Trudeau Hires Extremely High Profile Woman To Replace Finance Minister

[SLAG 7]

13 minutes ago, Economy said:

 

He's had the beard for months now and it looks terrible. I actually love beards and facial hair but in his case it just doesn't suit him

 

And U should of seen during the height of Covid when he didn't get a haircut in like forever and looked like he was wearing a mop

 

Ugh. I'm so glad I didn't waste my life with him. I'll have to go with Macron 

[Economy 52,842]

1 minute ago, KanyeWest said:

That's a bit sexist, dont know if u realize, dont know what u meant by that

It's not sexiest stop making that assumption

 

I'm saying this based on the interaction I keep seeing. 

 

If he kept reacting the same way with a male politician constantly licking his ass I would have said the exact same

[Guest]

4 minutes ago, Economy said:

It's not sexiest stop making that assumption

 

I'm saying this based on the interaction I keep seeing. 

 

If he kept reacting the same way with a male politician constantly licking his ass I would have said the exact same

Since Trudeau is not gay I assumed it's because a man and a woman interact with each other and u thought oh, he likes her work so he must like her and be attracted to her. But if you think it was not sexist then nothing I can comment on  I will agree with you

[GagaSine 7,464]

3 minutes ago, Economy said:

I'm not gonna argue without going deeper into details. I don't know enough to say she should or shouldn't be

 

I gave you my impression based on the article u gave me and the information I have so far that I'm not seeing as big a connection as your comment made it sound

 

And I never defended it. I literally just said she shouldn't have covered anything up

Tbh I feel like you implicitly trust politicians on a different level than I do. I do not trust them at all and find them all very very suspect.

Her position on climate change alone is enough for me to not trust her at all to make decisions in the best interest of Canadians, and this pushes it over the edge.

There is a growing issue of white nationalism in Canada, so i think it is more than necessary to have increased scrutiny about these kinds of things and hold the people elected to serve us accountable. That is hardly something frivolous like ‘cancel culture’.

https://www.cbc.ca/cbcdocspov/features/white-nationalism-and-right-wing-extremism-arent-new-to-canada

 

https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/7kpxxb/canada-among-very-worst-white-supremacist-countries-report

[Economy 52,842]

Just now, KanyeWest said:

Since Trudeau is not gay I assumed it's because a man and a woman interact with each other and u thought oh, he likes her work so he must like her and be attracted to her. But if you think it was not sexist then nothing I can comment on  I will agree with you

As far as we know he is straight but that only makes the possibility all the more likely. Straight men being influenced by sex on promotional decisions is not exactly a rare thing. Hypothetically if that was indeed the case how would noticing that be sexist? I wouldn't be the one treating her differently for her sex that would be on Trudeau not me. Calling it out makes me sexist?

 

But again it was a generalized comment. Its just very obvious he has a bit of an obsession with her for whatever reason sexual or not. If it was with a man to the same degree it would still raise eyebrows just the same

[Economy 52,842]

2 minutes ago, GagaSine said:

Tbh I feel like you implicitly trust politicians on a different level than I do. I do not trust them at all and find them all very very suspect.

Her position on climate change alone is enough for me to not trust her at all to make decisions in the best interest of Canadians, and this pushes it over the edge.

There is a growing issue of white nationalism in Canada, so i think it is more than necessary to have increased scrutiny about these kinds of things and hold the people elected to serve us accountable. That is hardly something frivolous like ‘cancel culture’.

https://www.cbc.ca/cbcdocspov/features/white-nationalism-and-right-wing-extremism-arent-new-to-canada

 

https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/7kpxxb/canada-among-very-worst-white-supremacist-countries-report

I don't trust politicians on general actually for your information. I think they constantly play political games and aren't fully honest at all times even the best of them

 

But I also think ppl holding them to unhumanly possibly standards also on makes the problem worse.

 

Even Regular mistakes anybody would make when it's a celebrity or politician that does them they are dragged to hell. If I was in their shoes if try to brush things off too or avoid them

 

I'm not saying what she did about hiding her family connections whatever they may have been to the Holocaust was right. But I'm not surprised she did. A lot of people would not be able to look past it and see her for her as an individual instead of her family

 

As for climate change that's a whole other argument and topic that I can't debate. I don't know her policies on this

 

[Guest]

2 minutes ago, Economy said:

Straight men being influenced by sex on promotional decisions is not exactly a rare thing. Hypothetically if that was indeed the case how would noticing that be sexist? I wouldn't be the one treating her differently for her sex that would be on Trudeau not me. Calling it out makes me sexist?

No it just insinuates that she didn't earn it or that a man cannot admire a woman's work without it being a result of sexual attraction. Im not sure straight men give promotions to women bcs they find them attractive, I'd like to know if there's any data or research that u base that opinion from. 

4 minutes ago, Economy said:

But again it was a generalized comment. Its just very obvious he has a bit of an obsession with her for whatever reason sexual or not. If it was with a man to the same degree it would still raise eyebrows just the same

I can understand that but it still doesn't make sense but maybe because you are bi and u think everyone else is bi

[GagaSine 7,464]

39 minutes ago, Economy said:

I don't trust politicians on general actually for your information. I think they constantly play political games and aren't fully honest at all times even the best of them

 

But I also think ppl holding them to unhumanly possibly standards also on makes the problem worse.

 

Even Regular mistakes anybody would make when it's a celebrity or politician that does them they are dragged to hell. If I was in their shoes if try to brush things off too or avoid them

 

I'm not saying what she did about hiding her family connections whatever they may have been to the Holocaust was right. But I'm not surprised she did. A lot of people would not be able to look past it and see her for her as an individual instead of her family

 

As for climate change that's a whole other argument and topic that I can't debate. I don't know her policies on this

 

So politicians are shady, but they shouldn’t be held to high standards? I truly don’t understand. This is not a simple mistake, her choices will effect the future of the country. It is essential we hold her and all politicians to the highest standards. She didn’t just hide her past, she openly praised her grandfather on several occasions.

But I will leave it at that.

[Economy 52,842]

4 minutes ago, KanyeWest said:

No it just insinuates that she didn't earn it or that a man cannot admire a woman's work without it being a result of sexual attraction. Im not sure straight men give promotions to women bcs they find them attractive, I'd like to know if there's any data or research that u base that opinion from. 

I can understand that but it still doesn't make sense but maybe because you are bi and u think everyone else is bi

Him being obsessed with her (or at least that's how it's appeared to me) doesn't mean she isn't qualified or that she didn't earn it. I never said she was some ordinary person and only got promoted cuz Trudeau likes her

 

And it doesn make sense. An obsession doesn't have to be sexual. It could still happen with a man

 

Think when ppl think someone is cool or everything they wanna be like and get get infatuated or obsessed or stockerish... It doesn't have to be sexual and a straight person can have it to the same sex

 

Again, I never said his obsession was sexual. I said he appears to have an obsession. It may or may not be sexual. It could even be that I'm the one imagining it

 

But long story short I was never directly implying what u think I was implying (tho it is one of possibilities I considered but not exclusively) 

[Economy 52,842]

14 minutes ago, GagaSine said:

So politicians are shady, but they shouldn’t be held to high standards? I truly don’t understand. This is not a simple mistake, her choices will effect the future of the county. It is essential we hold her and all politicians to the highest standards. She didn’t just hide her past, she openly praised her grandfather on several occasions.

But I will leave it at that.

Im not saying ur wrong on anything tho don't misunderstand. I can't really argue on something I don't know much about. I know of her work history I don't know of her personal history, or beliefs etc

 

U could be totally right my first response is just the impression I was getting so far based on article u gave me and what u said that's it

 

And as for ur question about standards... I do think they need to be accountable yes but I also equally think some ppl are too unfair on certain things with politicians and celebrities. And I do equally think that does not exactly help the tendency of them trying to hide mistakes, it only encourages it when ppl never accept apologies or blow some stuff out if proportion.

[GagaSine 7,464]

22 minutes ago, Economy said:

Im not saying ur wrong on anything tho don't misunderstand. I can't really argue on something I don't know much about. I know of her work history I don't know of her personal history, or beliefs etc

 

U could be totally right my first response is just the impression I was getting so far based on article u gave me and what u said that's it

 

And as for ur question about standards... I do think they need to be accountable yes but I also equally think some ppl are too unfair on certain things with politicians and celebrities. And I do equally think that does not exactly help the tendency of them trying to hide mistakes, it only encourages it when ppl never accept apologies or blow some stuff out if proportion.

I agree that ppl play manipulative political games to smear ppl they don’t like or  further their own careers but I don’t think that should effect seeking integrity, justice, accountability. But public opinion is certainly a balancing act, but I also believe if someone is truly honest and has moral integrity, most people will be able to see through the bullsh*t and lies (I naively hope lol).

[Economy 52,842]

2 minutes ago, GagaSine said:

I agree that ppl play manipulative political games to smear ppl they don’t like or  further their own careers but I don’t think that should effect seeking integrity, justice, accountability. But public opinion is certainly a balancing act, but I also believe if someone is truly honest and has moral integrity, most people will be able to see through the bullsh*t and lies (I naively hope lol).

I would hope so too

 

 

[Twitter 14]

1 hour ago, blankpaper said:

Someone who’s qualified for their position?

The US could never 

That’s really any job in America.

[Economy 52,842]

1 minute ago, Twitter said:

That’s really any job in America.

Any job is qualified? I don't understand ur response

[blankpaper 21]

1 minute ago, Twitter said:

That’s really any job in America.

Do you mean no one in America is qualified for their jobs? Or just our current government situation lol