Bloomberg prepares media onslaught against Sanders

[Bt1 5,213]

7 hours ago, ItsTommyBitch said:

You can try to weasle out technicalities all you want Right now, it is not mathematically possible or probable in the slightest that Biden or Bloomberg passes 1991 delegates and becomes the nominee. 

Also, Bloomberg won't be dropping out because hes not trying to win. Not a conspiracy, just following what his own team is saying about his candidacy. He's here to be Anti-Bernie, which ultimately protects his class interests. Which is why he was "im not gonna attack Dems, i want us to win" but is now going to spend many millions doing it to the national frontrunner, which could hurt them in the general  - It tracks, at the minimum.

Again. That's what I've said in the first comment. "Bernie will win if moderates continue to split the vote". It seems we agreed from the start? 

I also didnt asked you why Bloomberg wont drop out. Like I didnt ask you why Bernie didnt drop out in 2016 after he knew he cant win. I asked u to imagine why DNC didnt make Bernie to drop out like u like to imagine why DNC dont make people to drop out now. That was the "conspiracy" part. It like the third comment when I explain this to you. 

 

 

[Sepsami 21,094]

13 hours ago, Jenina said:

Bloomberg ads be like

 

this is a parody right? you never know for sure with America 

EDIT: nvm God bless it's an obvious parody

[ItsTommyBitch 12,640]

2 minutes ago, Florin said:

Again. That's what I've said in the first comment. "Bernie will win if moderates continue to split the vote". It seems we agreed from the start? 

I also didnt asked you why Bloomberg wont drop out. Like I didnt ask you why Bernie didnt drop out in 2016 after he knew he cant win. I asked u to imagine why DNC didnt make Bernie to drop out like u like to imagine why DNC dont make people to drop out now. That was the "conspiracy" part. It like the third comment when I explain this to you. 

 

 

Your quote:

"That's simply not true. There are 3 moderates who can win at this point, but they wont if they continue to split the vote. 

Last primary, Bernie went all the way until the end, even if he couldn't win anymore. DNC watched him and did nothing. It's the same case here, but now you are making up a conspiracy theory? Why dont u make a conspiracy theory in regards with Bernie intentions in 2016 and why he stayed in the race even if he couldn't win anymore if u like things like that? "

Me: "Actually, none of the moderates have a path to the nomination via delegates anymore at all and here's why *insert numbers*, whether they stay in the race or not. 2nd, The DNC likely did ask Sanders to drop out anyway, but they can't force people out only encourage to prevent a brokered convention. And they were upset he didnt drop out immediately because they thought it would hurt unity, not because it would prevent Clinton from getting the nomination, she already had it because of Superdelegates on the first ballot"

You: "That's what I said, we agree - the moderates can't win if they split the vote"

Me: "I said they can't win regardless of them splitting the vote " 

[Bt1 5,213]

11 minutes ago, ItsTommyBitch said:

Your quote:

"That's simply not true. There are 3 moderates who can win at this point, but they wont if they continue to split the vote. 

Last primary, Bernie went all the way until the end, even if he couldn't win anymore. DNC watched him and did nothing. It's the same case here, but now you are making up a conspiracy theory? Why dont u make a conspiracy theory in regards with Bernie intentions in 2016 and why he stayed in the race even if he couldn't win anymore if u like things like that? "

Me: "Actually, none of the moderates have a path to the nomination via delegates anymore at all and here's why *insert numbers*, whether they stay in the race or not. 2nd, The DNC likely did ask Sanders to drop out anyway, but they can't force people out only encourage to prevent a brokered convention. And they were upset he didnt drop out immediately because they thought it would hurt unity, not because it would prevent Clinton from getting the nomination, she already had it because of Superdelegates on the first ballot"

You: "That's what I said, we agree - the moderates can't win if they split the vote"

Me: "I said they can't win regardless of them splitting the vote " 

Well. U dont understand mathematics if u think that on a Bernie versus one moderate race, the moderate cant win the nomination because Bernie has 40+delegates more now. 

Now u imagine different things. U imagined before that DNC wants a broken convention. Now u understand that they cant force anyone to drop out, like they couldn't with Bernie. anyway, that's better.