Didymus 32,777 Posted July 27, 2019 Share Posted July 27, 2019 Live action, huh? Animated films are getting expensive. 260 million for this. Same as Tangled. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus 32,777 Posted July 27, 2019 Author Share Posted July 27, 2019 I expected a lot of the nature shots/backgrounds to be real at least Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lego 44,165 Posted July 27, 2019 Share Posted July 27, 2019 ok but I love Jon Favreau he directed all Iron Man movies and he’s hilarious as Happy in latest Spiderman. FreePalestine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enzo 37,977 Posted July 27, 2019 Share Posted July 27, 2019 Why even is it called live action then? 툭 까보면 어김없이 소리질러와 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jadeykins 1,418 Posted July 27, 2019 Share Posted July 27, 2019 well they obviously did a good job because nobody noticed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babel 40,911 Posted July 27, 2019 Share Posted July 27, 2019 Living halfway between fantasy and fantasy I see. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hardcore Porn 648 Posted July 27, 2019 Share Posted July 27, 2019 It's a CGI movie pretending to be live action. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PunkTheFunk 121,543 Posted July 27, 2019 Share Posted July 27, 2019 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regina George 59,387 Posted July 27, 2019 Share Posted July 27, 2019 You know how hard it would be for them to take shots of the real world and just place CGI lions in there? I mean what did y’all expect? It’s not a documentary, it’s a movie about talking lions. Ofc it’s CGI. But the CGI in this is AMAZING and I couldn’t tell that it’s CGI. Avatar is live action but 90% of that movie is CGI. Jungle Book too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runway 27,876 Posted July 27, 2019 Share Posted July 27, 2019 No wonder it was so PANNED Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reality 65,773 Posted July 27, 2019 Share Posted July 27, 2019 Ummmm....did you think it was live action?? It's a movei about talking/singing lions, of course 99% of it was CGI. 🃏🖤👹 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reality 65,773 Posted July 27, 2019 Share Posted July 27, 2019 37 minutes ago, Enzo said: Why even is it called live action then? Cause it simulates the real world. Of course it's not a "live action" movie, but you can't really market it as an animated movie either because then people will confuse with with the original animated movie. 🃏🖤👹 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus 32,777 Posted July 27, 2019 Author Share Posted July 27, 2019 9 minutes ago, M Monstre said: you can't really market it as an animated movie either because then people will confuse with with the original animated movie. Nobody would be confused. They just would care a lot less because that means it's just a remake in another animated style. Obviously they knew what they were doing but you can't deny that Disney pushing this "live action" narrative led to a lot more box office gross simply because of that wording Yes, we knew from the beginning most of it was going to be CGI but I did not expect there to be only one out of 1490 shots using real life photography. I thought it was worth sharing because of that, and also because that makes the price tag even more special: animated films usually don't cross the 200 million mark. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus 32,777 Posted July 27, 2019 Author Share Posted July 27, 2019 1 hour ago, lego said: ok but I love Jon Favreau he directed all Iron Man movies and he’s hilarious as Happy in latest Spiderman. He did not direct Iron Man 3. He worked on Cowboys & Aliens and Chef instead at that time. Just a not-so-important correction I appreciate Favreau but imo his only good movie is Iron Man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reality 65,773 Posted July 27, 2019 Share Posted July 27, 2019 2 minutes ago, Didymus said: Nobody would be confused. They just would care a lot less because that means it's just a remake in another animated style. Obviously they knew what they were doing but you can't deny that Disney pushing this "live action" narrative led to a lot more box office gross simply because of that wording They lead with "live action" because that's what it's supposed to simulate. Even if it is animated, why not capitalize on the fact that this movie is making some great technical achievement? 🃏🖤👹 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trending Now
New Threads
Trending Now
New Threads
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.