Jump to content
politics

Biden refuses to cave to Republicans


FATCAT

Featured Posts

MANiCURE1295
13 minutes ago, Dennnis said:

$1,400+$600 is $2,000.

I can’t stand you guys sometimes 🤔

I Listened to a podcast that argued about the same thing, one host thought they meant 2000$ checks do the fact that they kept mentioning 2000 after the 600 already passed and not 1400, but then the other host thought it was pretty obvious they were intending 600+1400 = 2000

we’re literally arguing about interpretation, let’s be happy if we get 1.9T, can we please not bitch :bear:

Link to post
Share on other sites

shoful
2 hours ago, Jill said:

Yas daddy Biden, lick me like you licked that ice cream

No one wanna lick that wrinkled bean 

"My name is Dita, I'll be your Mistress tonight..."
Link to post
Share on other sites

DenDenTired
13 minutes ago, MANiCURE1295 said:

I Listened to a podcast that argued about the same thing, one host thought they meant 2000$ checks do the fact that they kept mentioning 2000 after the 600 already passed and not 1400, but then the other host thought it was pretty obvious they were intending 600+1400 = 2000

we’re literally arguing about interpretation, let’s be happy if we get 1.9T, can we please not bitch :bear:

They talked $2k the whole time and we only got $600, we’re getting the rest of what was discussed. They never claimed an additional $2k. I agree with you 100% though, be happy that we got anything lol 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DenDenTired

If Arianna Grande said she’s releasing a song called 69 but it’s actually 34+35  is the song still about 69ing? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

StarstruckIllusion

Please keep this energy up for years to come, Joe. The Republicans showed Dems no mercy, so don’t give it back. Especially not after they’ve trashed everything 

Link to post
Share on other sites

StarstruckIllusion
35 minutes ago, Dennnis said:

$1,400+$600 is $2,000.

I can’t stand you guys sometimes 🤔

 

20 minutes ago, MANiCURE1295 said:

I Listened to a podcast that argued about the same thing, one host thought they meant 2000$ checks do the fact that they kept mentioning 2000 after the 600 already passed and not 1400, but then the other host thought it was pretty obvious they were intending 600+1400 = 2000

we’re literally arguing about interpretation, let’s be happy if we get 1.9T, can we please not bitch :bear:

 

5 minutes ago, Dennnis said:

They talked $2k the whole time and we only got $600, we’re getting the rest of what was discussed. They never claimed an additional $2k. I agree with you 100% though, be happy that we got anything lol 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

TheQueenLG
38 minutes ago, Dennnis said:

$1,400+$600 is $2,000.

I can’t stand you guys sometimes 🤔

That $600 was from Donald Trump, you know the bad orange evil Cheeto man.

Biden promised $2000. If he does not give us $2000, he lied and played with peoples' lives. 

It's really that simple. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ALGAYDO
51 minutes ago, Dennnis said:

$1,400+$600 is $2,000.

I can’t stand you guys sometimes 🤔

They ran on a $2000 stimulus, not a “y'all already got $600 from Donald Trump, we’ll give you another $1400 so that equals $2000” but okay :triggered:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chromatican
45 minutes ago, Dennnis said:

If Arianna Grande said she’s releasing a song called 69 but it’s actually 34+35  is the song still about 69ing? 

 

47 minutes ago, Dennnis said:

They talked $2k the whole time and we only got $600, we’re getting the rest of what was discussed. They never claimed an additional $2k. I agree with you 100% though, be happy that we got anything lol 

Let's not play semantic games. They campaigned on $2K checks, which implies a single check worth $2K.

Link to post
Share on other sites

littlepotter

On today's episode of little monsters discover: politicians often use ambiguous language and avoid making obvious statements so that they can go back on their word if need be 

chaeri pls
Link to post
Share on other sites

Gagaloo911

The fools in here buying into the corporate media propaganda meant to cover for Dems failures, caving and politicking :saladga:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh you know the republicans are capable of accusing the democrats of taking credit for a check that was passed by a Republican senate and president... i mean that is technically what is happening here. I’m mad that democrats make it that easy for republicans to sucker punch them. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Agunimon said:

Can someone explain why they can side step the traditional 60-vote threshold?

Budget reconciliations, which are only allowed for budget legislation, allow for bills to be expedited with a “simple majority” (51) There’s a limit to how many times they can do this, though, which is why they should be pushing for more common-sense solutions not bandaids. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...