Jump to content
opinion

Track Lengths Don't Justify Meltdowns


ShayCristoforo

Featured Posts

FlopSlurper
1 hour ago, jorja said:

Yes. People act like they're just a bunch of 5 minute long track that got shortened.. that's just not realistic :laughga: these songs were CONCEIVED this way, they were meant to be short, and that's it. 

I trust Gaga and BloodPop :lana:

free woman demo is 37 seconds longer than the album version, so they did actually cut off parts and the songs weren't created that short

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Suigetsu
1 hour ago, Dilwyn said:

is just a silly thing to be angry about

most songs nowadays are even smaller, she can't keep making 5 minutes songs in 2020.

well, ChartGa can't...

Link to post
Share on other sites

HorusRa2
46 minutes ago, Agunimon said:

You bitches aren't even going to notice when you have it on repeat all day. 2/2 songs released so far have immense repeat value. Clearly that's something she is going for.

1/2 songs. Stupid Love is far and away her worst single in a very long time IMHO. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sinefrombelow

I wasn't here for Joanne but just a reminder that Joanne standard is *three minutes shorter* than Chromatica standard, so it's a touch longer even without the chromaludes lololol. we're getting FED y'all it's fine. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dilwyn
40 minutes ago, Suigetsu said:

well, ChartGa can't...

nobody can

go look at taylors red tracks lenghts and compare it to lover

the songs went from 5m to 3m at most, everybody is changing because the industry is changing

besides a song being long doesn't mean it's good, jewels and drugs has 4 minutes and it's ****

Link to post
Share on other sites

jorja
45 minutes ago, FlopSlurper said:

free woman demo is 37 seconds longer than the album version, so they did actually cut off parts and the songs weren't created that short

well you shouldn't have listened to it in the first place :poot:

besides, it's only 37 seconds and they wouldn't have done it unless it would make the song better. they're the artists and we're the audience. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

liquidsunshine
2 hours ago, M Monstre said:

A shorter song can have more creative elements, dynamics, and lyrics than longer songs. Length means nothing. 

Not to me generally. Length means nothing to you but it means something to me. Taste is subjective.

I specifically said I prefer songs around 4 minutes. Why are you trying to argue and mock my preference? I don't give a **** if you're happy about any song lengths. If you're happy good for you but don't try to come for me and acting all superior.

Link to post
Share on other sites

FlopSlurper
42 minutes ago, jorja said:

well you shouldn't have listened to it in the first place :poot:

besides, it's only 37 seconds and they wouldn't have done it unless it would make the song better. they're the artists and we're the audience. :oops:

I'm not saying whether it's better or worse, I haven't listened to the album version so I can't judge. You were saying that songs were made that short and nothing was cut, so I corrected you with the facts that we know so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...