ZiggyZiggs 30,062 Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 30 minutes ago, corvus albus said: 1. it's impossible to actually force this upon people 2. Laws don't always make sense, just putting it out there 3. censoring speech like that is scummy as hell Ummmm I- nothing u just said makes any sense Censoring speech? Forcing it upon people? Wha? its for merch and product use, and so that no company can profit off of her products when she releases them, do u even know wtf trademarking means Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZiggyZiggs 30,062 Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 24 minutes ago, FentyGa said: it's just for the sake of profit...like, if h&m was to make a tshirt with the phrase, she could sue them because they're profiting off her. obv you can say it lol that's not the point of trademarking beyoncé tried to do the same with "surfboard" but i believe it didnt go through (which makes sense bc it's just one word) Ignore her she drinks, I can’t even believe what they wrote they think trademarking means no one but Lizzo is allowed to say it what in the dictatorship monsters know wtf you’re talking about before saying **** challenge Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
corvus albus 38,031 Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, ZiggyZiggs said: Ummmm I- nothing u just said makes any sense Censoring speech? Forcing it upon people? Wha? its for merchants and product use, and so that no company can profit off of her products when she releases them, do u even know wtf trademarking means It's the same thing Taylor Swift does and it just get's ridiculous. Most of these phrases existed before and just making something popular does not equal the right of possessing said thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZiggyZiggs 30,062 Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 1 minute ago, corvus albus said: It's the same thing Taylor Swift does and it just get's ridiculous. Most of these phrases existed before and just making something popular does not equal the right of possessing said thing. Omfgg sweetie this just means that if a company is selling products with the line basically making money off of her she can sue them that’s it, lmfaoooo this ain’t some tyranny **** Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
corvus albus 38,031 Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 1 minute ago, ZiggyZiggs said: Ignore her she drinks, I can’t even believe what they wrote they think trademarking means no one but Lizzo is allowed to say it what in the dictatorship monsters know wtf you’re talking about before saying **** challenge You didn't even understand me correctly 1. it's impossible to actually force this upon people this phrase was about how impossible it is to actually enforce it. Freaking Amazon sells fake chinese products and nobody can do something against it, so why should the stop before Lizzo just because she trademarked that phrase? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryansamonster 1,755 Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 People are offended over literally everything these days Make that coin girl, haters stay pressed! Until you see the merch and buy it for yourself Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craven Moorecox 2,806 Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 12 minutes ago, ZiggyZiggs said: Ignore her she drinks, I can’t even believe what they wrote they think trademarking means no one but Lizzo is allowed to say it what in the dictatorship monsters know wtf you’re talking about before saying **** challenge Sis snapped! Eye- Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZiggyZiggs 30,062 Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 15 minutes ago, corvus albus said: You didn't even understand me correctly 1. it's impossible to actually force this upon people this phrase was about how impossible it is to actually enforce it. Freaking Amazon sells fake chinese products and nobody can do something against it, so why should the stop before Lizzo just because she trademarked that phrase? Huh? Sweetie did u even read anything that I wrote? Big companies are already making money off of the phrase selling products etc. once and if the trademark is accepted if the companies still keep doing it, she can SUE them, listen closely, key word: SUE, get it now? capiche? here we go again with th ‘impossible to force this upon people’ bs wtf does that even mean? we can still say it oh my god, this just means u and I can’t sell t-shirts with the name on it on a mass scale cuz she can SUE us and rightfully so i- Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZiggyZiggs 30,062 Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 6 minutes ago, Craven Moorecox said: Sis snapped! Eye- Thanks sis but something tells me they understood 0% of what I said cuz they’re still going on about the same thing 😩 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LOVEDRUG 10,745 Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 The full phrase? Fair enough But she cannot trademark 'that bitch' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giorno Giovanna 3,178 Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 1 hour ago, FentyGa said: i mean to be fair it's just for the sake of merchandise and truth hurts has become huge, so the phrase will always be attatched to her. i already see forever 21 (👀) tryna profit off her with it wtf, truth hurts is a common saying I've been knew since being a child, I like Lizzo but she doesn't own that phrase このジョルノジョヴァンナ夢がある Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gypsy Life 118,907 Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 It's just another fad of a meme that'll be forgotten in a couple of months. Singers need to stop trying to trademark their lame lyrics. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FentyGa 14,340 Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 22 minutes ago, ToughHooker said: wtf, truth hurts is a common saying I've been knew since being a child, I like Lizzo but she doesn't own that phrase that's not the lyric she's trademarking lol 18 minutes ago, Gypsy Life said: It's just another fad of a meme that'll be forgotten in a couple of months. Singers need to stop trying to trademark their lame lyrics. imagine actually thinking this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
corvus albus 38,031 Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 1 hour ago, ZiggyZiggs said: Huh? Sweetie did u even read anything that I wrote? Big companies are already making money off of the phrase selling products etc. once and if the trademark is accepted if the companies still keep doing it, she can SUE them, listen closely, key word: SUE, get it now? capiche? Do you even read? I gave you an example why this doesn't work and you said it will work This trademarking won't do anything because against conglomerates like Amazon she's still powerless and we know that people that want to sell this are going to Amazon. Now let me repeat: SUING DOESN'T WORK AGAINST MEGACORPORATIONS UNLESS YOU ARE THE EU! capiche? 1 hour ago, ZiggyZiggs said: here we go again with th ‘impossible to force this upon people’ bs wtf does that even mean? we can still say it oh my god, this just means u and I can’t sell t-shirts with the name on it on a mass scale cuz she can SUE us and rightfully so I still think that trademarking these phrases is wrong Popularizing doesn't mean inventing something. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordEnigma 11,313 Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 2 hours ago, corvus albus said: This is extremely stupid. Words don't belong to anyone. She may be that bitch but the phrase should not belong to her. So you think others should be able to copy lyrics without recognition since they are just words/phrases? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.