’s all agree to forget Gaga validated the royal family multiple times okay :vegas:

Gaga is cancelled :vegas:

Link to post
Share on other sites

xoxo Craig
8 minutes ago, BUtterfield 8 said:

God this man is revolting 

 

Piers is good for nothing swine who loves to flap his lips... how he's still on air I will never know

End Racism Now
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bebe
1 hour ago, bionic said:

I just finished watching this (and am ready to try and sleep). It didnt' paint the royal family in a good light but also it didn't make Meghan and Harry look very good either. Harry saying he was 'cut off' gave me the biggest chuckle I've had all year. The DELUSION

Honestly though.

A Prince and Duchess, that left Royal life by choice, doing an interview with Billionaire Oprah Winfrey in the middle of a global pandemic and mentioning that the future King of England cut them off and he had to survive off his mother's fortune gave off big

kim-theres-people-that-are-dying.gif

vibes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

xoxo Craig
6 minutes ago, Miss Dolly said:

She doesn’t. She’s an actress. 

Actors and actresses don't act 24/7, and they can love just like you or I can

End Racism Now
Link to post
Share on other sites

BUtterfield 8

Oprah is live on cbs this morning and she said Queen Elizabeth and prince Philip were not part of the conversations about archie’s skin color 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...