Maleficent 6 Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Nino said: This is not the same tech in the video unfortunately, but its promising for sure If you're curious beyond defending somebody who's telling other users that you dont like to go to hell, this study was focused on radio waves, not sound waves. it’s on the same wavelength as what the OP was getting at (pun intended). And i’m not defending anyone, i’m merely presenting what a quick google search resulted in. Not everything is a personal attack. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nino 12 Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 1 minute ago, imwoahvicky said: thx i hope the cops don't catch u lol They might try to stop me so that big pharma can sell different cancer treatments instead of this one Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woolfsmck 2,763 Posted May 12, 2020 Author Share Posted May 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Maleficent said: Not everything is a personal attack. OR an attempt to influence anyone.. like a cat in a sil, I observe life, moving and still. My words give a clue,look inside to see whats true Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nino 12 Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Maleficent said: it’s on the same wavelength as what the OP was getting at (pun intended). And i’m not defending anyone, i’m merely presenting what a quick google search resulted in. Not everything is a personal attack. Well you directly quoted users in quotation marks and shamed them while calling for a mature debate when the topic is malarkey and the op is flinging insults at people like were playing call of duty online and its 2011. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maleficent 6 Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 Just now, Nino said: Well you directly quoted users in quotation marks and shamed them while calling for a mature debate when the topic is malarkey and the op is flinging insults at people like were playing call of duty online and its 2011. Who did I shame?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woolfsmck 2,763 Posted May 12, 2020 Author Share Posted May 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Maleficent said: Who did I shame?! Nino just wants to bash and pat themselves on the back...not much worth discussing. like a cat in a sil, I observe life, moving and still. My words give a clue,look inside to see whats true Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pennywise 36,080 Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 Sound? Harmony? Y'all are living in the past, now the thing is to a s c e n d So long ggd, it was nice while it lasted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nino 12 Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 3 minutes ago, Maleficent said: Who did I shame?! 23 minutes ago, Maleficent said: this thread has been trending everytime i open this site and *this* is the content of it...can we all have a mature debate without the use of the words “hell”, the sarcastic “please”, the patronizing tones, and the calls for other members to “read a book” Glad to clear that up, and just so it doesn't get lost in the derailing of this thread by temper tantrums, radio waves and sound waves aren't the same. That video is selling a form of quackery that many cancer patients have embraced over traditional treatment and payed the ultimate price. What we're not going to do is rationalize the platforming of things that are wrong and potentially deadly under the guise of mature debate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
imwoahvicky 4,248 Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 5 minutes ago, Woolfsmck said: Nino just wants to bash and pat themselves on the back...not much worth discussing. LEAVE HIM ALONE !! just bc Nino does not follow right-wing conspiracy theorist propaganda does not mean he is trying to bash this is SO rude and messed up! you are not spreading GaGa's campaign ! ⚜ Roll Deep ⚜ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nino 12 Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 9 minutes ago, Woolfsmck said: Nino just wants to bash and pat themselves on the back...not much worth discussing. Says the person who's bashed me in this thread several times when I haven't said a single mean word to you Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maleficent 6 Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 3 minutes ago, Nino said: Glad to clear that up, and just so it doesn't get lost in the derailing of this thread by temper tantrums, radio waves and sound waves aren't the same. That video is selling a form of quackery that many cancer patients have embraced over traditional treatment and payed the ultimate price. What we're not going to do is rationalize the platforming of things that are wrong and potentially deadly under the guise of mature debate. I’m sorry you took my comments as shaming. We live in a world where each individual has the agency to practice any kind of treatment to any of their ailments they’d like. I’m sure no one on is on GGD looking for potential cancer treatments, and if they were, they have the ability to form their own opinion. We shouldn’t censor information that is publicly a available on other platforms. Your tone is patronizing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pennywise 36,080 Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 Just now, Maleficent said: We shouldn’t censor information that is publicly a available on other platforms Is it really "information" if it is proven not to work, though? I believe in total freedom of speech but there has to be a difference between spreading misinformation and freedom of speech, especially if the said misinformation can hurt others. Then again, if a person is that gulliable, I don't know. I am totally biased against "alternative" medicine so anything I say would be biased as well. So long ggd, it was nice while it lasted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woolfsmck 2,763 Posted May 12, 2020 Author Share Posted May 12, 2020 I think this type of membership is ruining the site.... Too many small minded members attacking other members... i find response beneath common courtesy... I feel sorry for the adults here... like a cat in a sil, I observe life, moving and still. My words give a clue,look inside to see whats true Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maleficent 6 Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 4 minutes ago, Pennywise said: Is it really "information" if it is proven not to work, though? I believe in total freedom of speech but there has to be a difference between spreading misinformation and freedom of speech, especially if the said misinformation can hurt others. Then again, if a person is that gulliable, I don't know. I am totally biased against "alternative" medicine so anything I say would be biased as well. “The Rife machine hasn't been through the usual process of scientific testing. There are studies that looked at low energy waves as a treatment for cancer. They used machines that work in the same way as the Rife machine. Some of these studies were in the laboratory. One study was on a small number of people with advanced cancer. They had a type of liver cancer called hepatocellular carcinoma. Researchers found that the low frequency waves affected cancer cells. It did not affect normal cells.” https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/cancer-in-general/treatment/complementary-alternative-therapies/individual-therapies/rife-machine-and-cancer Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nino 12 Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 3 minutes ago, Maleficent said: I’m sorry you took my comments as shaming. We live in a world where each individual has the agency to practice any kind of treatment to any of their ailments they’d like. I’m sure no one on is on GGD looking for potential cancer treatments, and if they were, they have the ability to form their own opinion. We shouldn’t censor information that is publicly a available on other platforms. Your tone is patronizing. I have no interest in debating this any further, I was just clearing up so that people who quoted you believing that you validated the claims of the youtube video understood that it wasn't talking about the same thing. I don't mean any harm. The antivax movement has spread exclusively through websites like this were people without degrees contradict leading experts by claiming "rational debate" and pretending their opinion is worth the same as research and data. Regardless of how harmless you think this is, it took you a single link to an article about a similar but not the same technology to sway some people. Misinformation is something I firmly believe we as a society need to take much more seriously, not through censorship, but through clearly and thoroughly stating that it's wrong when it pops up. Harmless internet exchanges is where this stuff multiplies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.