Jump to content
The Evolution of Gaga
politics

Who should Bernie pick as his VP?


BARCODE

Featured Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply
ItWasntLaauv
1 hour ago, HorusRa2 said:

I would pick Yang as an option but he’s said that he wants to pick a woman. So I didn’t include him. 

Copy that, well, Andrew’s still number one overall, but a woman candidate, it would be cool to see Katie Porter, she’s a democrat and the U.S. Representative for California’s 45th congressional district, she’s been on Bill Maher a few times if my memory serves me right. She seems really cool and unproblematic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

derpmonster
2 hours ago, HorusRa2 said:

1. Tulsi - brings balance to the ticket and Foreign Policy experience. Will bring conservatives into the fold who don’t like war and got upset with Trump via Iran. She’s a POC. 

Personally, yes, but the Russian conspiracy theories would be OUT OF CONTROL with her especially with how Hillary defamed her. Hillary attacks Bernie enough as is.

Tulsi is decent but makes questionable choices like abstaining to vote on the Trump impeachment.

Check out iTunes data & graphs at CHARTPOP.live
Link to post
Share on other sites

Tulsi Gabbard would be ideal for me but she would not bring in much votes for him. She barely got any votes in general which is sort of sad imo. 

I guess he can go with Nina Turner which wouldn't be bad at all tbh

Link to post
Share on other sites

Woolfsmck
3 hours ago, BARCODE said:

Question is in the title!

I'd love Kamala Harris, Marriane Williamson, Lady Gaga, or Oprah.

Hulk Hogan....the ultimate figure of women's desire....:popcorn:

like a cat in a sil, I observe life, moving and still. My words give a clue,look inside to see whats true
Link to post
Share on other sites

HorusRa2
9 hours ago, derpmonster said:

Personally, yes, but the Russian conspiracy theories would be OUT OF CONTROL with her especially with how Hillary defamed her. Hillary attacks Bernie enough as is.

Tulsi is decent but makes questionable choices like abstaining to vote on the Trump impeachment.

The russian conspiracy is going to hit Bernie anyway. Adding Tulsi isn't going to change that. And like I said, the conservatives who like Tulsi, who don't believe in Russiagate (I don't believe in Russiagate either btw and you shouldn't either) who want a different option other than Trump are more likely to support a Bernie/Tulsi ticket than any other. I mean, if we must, can we revisit Hillary's choice of Kaine? Did anybody know who he was? Did he really ADD anything to the ticket? Did it really matter? No. The choice matters and I think worse case scenario is if some democrats sit out because they don't like Bernie/Tulsi but it means we get people who would have voted for Trump, the demoratic party voting pool increases and the republican pool decreases. What would most likely happen in this scenario is that suburban democrats will show up for down ballot candidates and either vote blue no matter who the presidential ticket or leave it blank (which happened in 2016 as well). 

I actually think the only person who got the vote right on Trump impeachment was Tulsi. Nancy and the party leadership chose to pursue impeachment not on the first impeachable offense he committed but the offenses that they are also complicit in and are the hardest to prove in a legal sense (i.e. intent). Tulsi did censure of Trump prior to her present vote, which is the next step below voting to impeach so to say that she made a questionable choice is to say that she didn't go along with a partisan choice. 

Many people on here, not necessarily you, but many people on here that I've engaged with associate all of Trump's wrongdoing with the ones he was charged with and make the statement that everybody should have voted to impeach and that we should have impeached him. What I am saying is that impeachment is a political process first and a legal process second. The pragmatic way to pursue impeachment would have been through the emoluments clauses and over his abuse of power with regard to the military (Solemani Strike, Syria Strike, War in Yemen, etc). 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any bottom will do. Power Top Daddy Sanders needs a good submissive counterpart. :ally:

 

All seriousness. Amy or Pete. But Amy got that top energy so not sure if they are compatible. :huntyga:

Link to post
Share on other sites

FFXSoul91
4 hours ago, Eggsy said:

Amy or Pete. But Amy got that top energy so not sure if they are compatible. :huntyga:

I can’t see either of them wanting to be Bernie’s VP. Especially not Pete after all of his calculated attacks and trying to show himself as the “Sanders alternative.”

I’d love to be wrong for the fact that he would help bring a lot of centrists in for the sake of beating Trump. However, I think progressives would worry about what would happen to the “revolution” under a potential Buttigieg presidency and centrists would see him as a sell-out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
17 hours ago, Morphine Prince said:

AOC, but unfortunately she's not old enough. 

If she was I'm sure that's who he'd ask

 

Is it 34 or 35 she has to be?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...