What do you prefer theatrical performances or vocal performances?

[Chromatography 10,186]

she will never top 2009 vmas, ever. so everything pales in comparison so i suppose now i prefer her showcasing her vocals

[Bradley 59,163]

She's able to serve both on top-notch levels.

But if you're asking me which one should take a predominance, then it's definitely theatrical performances since her catalogue is so dance-based.

[JillTyrell2004 490]

https://youtu.be/Z2PJ46Uro5k

both plz.

 

 

[NewYorkCity 10,536]

she always delivers both when she does theatrics. There is not a performance in which she dances so much se can’t sing (except maybe for some Judas performances). The rest she does either a combo of acoustic/theatric (Grammys 2010, Bad romance/speechless with fire piano, Bad romance on X factor, you and I VMAs etc) or does little choreo with a lot of theatrics (every TEOG, MTN, Paparazzi VMAs etc) 

so since we can have both together, I prefer it when she adds theatrics. Even tho I LOVE her piano/covers performances, but since we have to chose...

[Schwerk 7,246]

I like her versatility. She herself is so theatrical even a piano performance can be very theatrical just by her delivery. The way she feels the music, almost spasms and her facial expressions give me life.

This below is one of my favourite performances of her because she dances and sings flawlessly at the same time. It's theatrical but not too complex for her to have to worry about any props or technicalities. (although they did turn her mic off for a sec)

Her performance at the Grammy pre show was more stunning visually but for some reason the Children in Need one takes the crown for me. Maybe it's because I like her expressive face.

 

[NewUsername 11,425]

Both!
And she knows how to combine both perfectly, very often in the same performance, and that's one of the main reasons why I love Gaga so much.

[Putang Ina Mo 2,179]

Why do we have to choose between the two if we can have both?