shame 25,360 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 Now Gaga needs to come for Party City for selling all those cheap knockoff Gaga wigs! That'll be enough pocket money to fund LG6 promo! angels forever, forever angels Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy scheisse 20,379 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 The lookalike is a WOC Appropriate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloody g 31,731 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 Imagine if Gaga sued everyone that looked like her in 2010/11 『𝐟𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐝』 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JazzGa 14,349 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 I don't like the precedent this sets. If she wins this court case, expect the Kardashians and designer houses to start suing every fast fashion brand and Instagram knockoff boutique shop. I hope none of yall like to wear cheap trendy knockoffs cuz we won't have those anymore. I don't know much about the legal history of fashion copyright infringements and knockoffs, but I'm sure that someone has tried to sue a knockoff company before and lost and that's why we still have so many knockoff makers... God created Adam and Eve, but Gọdga collabed with Brian🎺 and Steve🎷 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RahrahWitch 6,913 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 Good I'm so tired of seeing Merch of other peoples imagery being sold without consent. I see it all the time with Copyrighted IPs and clothing. You want to profit of a person or Franchise, Then sweetie pay for a License to use it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 96,770 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 6 minutes ago, RahrahWitch said: Good I'm so tired of seeing Merch of other peoples imagery being sold without consent. I see it all the time with Copyrighted IPs and clothing. You want to profit of a person or Franchise, Then sweetie pay for a License to use it. But then it will doubled the price since license are expensive and most people will not afford that, say, people who shops at Primark because it is economical for their situation and still wanna look cool for example (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ be delulu until it becomes trululu (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 96,770 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 1 minute ago, RahrahWitch said: Good I'm so tired of seeing Merch of other peoples imagery being sold without consent. I see it all the time with Copyrighted IPs and clothing. You want to profit of a person or Franchise, Then sweetie pay for a License to use it. But then it will doubled the price since license are expensive and most people will not afford that, say, people who shops at Primark for example (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ be delulu until it becomes trululu (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Gaga 1,466 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 1 hour ago, Gagaloo92 said: Wow. How desperate can you get. Just further demonstrates how Ariana is self-entitled with an inflated ego. And believes she's a diva Like get in and stay in your lane girl. You are not a legend or anywhere near close people like Gaga You need to calm down Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
smitherz 1,670 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 54 minutes ago, holy scheisse said: The lookalike is a WOC Ariana wishes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 2 hours ago, mariariot said: Yes but they are not profiting directly by it true dat Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Itsbrenda 2,983 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 She should be thankful she gets the promo tbh. she just doesn’t have a grip on reality Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProdigyARTPOP 3,889 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 did you guys not read? she basically was planning a deal/campaign with them that fell through the cracks, they basically just replaced her w a cheap version of her. which basically means they’re using her Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladylinners 485 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 1 hour ago, RAMROD said: But then it will doubled the price since license are expensive and most people will not afford that, say, people who shops at Primark for example Primark clothes actually state where they are licensed from. For example the Gaga t-shirt states that it's licensed by Ate My Heart. That's why licensed stuff are more expensive than their own brand shirts. It's still cheap though compared to other shops. I shop a lot of kids clothes at Primark and Disney/Nickelodeon etc are more expensive than the in-store brand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phlop 4,773 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 Didn’t they have a fake fragrance called “Crazy Lady” modeled after “Fame”? BYE Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RahrahWitch 6,913 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 1 hour ago, RAMROD said: But then it will doubled the price since license are expensive and most people will not afford that, say, people who shops at Primark for example I'm pretty sure shops like Primark have licensing with brands they use like Harry Potter and Game of thrones, Otherwise It'd be theft since those are copyrighted IP's. A lot of the time there might be a slight price increase or the price will stay the same and the License holder asks for a percentage of the profits in return for letting them use their IP. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.