Teletubby 114,669 Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 About merch There will not as many options as is used to be. Artists are making more money from merch than from sales, streams. If product include album as part of the packages, sales count on the Billboard charts, for example: https://shop.shawnmendesofficial.com/products/wonder-limited-edition-zine-w-cd-limited-collectible-card-pack-vi-inside full article https://www.billboard.com/articles/business/9484117/merch-bundles-chart-rules-ariana-grande-album-releases/ i'm just a baby and @Juanlittlem is my ❀*·ꕤ. ☁️eternal enemy🌩️。˚❀ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LUCARTPOP 5,804 Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 Well maybe if her merch didn't suck Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Adarsh Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 The jockstraps will be discussed till the end of time won’t they? Her impact Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poker 3,302 Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 Queen of jockstraps Kindness rules all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RenegAde 15,980 Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 "Charts or metric do not dictate when her music is released" Sure janika Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy 10,288 Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 6 minutes ago, Adarsh said: The jockstraps will be discussed till the end of time won’t they? Her impact I mean...yeah lol It's easily the most over-the-top and excessive example of what the merch-forward album push looks like. Umbrellas, sweatpants, rain boots, even jockstraps! It basically writes itself as a tantalizing line lol Doesn't hurt that it's also a healthy dose of cringe in its own right lolol I think only Gaga could really do it, though, and that's another thing. It would be just pure cringe if another artist did it, but Gaga's whole schtick is a little over the top, a little cringe, a little camp, etc. So I think it's highly memorable for the item itself, the space it takes up in her marketing mix, as well as for the artist its associated with. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vyniildisk 12,689 Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rasclautmangos 2,739 Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 Did Gaga's jockstraps even sell all THAT well? It was probably a few thousand at most. I suppose any little bit helps, but I doubt Gaga was pushing out a crazy amount of merch bundles. Ariana is supposed to be the main pop girl right now. With the way her fans carry on, she should have outsold regardless. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyaway 15,350 Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 They're playing the "music not the bling card" because it's flopping. The album is just not it. They tried to replicate a formula, and people just didn't like it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kadikaado 4,302 Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 This is quite boring, actually. Releasing bundles with jockstraps, sweatshirts etc. was so much fun. I hope Gaga will continue to sell these products, but now without the bundle. It'd be totally nice if she was able to sell Chromatica merch in mega-stores. Here in Brazil you can find Joanne shirt in a brand called Riachuelo. I just realized that I need a Chromatica speedo. A clothing line inspired by Gaga's albums would be 11/10. It just need to be easy to buy and produced locally because, GURL, the price of buying an official Chromatica shirt in Brazil... THAT'S EXPENSIVE!! I am authistic, so don't be offended if I make a mess sometimes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlepotter 72,579 Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 22 minutes ago, alicefromabove said: They're playing the "music not the bling card" because it's flopping. The album is just not it. They tried to replicate a formula, and people just didn't like it. I'm glad. Maybe Ari will get the hint to start moving into better territory musically. She was doing great with DW and Sweetener but then the young gays started complaining about pharell williams so she took god is a woman and made two albums out of it chaeri pls Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bradley 54,606 Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 The music industry is extremely volatile. Numbers should not be seen as carrying equivalent weight across the period of years. Any subtle changes to the rule will affect the figures we see. I'm not an Ariana fan but at least it's a #1 album. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie 608 Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 I genuinely think Arianna doesn't care about numbers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodandsmile 9,025 Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 She shouldn't even need bundles to sell if she is the biggest popstar of the world as people love to say! Stop with the excuses. It underperformed, move on! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yxilon 5,248 Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 "we were prepared for lower numbers" oh c'mon darling, no you weren't, just admit it the album underperformed in comparison to the actual expectations and predictions. It can happen. Still enough to reach #1 so not a catastrophic flop, trying to find a justification is not necessary. Everything could be everything (it could mean anything) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.