That $500,000 has really flushed out all the stupid people on the Internet

[YourEvilTwin 673]

Everywhere the reward is mentioned you see a bunch of idiots slamming Gaga for not caring about "her dog walker" whose name they can't even bother to find out. It's like they all expect those click-baity headlines to tell the whole story, and it's unfathomable to them that life exists off camera, too.

Goddammit I hate people.

[Stephen 21,890]

They just need to feel morally superior it's an ego thing. Ignore them 

[TylerBR97 14,161]

I’m sure there’s a ton of backlash on Twitter. Delete your Twitter. It was so hard for me but honestly, I experience a LOT less negativity using the internet without Twitter. It’s terrific

[Bonkers 15,614]

I do find it confusing because if she paid 500,000 to dog nappers (if that's how you read "no questions asked)  and just let them get away with it... wouldn't it be extremely dangerous for ALL dog walkers of the rich and famous?

It would basically be just giving 500,000 to the person who shot her dog walker... to me it does sort of seem like she's less interested in helping him and more interested in getting her dogs back.

On the outside, there's no way for me to know what's going on, so I make no judgments, but I do understand why people are questioning concern for the dog walker.  I'm sure he's sick about the dogs being gone and is desperate to have them safely returned too.

Edited February 25 by Bonkers

[StarstruckIllusion 27,893]

I don’t get why people are mad at Gaga for the media’s failure of reporting she cares about her dog walker too. Nobody offers tips for attempted murder. It’s literally what the police are paid for. It’s literally only for missing people.

[The Fame 1,971]

People are dumb. The 500k is a reward for the return of the stolen pets; Ryan was not kidnapped and therefore a ransom is not needed. YES, he has medical bills, but Gaga can just quietly pay those and wouldn't announce it. The reward money needs to be announced.

[mamo 7,935]

3 minutes ago, Bonkers said:

I do find it confusing because if she paid 500,000 to dog nappers and just let them get away with it... wouldn't it be extremely dangerous for ALL dog walkers of the rich and famous?

It would basically be just giving 500,000 to the person who shot her dog walker... to me it does sort of seem like she's less interested in helping him and more interested in getting her dogs back.

On the outside, there's no way for me to know what's going on, so I make no judgments, but I do understand why people are questioning concern for the dog walker.  

I think the whole point of the $500,000 reward is so that if the shooters/kidnappers reach out by phone/e-mail, the police or whoever in charge of the case can track these a**holes down.

Edited February 25 by mamo

[YourEvilTwin 673]

1 minute ago, Bonkers said:

I do find it confusing because if she paid 500,000 to dog nappers (if that's how you read "no questions asked)  and just let them get away with it... wouldn't it be extremely dangerous for ALL dog walkers of the rich and famous?

It would basically be just giving 500,000 to the person who shot her dog walker... to me it does sort of seem like she's less interested in helping him and more interested in getting her dogs back.

On the outside, there's no way for me to know what's going on, so I make no judgments, but I do understand why people are questioning concern for the dog walker.  

What, you think the LAPD are there for eye candy? They’ll be watching the money like hawks, and they’ll be asking all the questions.

[pachinko 5,093]

7 minutes ago, YourEvilTwin said:

Everywhere the reward is mentioned you see a bunch of idiots slamming Gaga for not caring about "her dog walker" whose name they can't even bother to find out. It's like they all expect those click-baity headlines to tell the whole story, and it's unfathomable to them that life exists off camera, too.

Goddammit I hate people.

They should slam the media not Gaga. 

[LG2008 1,754]

Just now, Bonkers said:

I do find it confusing because if she paid 500,000 to dog nappers and just let them get away with it... wouldn't it be extremely dangerous for ALL dog walkers of the rich and famous?

It would basically be just giving 500,000 to the person who shot her dog walker... to me it does sort of seem like she's less interested in helping him and more interested in getting her dogs back.

On the outside, there's no way for me to know what's going on, so I make no judgments, but I do understand why people are questioning concern for the dog walker.  

If they agree to receive the money, it might be easier for the police to track them... First they get the dogs safe and then, they go after the criminals...

Gaga might not be 'asking questions' but the police will... And $500,000 is waaay more than what they could get from selling them...

[Bonkers 15,614]

1 minute ago, YourEvilTwin said:

What, you think the LAPD are there for eye candy? They’ll be watching the money like hawks, and they’ll be asking all the questions.

So you're saying "no questions asked" is a trap.  

That's why I said I have no idea because I'm on the outside.  I'm just saying I see why people see "no questions asked" and then think, gee, what about the guy who got shot.  

[Luke78619 19,019]

Couldn’t the reward money just be a way of trying to work out the kidnappers so they get arrested and therefore the reward isn’t needed, or maybe can go towards a dog charity or something 

[YourEvilTwin 673]

1 minute ago, Bonkers said:

So you're saying "no questions asked" is a trap.  

That's why I said I have no idea because I'm on the outside.  I'm just saying I see why people see "no questions asked" and then think, gee, what about the guy who got shot.  

Yes, and it’s astounding to me that this is not blindingly obvious to everyone else.

[E Z 5,646]

Gaga is gonna have top notch security for her kids after this. 

[Economy 35,368]

11 minutes ago, Stephen said:

They just need to feel morally superior it's an ego thing. Ignore them 

I been using this term a lot. Is it catching on?