Jump to content
politics

NYT admit Biden is 'inappropriate' with women then delete it


Azor Ahai

Featured Posts

Morphine Prince

NYT screwed up with this article and they got destroyed on social media :rip: 

Also, I can’t imagine defending Biden. Even if you think the allegations aren’t credible, you were not there and you actively defending him says a lot about your character. 

What happened to “believe women” ? Oh, right. That only applies when they’re accusing someone you don’t like. 

The wise thing to do is take these allegations seriously and go ahead with due process. Are all allegations true? Of course not. But people defending Epstein probably thought they were defending someone innocent too.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply
32 minutes ago, justhislife said:

If somebody sexually assaulted  you, I doubt you'd support them becoming one of the most influential people in the world. That's why it doesn't matter. Biden was an influential man at the time this allegedly happened, and there's no doubt in my mind that his team did everything they can to bury this. Just like I'm sure there's people who did everything to find Tara and have her come forward to begin with. It's pretty obvious that Joe touches people in unwanted ways that make them uncomfortable. Those children he kisses are NOT his and they do NOT really know him. 

Pls stop. There is zero evidence that he sexually assaulted her. This isnt a trump situation. No one pay her to shut up. There wasnt any complain at that date, no story that x newspaper story burried. There is nothing.

U cant believe someone over someone else with nothing. If that's the case, lets start separate men and women at work, because no one can defend himself against such sort of accusation.

As I've said, go and google it. You can find as many photos online with Biden and men. Because they dont fit your agenda, they arent put online so that the creeps interpret then in a disgusting way, but they are outhere. 

This is the kind of guy Biden is. 

Now go and pause it in x second and then interpret in a disgusting way. That's why you guys are doing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said:

NYT screwed up with this article and they got destroyed on social media :rip: 

Also, I can’t imagine defending Biden. Even if you think the allegations aren’t credible, you were not there and you actively defending him says a lot about your character. 

What happened to “believe women” ? Oh, right. That only applies when they’re accusing someone you don’t like. 

The wise thing to do is take these allegations seriously and go ahead with due process. Are all allegations true? Of course not. But people defending Epstein probably thought they were defending someone innocent too.  

So if someone at work would accuse you of sexual assault with nothing, you will be ok to lose your job? 

Sorry but that doesnt make any sense. 

I'm not familiar with any accusation in the last year that didnt get due process. People arent blindy accept these kind of accusations. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Franch Toast

We are so f*cked. I can only hope that Biden picks a stellar VP who reins him in, wins, and steps down after one term and his stellar VP gets the nomination after that. 

She/Her/Hers
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yuuri
3 minutes ago, Franch Toast said:

We are so f*cked. I can only hope that Biden picks a stellar VP who reins him in, wins, and steps down after one term and his stellar VP gets the nomination after that. 

It's heavily hinted at he'll pick Harris or Klobuchar, so no

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince
5 minutes ago, Florin said:

So if someone at work would accuse you of sexual assault with nothing, you will be ok to lose your job? 

Sorry but that doesnt make any sense. 

I'm not familiar with any accusation in the last year that didnt get due process. People arent blindy accept these kind of accusations. 

 

Taking an allegation seriously doesn’t mean immediate repercussions for the accused. It means looking into the situation.

Something they won’t do with Biden because the media is on his side completely. 

Trump’s accusers haven’t gotten due process as far as I know. People who support him don’t care. Powerful men get away with a lot in many cases. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

lego
2 hours ago, Florin said:

Your comment is creepy. You dont have grandparents? :madge:

 

He’s not their grandparent, is he? Would you allow your kids to be sniffed and kissed by strange grandpas? :awkney: 

 

FreePalestine
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said:

Taking an allegation seriously doesn’t mean immediate repercussions for the accused. It means looking into the situation.

Something they won’t do with Biden because the media is on his side completely. 

Trump’s accusers haven’t gotten due process as far as I know. People who support him don’t care. Powerful men get away with a lot in many cases. 

But that is what NYT did with this article. NYT took the accusation seriously, looked into it and they tell you all they could find.

Any other investigation with similar results wont even be published, but they did it with Biden because he is who he is. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yuuri
2 minutes ago, lego said:

 

He’s not their grandparent, is he? Would you allow your kids to be sniffed and kissed by strange grandpas? :awkney: 

 

Funnily enough, Biden says "all women should be believed" but then has the media sweep all of his under the rug

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince
5 minutes ago, Florin said:

But that is what NYT did with this article. NYT took the accusation seriously, looked into it and they tell you all they could find.

Any other investigation with similar results wont even be published, but they did it with Biden because he is who he is. 

They did it with horrible reporting. “No pattern” they say and then name a pattern :rip: 

They deleted it because it’s ridiculous and they know it. 

It may not be rape or sexual assault, but repeatedly hugging and kissing women and making them feel uncomfortable is inappropriate. He has a history of doing that. He was reluctant to accept his actions were inappropriate for a long time. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, lego said:

 

He’s not their grandparent, is he? Would you allow your kids to be sniffed and kissed by strange grandpas? :awkney: 

 

So it is ok if it will be their grandparent now? You know that the person who originally made the comment didnt agreed. So decide what is appropriate guys. 

And it was just an example. The people are there to interact with Biden, to make group photos with him. 

The difference between these photos and a Gaga photo with children fans is that the kids are really interested in Gaga. Here they dont care about Biden, but they are there because of their parents to try to make similar photos / interactions. Cant believe you dont realise that. You hate him so much. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said:

They did it with horrible reporting. “No pattern” they say and then name a pattern :rip: 

They deleted it because it’s ridiculous and they know it. 

It may not be rape or sexual assault, but repeatedly hugging and kissing women and making them feel uncomfortable is inappropriate. He has a history of doing that. He was reluctant to accept his actions were inappropriate for a long time. 

That "patern" can be seen in Biden interactions with men also. That's why the patern isnt believable, as a sexual assault claim. 

Biden himself said that he would limit that kind of interactions, but it is not his fault that they didnt said to him that they are so uncomfortable at the time. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Franch Toast
20 minutes ago, Yuuri said:

It's heavily hinted at he'll pick Harris or Klobuchar, so no

I know, I know. I'm just trying to be hopeful...Harris won't help him in the electoral college, and I'm not sure about Klobuchar, but I'm hoping he picks someone more interesting and progressive who will mobilize voters. It won't be Warren, who hasn't even endorsed him – possibly Gretchen Whitmer, which would help him win Michigan, which he needs...Who knows though. I should have low expectations. 

She/Her/Hers
Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince
2 minutes ago, Florin said:

That "patern" can be seen in Biden interactions with men also. That's why the patern isnt believable, as a sexual assault claim. 

Biden himself said that he would limit that kind of interactions, but it is not his fault that they didnt said to him that they are so uncomfortable at the time. 

Men can’t inappropriately touch other men? 

It’s 100% his fault. There are social cues one must observe and learn to discern, especially as a public figure. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...