Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
politics

Mike Bloomberg to double ad spending following Iowa Caucus disaster


IamChromatica

Featured Posts

IamChromatica

”Mr. Bloomberg, the former New York City mayor whose campaign is fueled by a multibillion-dollar personal fortune, conferred with advisers on Tuesday morning about the muddled results in Iowa. Encouraged by the murky outcome, Mr. Bloomberg authorized his campaign team to double his spending on television commercials in every market where he is currently advertising and expand his campaign’s field staff to more than two thousand people, strategists involved in the conversations said.“
 

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/04/us/politics/michael-bloomberg-campaign-ads.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good for him. But if after Super Tuesday, the moderates dont remain with only one candidate, Bernie will win no matter how much money he puts into ads.

Link to post
Share on other sites

JusKeepBreathin

I'm pretty sure everyone will increase spending after that mess.

"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King Jr.
Link to post
Share on other sites

ItsTommyBitch

A nightmare :rip:

Everyone left running needs to stand up and say that it is wrong for Bloomberg to be on the debates and for him to buy his way into this election.

私自身もこの世の中も誰もかれもが, どんなに華やかな人生でも, どんなに悲惨な人生でも, いつかは変貌し, 破壊され、消滅してしまう. すべてがもともとこの世に存在しない一瞬の幻想なのだから
Link to post
Share on other sites

Kind of a waste but that’s where all campaign donations go right so.. at least it’s not supporters money lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lion Heart

>expand his campaign’s field staff to more than two thousand people

 

Omg I have a chance now. :excited2: Submitting my application.

▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀
Link to post
Share on other sites

ItsTommyBitch
2 minutes ago, OG Gaga Stan said:

Just a reminder. :rip:

But!!! Conspiracy!?!?!

:saladga: Gaslighting is so effective. I thought Dems were too stupid to beat Trump at his own rhetorical campaign strategy, but here we are with them using pages from the same playbook :deadbanana: 

私自身もこの世の中も誰もかれもが, どんなに華やかな人生でも, どんなに悲惨な人生でも, いつかは変貌し, 破壊され、消滅してしまう. すべてがもともとこの世に存在しない一瞬の幻想なのだから
Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like Bloombergs ad's are having a negative effect. I see his ads so many times that it's exhausting, his name is overexposed and I went from having no opinion of him to an extremely negative one due to how the ads are shoving him down our throats. I actually haven't heard his voice once either, I have no idea who he is or what he sounds like. Just soundbites of other people saying how he will "get things done." This is a terrible strategy and I have a feeling it will be studied in modern marketing classes. I can't imaging what it will be like with double the ad spending, jesus christ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ItsTommyBitch
11 minutes ago, ItsTommyBitch said:

A nightmare :rip:

Everyone left running needs to stand up and say that it is wrong for Bloomberg to be on the debates and for him to buy his way into this election.

To add to this - 

If you liked Cory Booker, or Castro, or Yang, or any other candidate who didnt qualify for a debate or didn't receive a good amount of coverage based on their donors/funding, we need to send the message to the DNC that refusing to change the rules for some candidates, but doing so when offered money for others is WRONG.

 

私自身もこの世の中も誰もかれもが, どんなに華やかな人生でも, どんなに悲惨な人生でも, いつかは変貌し, 破壊され、消滅してしまう. すべてがもともとこの世に存在しない一瞬の幻想なのだから
Link to post
Share on other sites

DiscoHeaven23
19 minutes ago, OG Gaga Stan said:

Just a reminder. :rip:

 

 

I'm confused by this though. Bloomberg isn't as left as Bernie. He's more where Biden and Klobuchar are. So wouldn't he be taking votes from them?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ItsTommyBitch said:

To add to this - 

If you liked Cory Booker, or Castro, or Yang, or any other candidate who didnt qualify for a debate or didn't receive a good amount of coverage based on their donors/funding, we need to send the message to the DNC that refusing to change the rules for some candidates, but doing so when offered money for others is WRONG.

 

Until money dont get completely  out of politics, DNC shouldn't change the rules, especially during an election circle. Let's not make rules that the Republicans dont need to respect.

Also, I dont get this "buying votes" narrative. There are other people in this race who promised free money monthly if they win. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...