Jump to content
celeb

Taylor Swift held hostage by Scott and Scooter


Pop Music

Featured Posts

Itsbrenda
1 hour ago, Anveeroy said:

Sorry I have to say this - The people who do not have any creativity they are supporting Scooter. Because they don't know how to create something! 

Just remember that Taylor isn’t in the business of creativity. She is in the business of making millions weekly. She doesn’t release new albums and charge children’s £100s To see her live because she is creative. She owns a business and releases only for money. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 208
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Never been a huge Swift supporter but this is disgusting and not morally right. Yes they made a business deal and it's legal, but it's not morally right. I don't know how these two sleep at night. I guess in a bed of money... I personally couldn't do that to an artist 

Link to post
Share on other sites

FlopSlurper
7 hours ago, LadyHaha said:

It’s not, but ok. 
 

what is entirely wrong is doxxing

IT IS entirely wrong, her old label released her contract back in summer when all the mess happened and it says for each album she records they'll give her her masters for an old album. No where does it mention about them offering her to buy them, which is literally what tay said. Not even they claimed that they offered her to buy them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

FlopSlurper
1 hour ago, LadyHaha said:

Just remember that Taylor isn’t in the business of creativity. She is in the business of making millions weekly. She doesn’t release new albums and charge children’s £100s To see her live because she is creative. She owns a business and releases only for money. 

This is her job, even Gaga sells her music, sells makeup and expensive tickets in vegas to make money 💀. You guys need to come up with better stuff to drag her because it shows that you hate her for nothing.

Speaking of creativity, tell me just 1 pop girl that wrote a whole album ALL by themselves when they were between the age of 17-19 and they went to break records with that album and get nominated for grammys, i'll wait.

Link to post
Share on other sites

gagaschickens

po's scooter?

リのひ ᄃム刀'イ 尺乇ムり イんノ丂, ᄃム刀 リのひ?
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, FlopSlurper said:

This is her job, even Gaga sells her music, sells makeup and expensive tickets in vegas to make money 💀. You guys need to come up with better stuff to drag her because it shows that you hate her for nothing.

Speaking of creativity, tell me just 1 pop girl that wrote a whole album ALL by themselves when they were between the age of 17-19 and they went to break records with that album and get nominated for grammys, i'll wait.

and actually win TWO actual Grammys for it

giphy.gif

 

you should have been here during the 1989 era, those were the times lol

who will love me when the night is over
Link to post
Share on other sites

Infinity Wave
3 hours ago, LadyHaha said:

Just remember that Taylor isn’t in the business of creativity. She is in the business of making millions weekly. She doesn’t release new albums and charge children’s £100s To see her live because she is creative. She owns a business and releases only for money. 

This.

She's a multimillionair artist who lives a perfect life amd has everything and anything she wants.

She keeps complaining about this because she wanna be talked about and want people to support her when she actually doesn't need any support... law is law. Her songs've been rightly bought by two people who now clearly won't let her use them because they own them.

It's not something against artists or againts women of any sort, it's something about money and as EVERY business is. But she wanna cry about it instead of starting a lawsuit because she knows she would loose, everything that's been done was and is legal. 

Just move on with your life. Your fan can still listen to your music and watch your videos, you just cannot make any more money from them. Don't act like she's starting all this for the sake of something else, it's always just about the money....

Colourful
Link to post
Share on other sites

Teal Ambition

GEM EM HALSEY (she deleted the tweets)

Screen-Shot-2019-11-15-at-10-48-32-AM.pn

▌│█║▌║▌║ before I am Canadian, I am Chromatican ║▌║▌║█│▌
Link to post
Share on other sites

CannaeDrive

Doxxing is ain't it. Private business matters between rich people should not concern anyone but those directly involved.

"Fame Is A Boomerang" - Maria Callas
Link to post
Share on other sites

JohnnyVersace

I just want to say that I do support Taylor and her artistry before the following:

...but this isn't entirely uncommon. And as Halsey said, is kind of the unfortunate downside of record deals. You gotta sell out a bit, it's a business transaction. And that's honestly how I see Scooter's mindset in this - as a money making opportunity, not a personal vendetta. 

My question to you guys is - don't you think Gaga has dealt with situations like this? Like I'm sure her performances, song choices, staging, costumes, etc. have had to be approved by some corporate white man in the past. I think now under Bobby's management she's much more artistically free, but I wouldn't doubt it's happened. Scott/Scooter's involvement in Taylor's performance or Netflix special doesn't surprise me in the slightest.

I might not agree, but it's something I can see happening frequently in the industry. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Antichrist
3 hours ago, JohnnyVersace said:

I just want to say that I do support Taylor and her artistry before the following:

...but this isn't entirely uncommon. And as Halsey said, is kind of the unfortunate downside of record deals. You gotta sell out a bit, it's a business transaction. And that's honestly how I see Scooter's mindset in this - as a money making opportunity, not a personal vendetta. 

My question to you guys is - don't you think Gaga has dealt with situations like this? Like I'm sure her performances, song choices, staging, costumes, etc. have had to be approved by some corporate white man in the past. I think now under Bobby's management she's much more artistically free, but I wouldn't doubt it's happened. Scott/Scooter's involvement in Taylor's performance or Netflix special doesn't surprise me in the slightest.

I might not agree, but it's something I can see happening frequently in the industry. 

a corporate white man!

220px-Troy_Carter_in_2014_(cropped).png

Link to post
Share on other sites

JohnnyVersace
30 minutes ago, Antichrist said:

a corporate white man!

220px-Troy_Carter_in_2014_(cropped).png

I mean, Troy was just her manager. There were plenty of other guys dictating her career I’m sure. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...