Biden says "We should train cops to shoot unarmed people in the leg..."

[Pennywise 36,080]

2 minutes ago, Adakam said:

Says the guy who made a thread with a twisted quote and a clickbait title...

Nothing there was twisted as I was quoting a tweet, and all of that did come out of Biden's mouth. What he MEANT, according to you, is okay, while I think it is, especially during a period like this, utter bullshit.

Stop trying to make it about a title when you are simply mad that he said something that is very hard to spin in a positive light, and that we can see through that. 

Also, as a further suggestion, before you start to compare numbers, look up something called "voter suppression". I shouldn't know your country better than you do. 

 

[Guest]

2 minutes ago, xoxo Craig said:

Yeah but you can't buy a gun or even import it into the country. Its illegal. It'll get stopped at customs. So the liklihood of someone getting a gun is very very low... even if its an illegal gun. We haven't had a 'mass shooting' since 1996, and since then, there has been a real clamp down on guns. Even knives. You have to be of a certain age to buy knives here. 

The US should take notes imo. Get rid of guns entirely and then you wouldn't have shootings evey other week

So if I was in London, and I wanted to find a gun illegally as a criminal, I cant easily do that?

Personally, im against gun control, but that does not mean im denying it "worked" in the UK.

[Pennywise 36,080]

If you have to do mental gymnastics to make a candidate seem good, doesn't it show something about both you and that candidate 

[ImTired 3,956]

59 minutes ago, Buddy said:

I'm sorry, but Donald Trump supporters on GagaDaily aren't a thing. (Goosey ain't here no more sis) 

Many of us are simply fed up with this country's piss poor standards on both sides. While younger generations have shifted left, the senile corporate Democratic establishment have stood complicit and often even contributed to the rightwing shift in this country. This has been been going on since the 80s.

It is frustrating though not surprising that the establishment had the choice to play this from the left this election, but chose instead - yet again - to move themselves, our only option, even further right. 

No, its usually Burnout suppoters with an agenda who will misinterpret and obfuscate literally anything to further their own agenda, same as Trump. Exhibit 1, this effing post. Exhibit 2, literally any Biden, Pete, or non-Bernie candidate post this past year. 

And you can piss off too. Making mass generalizations about entire groups of people, because your echo chamber circle of friends echos hardest TO YOU, and they STILL cant be bothered to vote. 

[Buddy 5,686]

21 minutes ago, Adakam said:

Nice try, im not calling people out because Biden needs your votes, Bernie's primary turnout already proved that progressives are too lazy to vote anyway. Im calling people out because its actually fun to see all the Bernie fans being hypocrites and acting like theyre ok with trump winning no matter the cost, just because their messiah didnt get the award. Trump is destroying EVERYTHING but dNc bAd!!!!1

Hillary Clinton lost by 77,000 votes in 2016. 8,466,161 people voted for Bernie this primary.

2016 was decided by less than half the amount Americans who went out to vote for Tulsi... let that sink in. 

[Ziggy 14,010]

4 hours ago, Fantina said:

People can still die if shot in the leg. What is this nonsense?

Which as ex-military I would hope he’d know...

[xoxo Craig 55,649]

14 minutes ago, Faysalaaa said:

So if I was in London, and I wanted to find a gun illegally as a criminal, I cant easily do that?

Personally, im against gun control, but that does not mean im denying it "worked" in the UK.

It would be very very difficult to find a gun, yes.

[Adakam 2]

22 minutes ago, Pennywise said:

Nothing there was twisted as I was quoting a tweet, and all of that did come out of Biden's mouth. What he MEANT, according to you, is okay, while I think it is, especially during a period like this, utter bullshit.

Stop trying to make it about a title when you are simply mad that he said something that is very hard to spin in a positive light, and that we can see through that. 

Also, as a further suggestion, before you start to compare numbers, look up something called "voter suppression". I shouldn't know your country better than you do. 

 

If you still cant admit the twist in your title, im out because I wont keep talking to someone pretty much illiterate.

Today I learned that "Shoot unarmed people", is the same as "Shoot incoming knife attackers".  Awesome.

 

 

[Buddy 5,686]

33 minutes ago, ImTired said:

No, its usually Burnout suppoters with an agenda who will misinterpret and obfuscate literally anything to further their own agenda, same as Trump. Exhibit 1, this effing post. Exhibit 2, literally any Biden, Pete, or non-Bernie candidate post this past year. 

And you can piss off too. Making mass generalizations about entire groups of people, because your echo chamber circle of friends echos hardest TO YOU, and they STILL cant be bothered to vote. 

 

1) Where is the lie? My post ain't nothing but facts!

2) ...and every candidate turned out to be opportunistic and / or fraudulent to an extent. (No offense to Yang who's a genuinely sweet guy) Even Bernie sold out the progressive movement in the end. He was too weak to stand up for himself and I've always known that about him, but he was literally my only option sooo sucks for me. 

Who did I generalize, the Democratic establishment? Those crooks are more than worthy of my generalization.

Echo chamber of friends? I'll have you know, my like 5 friends told me to stfu about Bernie so many times this election I've lost count. Can't really blame them  

[Pennywise 36,080]

6 minutes ago, Adakam said:

If you still cant admit the twist in your title, im out because I wont keep talking to someone pretty much illiterate.

Today I learned that "Shoot unarmed people", is the same as "Shoot incoming knife attackers".  Awesome.

 

 

Is that what happens when little bidensters can't find a further argument to put him in a good light? They call people "illiterate" and run? 

 

Then again, your whole campaign is based on "ORANGE MAN BAD" SO I shouldn't be surprised at the level of literacy there. 

Have a nice day, . 

[Adakam 2]

Just now, Pennywise said:

Is that what happens when little bidensters can't find a further argument to put him in a good light? They call people "illiterate" and run? 

 

Then again, your whole campaign is based on "ORANGE MAN BAD" SO I shouldn't be surprised at the level of literacy there. 

Have a nice day, . 

"little bidensters" lmao, yeah, im talking to a kid past his bedtime.

Have a nice day too!

[ImTired 3,956]

56 minutes ago, Buddy said:

 

1) Where is the lie? My post ain't nothing but facts!

2) ...and every candidate turned out to be opportunistic and / or fraudulent to an extent. (No offense to Yang who's a genuinely sweet guy) Even Bernie sold out the progressive movement in the end. He was too weak to stand up for himself and I've always known that about him, but he was literally my only option sooo sucks for me. 

Who did I generalize, the Democratic establishment? Those crooks are more than worthy of my generalization.

Echo chamber of friends? I'll have you know, my like 5 friends told me to stfu about Bernie so many times this election I've lost count. Can't really blame them  

You peppered your commentary with so many tired, stale buzz words, it's less fact and more Trumpian nonsense. But you keep being loud and ineffectual. Us "senile corporate democrats" still have your back. Come join us. You know, if you are really interested in governing and not just megaphone-ing rancid platitudes for the feelz. 

[March34th 1,973]

its disgusting how these are the two people americans are expected to choose between.

they have plenty in common though, including how both Biden and Trump are predators. I feel so bad for Americans right now.

[Not The Real Gaga 7,582]

4 hours ago, Florin said:

You dont have to be a genius to understand the point he is trying to make and I think it is standard practice around the world. In some situations, u first have to shot in the air and then aim for a non deadly zone. 

Someone can still be unarmed and dangerous and if police will shot, maybe it is better to do it in the leg. 

 

This. It's indeed common practice to shoot someone in his/her/their leg if the situation is escaleting. Shooting should never be the first option, I think everybody agrees on that. But when lives (of the police offers, bystanders or even the offenders) are in danger, sometimes it's necessary to do (unfortunately).

[A R T P O P 545]

"Don't shoot to kill. Shoot to seriously injure instead"