Lion Heart 15,041 Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 A federal judge is leaning towards granting the Michael Jackson estate’s move to take HBO to arbitration in its dispute over the documentary “Leaving Neverland.” Judge George Wu issued a tentative ruling on Thursday in which he denied HBO’s motion to dismiss the estate’s case. Wu is expected to make the ruling final by the end of September. The four-hour documentary features allegations of two men, James Safechuck and Wade Robson, who say they were sexually abused by Jackson over the course of several years when they were young children. The Jackson estate argues that by running the documentary, HBO violated a non-disparagement agreement from a 1992 concert film from Jackson’s “Dangerous” tour. .. Bryan J. Freedman, an attorney for the estate, issued a statement slamming HBO for its “wrongful conduct.” “HBO has tried everything possible to avoid having a trier of fact adjudicate their wrongdoing,” Freedman said. “If HBO believes its actions were proper then there is no reason for them to try and hide behind procedural technicalities to avoid an arbitration or a trial. Whether in an arbitration, federal court, state court or the court of appeal, the Estate of Michael Jackson will force HBO to be held accountable for its wrongful conduct. The Estate will never stop until justice has been obtained.” https://variety.com/2019/biz/news/judge-michael-jackson-estate-leaving-neverland-1203342191/ ▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlingNotTheMusic 25,978 Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 He slept in beds with children though. That's a fact. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regina George 59,387 Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 8 minutes ago, AHippieIsBorn said: He slept in beds with children though. That's a fact. I slept in the same bed as my little cousins so am I a pedophile? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
misunderstood 8,736 Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 "I'd rather be poor and happy, than rich and alone" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeavyyMetalVenuss 1,765 Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 predator or not, michael still slept with children and fetishized them. the evidence that i find complete red flags are of how the boys were able to draw exactly how michael’s vitiligo looked on his genitals, not to mention how they found the kids’ fingerprints on michael’s books of S&M pictures. he had a full security system set up for his bedroom so that he could tell when people were coming that could possibly be due to paranoia of his own safety, but it just makes everything else look even guiltier! he groomed them with presents and gifts, even if his intentions were “pure.” michael jackson was sick in the head, be it pedophilia/childhood trauma, or both. we honestly might never have 100% proof, but i’ll just stick with the fact that he had mental problems. feel free to correct anything i brought up, i don’t mind discussing this! Cake like Malibu Gaga Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 96,468 Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 as they should. MJ is innocent. (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ be delulu until it becomes trululu (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlingNotTheMusic 25,978 Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 13 minutes ago, ReginaGeorge said: I slept in the same bed as my little cousins so am I a pedophile? He wasn't related to them. I'm a victim of child sexual abuse so I don't take this lightly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 134,433 Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, HeavyyMetalVenuss said: the evidence that i find complete red flags are of how the boys were able to draw exactly how michael’s vitiligo looked on his genitals, The first criminal case got thrown out because the "victim" not only couldn't describe Michael's genitals to the court, Jordie didn't even know if MJ was circumcised. Jordie admitted later (not sure if it was before his death or not) that the accusations were false. Idk if they asked the Arvizo boys but they couldn't even provide a consistent timeline of abuse that supposedly happened weeks before. That case was also thrown out because of lack of evidence. Being able to describe Michael nude accurately would have been seriously damning evidence and those were the only two cases while he was alive. ...so idk who lied to you 🖤 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 134,433 Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 Just now, AHippieIsBorn said: He wasn't related to them. I'm a victim of child sexual abuse so I don't take this lightly. Same and neither do I. Which is why these serious accusations being thrown onto an obviously innocent person pisses me off so much. Especially the latest ones from LN which are clearly false. 🖤 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regina George 59,387 Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 1 minute ago, AHippieIsBorn said: He wasn't related to them. I'm a victim of child sexual abuse so I don't take this lightly. Sorry for what you’ve been through but sleeping in the same bed as someone (related or not) means nothing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 134,433 Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 Anyway, OT: GOOD! If they're so sure of Michael's guilt and the guys' honesty then why are they scared to have this mockumentary come under legal scrutiny? 🖤 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biggest Fan 988 Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 26 minutes ago, AHippieIsBorn said: He slept in beds with children though. That's a fact. And? He is not guilty 9 minutes ago, HeavyyMetalVenuss said: predator or not, michael still slept with children and fetishized them. the evidence that i find complete red flags are of how the boys were able to draw exactly how michael’s vitiligo looked on his genitals, not to mention how they found the kids’ fingerprints on michael’s books of S&M pictures. he had a full security system set up for his bedroom so that he could tell when people were coming that could possibly be due to paranoia of his own safety, but it just makes everything else look even guiltier! he groomed them with presents and gifts, even if his intentions were “pure.” michael jackson was sick in the head, be it pedophilia/childhood trauma, or both. we honestly might never have 100% proof, but i’ll just stick with the fact that he had mental problems. feel free to correct anything i brought up, i don’t mind discussing this! That’s a lie claims ‘bout how kids knew how his genitals looked are completely false! Police took pictures and all in all he was found not guilty. LIES‼️ 🤖 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeavyyMetalVenuss 1,765 Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 8 minutes ago, PartySick said: The first criminal case got thrown out because the "victim" not only couldn't describe Michael's genitals to the court, Jordie didn't even know if MJ was circumcised. Jordie admitted later (not sure if it was before his death or not) that the accusations were false. Idk if they asked the Arvizo boys but they couldn't even provide a consistent timeline of abuse that supposedly happened weeks before. That case was also thrown out because of lack of evidence. Being able to describe Michael nude accurately would have been seriously damning evidence and those were the only two cases while he was alive. ...so idk who lied to you thank you for letting me know about this, i’ve only been trying to follow the story online! if they weren’t able to describe if he was circumcised or not, it’s clear they lied about that. that’s a disgusting thing to lie about, though Cake like Malibu Gaga Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 134,433 Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 Just now, HeavyyMetalVenuss said: thank you for letting me know about this, i’ve only been trying to follow the story online! if they weren’t able to describe if he was circumcised or not, it’s clear they lied about that. that’s a disgusting thing to lie about, though To be fair to the kids, it was Jordie's dad making the accusation in the 93 case and the Arvizo boys were obviously being manipulated by their mother in the 2005 case. Still, yeah. It's people like them that killed Michael he couldn't even go back to Neverland after the 2005 case. It was supposed to be his safe haven and a place where he could invite thousands of families to just live free for a day but it became so twisted with dishonesty and people using and abusing him. Such a great man done so goddamn wrong by others. For what? Money. Fame. 🖤 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sickness 1,978 Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 What is a 35 year old man doing sleeping with children with no parents lmao pleaseeee Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.