Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
politics

Trump threatens to strike Iranian cultural sites


Morphine Prince

Featured Posts

That's so sad. I visited many places in Iran. They have the most beautiful mosques and bazars in the world. Iranians are peaceful. Out of all the people I met, only one spouted government propaganda. The rest still had a trauma from the Iraq war early in the 80s (or was it early 90s?), where many lost at least one relative. I've even heard people who want a peaceful relation with Israel. And no, not just in northern Tehran, but across the country in both suburbs and cities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply
hankhatesyouall

Iran sabotages 6 oil tankers in Strait of Hormuz 

Trump downplays it

Iran shoots down US drone 

Trump downplays it 

Attacks Saudi Oil field

Trump does nothing 

Iran attacks US embassy 

Trump finally responds 

GGD: WHY DOES HE WANT A WAR?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

NCgaga
1 hour ago, Helxig said:

How did America f.uck up so badly?

You all f.ucked up so badly by electing him that is' screwing everyone over.

People die when you elect a piece of ****ing **** like him.

Quit saying you all. Most of the people on this site that voted tried our best to not get him elected, and Hillary won the popular vote. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

monster4life231

I haven't commented on GGD for a while, but felt the need after this. I'm a British person who was young during the Iraq War, so I can't remember it. I'm still learning about foreign policy and politics, so I don't know all the facts of the tensions between the USA and the Middle East, although this is what I think at the moment.  Looking at wars in the Middle East, I find it ridiculous that countries like the USA and the UK, amongst others, believe that dropping bombs on other countries will somehow solve the complex issues which we face. I do not support Soleimani, but  I don't think that killing him will somehow create stability, or improve relations with the USA. It was a dangerous attack which has increased international tensions, for what? Trump can argue that it was to protect Iran from Soleimani, but now Trump is threatening to target 52 cultural sites in Iran, which will effect the citizens of Iran and more thank likely kill innocent people. Threatening war crimes on twitter is the last thing they should be doing. Both sides should seek de-escalation. I also think that if the USA goes to war with Iran, the UK should not join. The wars we have fought in the Middle East have caused more destruction, chaos and more terrorism. Trump provoking Iran will cause more violence. I'm beginning to believe that this action and the threat of war crimes is to distract the USA from impeachment and the upcoming election. This speech by Tony Benn (a former UK MP) explains how I view this escalation situation.

 

spread peace - #MJInnocent
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, hankhatesyouall said:

Iran sabotages 6 oil tankers in Strait of Hormuz 

Trump downplays it

Iran shots down US drone 

Trump downplays it 

Attacks Saudi Oil field

Trump does nothing 

Iran attacks US embassy 

Trump finally responds 

GGD: WHY DOES HE WANT A WAR?!

Don't you see that this is how a war starts?

 

The nature of war is escalatory. One side does something, the other side has to retaliate by doing something just a little bit worse, and so on, till you're in a full-scale, absolute war. You can only break this with negotiation, diplomacy, and making your countries interconnected. What Iran is doing in the region is the same as what the US has done in South-East Asia in the 60s and 70s, Latin America in the 70s and 80s, and the Middle East since the 90s. It's imperialism. If the US isn't going to stop doing that, why expect Iran to stop? 

So what should the US have done? Yes, retaliate. Maybe a cyber attack, for example. Something harmless that still hurts. Not something as escalatory as this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Henri Bardot

Even in WW2 cultural sites were respected (big ben, kölner dom, eiffel tower, bradenburger tor...) for strategic reasons or not, but you get it.

1 hour ago, Lilmonzter said:

Thanks someone had to say it!

Not one republican has raised their voice against it.

How pathetic! :fthis:

I mean, Clinton did something similar I think :shrug: 

pooiota
Link to post
Share on other sites

Zilla

Geneva convention violation..... War crimes. 

I know it won't do anything but I did report him to twitter as a credible threat. 

𝙸'𝚖 𝚊 𝚓𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚓𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚍 𝚘𝚏 𝚐𝚒𝚛𝚕.
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ItsTommyBitch said:

Well, people that don't mind brown people in other countries dying if it serves their interests, mostly :green:

But really, support for a President *tends* to go up during War, because it dominates every headline and there's this attitude of "while we're at war, we absolutely must be focused on the war and the war alone, so we can't criticize the president unless we want to make the president unfocused, and that would be bad for the country and anti-patriotic!"

Which is what Trump wants surely. Assassinating Soleimani was the radical option to retaliate against Iran for their attack 2 weeks ago, but he's a total idiot, and also wants to avoid talks of impeachment still, because as much as he is pretending to be okay with it, his ego is wounded, and as more evidence comes out that makes it necessary to request witnesses at the trial,  he has an interest in anything to help avoid this. I honestly don't think he even cares about Iran at all.

Donald trump only cares about donald trump 

Link to post
Share on other sites

S0436

Iran have threatened to strike the White House?  Isn’t that a cultural site?  Both sides have made threats on numerous sites in the two countries.  Was anyone expecting that striking a US embassy would lead to no retaliation from the US?  I don’t believe Obama wouldn’t have retaliated, figures showed in 2016 alone that 26,171 bombs were dropped under his presidency.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lilmonzter
1 hour ago, Henri Bardot said:

Even in WW2 cultural sites were respected (big ben, kölner dom, eiffel tower, bradenburger tor...) for strategic reasons or not, but you get it.

I mean, Clinton did something similar I think :shrug: 

Yep he bombed iraq during his impeachment episode 

Sing C'est la vie 
Link to post
Share on other sites

PartySick
2 hours ago, StarstruckIllusion said:

Like... he’s never had a focused day in office lmao.

It's crazy how accurate this is.

He ordered the initial strike while he was golfing. And he tweeted these things while at his golf resort.

It's lowkey impressive how he manages to both be the laziest president while also being the most dangerously problematic.

Whimsical bitch
Link to post
Share on other sites

Lilmonzter
30 minutes ago, PartySick said:

It's crazy how accurate this is.

He ordered the initial strike while he was golfing. And he tweeted these things while at his golf resort.

It's lowkey impressive how he manages to both be the laziest president while also being the most dangerously problematic.

115 million of taxpayers money spent golfing 

Sing C'est la vie 
Link to post
Share on other sites

Melech
5 hours ago, Chickens in Malibu said:

:bradley:

While I think the strike against the general may have been warranted if he was plotting an attack against U.S embassy in Iraq, I think this idea of targeting cultural sites is really beneath the U.S.

Even when ****ing Hitler invaded France, he actually had the "courtesy" to not touch or hurt any cultural sites including the Tour Eiffel. Can you really be worse and more inhumane than Hitler? Apparently you can.

Whoever advised him to tweet this is very dumb. This will turn countries against the U.S.

DELETE!

 

Imagine belittling Hitler 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...